 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
Theory of Evolution - argument for/against
 |
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by christina>you 
That's not what I was implying. I'm saying, these types of questions have already been brought up in an earlier thread (more than once).
Creationism is my answer.
The question is actually the title of this thread so throwing 'creationism' in is not an answer because it does not actually address the question. So if you wanted to divert the thread you should offer some discussion.
Last edited by GrimJack; Nov 3rd, 2008 at 3:17 pm. Reason: poke,poke
Imagine a world without hypotheticals....
You can have my book when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
You can have my book when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by ddanbe
What's all the fuss about god or no god! Evolution or creationism.
•
•
•
•
We are all chemical reactions! I must admit it is a complex chemical reaction.
What can a chemical reaction say about evolution?
•
•
•
•
We are by the fact that we are.
•
•
•
•
We need oxigen and other chemicals
Stop delivering them so will stop our chemical reaction and we say we die!
Anyone out there ever survived 20 minutes under water? For example.
•
•
•
•
You can influence your chemical reaction by taking in a simple chemical compound : C2H5OH. Wich proves(no theory! anyone can do this, preferably at home) that you are chemical.
As I briefly alluded in a previous post - there does not appear to be anything in your post that argues for any side of the current question. So again I ask "if you are not going to add to the discussion, why are you posting?"
If you think your statements take a position, please expand on them to show how they are relevant. Then there can be discussion.
Imagine a world without hypotheticals....
You can have my book when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
You can have my book when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
yeah we had a chat about reopening the god thread and decided no
this shall be god thread 2.0
this shall be god thread 2.0
If i am helpful, please give me reputation points.
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,329
Reputation: 
Solved Threads: 4
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by GrimJack
The question is actually the title of this thread so throwing 'creationism' in is not an answer because it does not actually address the question. So if you wanted to divert the thread you should offer some discussion.
I am nothing special; of this I am sure. I am a common man with common thoughts, and I’ve led a common life. There are no monuments dedicated to me and my name will soon be forgotten, but I’ve loved another with all my heart and soul, and to me, this has always been enough. -The Notebook
•
•
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,438
Reputation: 
Solved Threads: 510
He means that the thread isn't a yes/no poll, but rather a discussion on the for/against arguments. "I'm against" isn't an argument, it's merely a statement.
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,329
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 4
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Ezzaral
He means that the thread isn't a yes/no poll, but rather a discussion on the for/against arguments. "I'm against" isn't an argument, it's merely a statement.
I am nothing special; of this I am sure. I am a common man with common thoughts, and I’ve led a common life. There are no monuments dedicated to me and my name will soon be forgotten, but I’ve loved another with all my heart and soul, and to me, this has always been enough. -The Notebook
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,273
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 175
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Ezzaral
He means that the thread isn't a yes/no poll, but rather a discussion on the for/against arguments. "I'm against" isn't an argument, it's merely a statement.
No one died when Clinton lied.
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by sneekula
Talking about making a statement, I heard on Public Radio that lots of Americans travel to England to spit on the grave of Charles Darwin.
Imagine a world without hypotheticals....
You can have my book when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
You can have my book when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 391
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 4
Posting Whiz
Evolution was theorized before Darwin. People such as Thales had view of a continually changing universe and natural selection as far back as 300 Bc.
An eye for an eye and the world would be blind.
|
Similar Threads
- Collins: Why this scientist believes in God (Geeks' Lounge)
- Evolution: Science vs. Religion (Geeks' Lounge)
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum
- Previous Thread: Helpminutes left! from a desperate mom!
- Next Thread: Happy new Year to All
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
You need to join our community in order to build your list of favorite forums. You can visit the forum index for a listing of all forums.
Related Forum Features
Latest Geeks' Lounge Posts
- Today's Posts
- Unanswered Threads
advice amazon apple article bear beard beijing bot chat children clocks code cognitive_disorder comedy console consoles convert daniweb development disk dlc ebook election facebook feed financialcrisis fun future games gaming garbage google grandtheftauto gta gtaiv halo3 happiness hardware information internet java kids knife language larnyx library linux love lynx mad madden mars merger microsoft murder netbook neuropathology news nintendo obama opinion os outlook pain parentalcontrol parenting planning playstation population ps3 ps4 python research school search sims software softwaredevelopment sony source space starteam stocks study subversion time tinfoil_hat usarmy videogames walmart wave wii windows windows>all windows_wins world worldofwarcraft www xbox xbox360
