Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

Reply

Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 2,344
Reputation: sneekula has a spectacular aura about sneekula has a spectacular aura about 
Solved Threads: 194
sneekula's Avatar
sneekula sneekula is offline Offline
Nearly a Posting Maven

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #111
Nov 5th, 2008
~~~ Possible Proof of Evolution ~~~~
Q: "What do you get when you cross a donkey with an onion?"
A: "A piece of ass that brings tears to your eyes!"
Last edited by sneekula; Nov 5th, 2008 at 8:07 am.
No one died when Clinton lied.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 848
Reputation: R0bb0b is on a distinguished road 
Solved Threads: 68
R0bb0b's Avatar
R0bb0b R0bb0b is offline Offline
Practically a Posting Shark

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #112
Nov 5th, 2008
Originally Posted by GrimJack View Post
Hunh? There are fossil records of several variations of paths from the common 'progenitor'. The fossil record does not show animals and plants appearing abruptly. If you have sources for your statements, I would like to see them.

Before we get too deep into this discussion, I need to know if you believe in a New Earth or Old Earth - if you believe in a New Earth, then there is not much room for discussion. Do you believe that everything was created exactly as it is in 7 days within the last 10-100,000 years? If so, how do you explain the various forms of finding the age of items (fossils, rocks, etc) using radio-active half-life?
No, I don't believe in new earth, think it is ridiculous and amazing that many Creationists still do. I do believe that a single organism can adapt, but to make some of the more drastic changes that would have to occur, I do not. However I have been trying to find fossil evidence proving either way and can't find it. All I find is evolutionists and creationists bickering back and forth about what they think is right without any evidence on either side, it's just about who has the best argument. I certainly cannot find any images representing transformations from ape to man. I did find a couple images of fossils that look like they may be transformations but noting like I would expect.
Last edited by R0bb0b; Nov 5th, 2008 at 10:43 am.
“Be who you are and say what you feel because those who mind don't matter and those who matter don't mind.” - Dr. Seuss

-- The documentation is inevitable, you may get away with it for a little while but eventually you too will have to do the deed.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,681
Reputation: Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future 
Solved Threads: 554
Moderator
Featured Poster
Ezzaral's Avatar
Ezzaral Ezzaral is offline Offline
Industrious Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #113
Nov 5th, 2008
There are several links on transitional fossils in the Evolution section at the bottom of this thread: http://episteme.arstechnica.com/eve/...m/841006407831
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 391
Reputation: steven woodman is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 4
steven woodman's Avatar
steven woodman steven woodman is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #114
Nov 5th, 2008
Here are a couple of examples which i believe proves the drastic changes which have lead to braching of new species.

Pelvis girdle in whales when they have no use and no legs - Obviously left from when they were land mammals

The appendix in the human - Left from when we were more herbivorous

Wings on ostriches and other birds - they must have been able to fly at some point in history

Why would such a perfect and divine creator place useless part on animals. Common people.
Last edited by steven woodman; Nov 5th, 2008 at 12:31 pm.
An eye for an eye and the world would be blind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2007
Posts: 4,681
Reputation: Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future Ezzaral has a brilliant future 
Solved Threads: 554
Moderator
Featured Poster
Ezzaral's Avatar
Ezzaral Ezzaral is offline Offline
Industrious Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #115
Nov 5th, 2008
Originally Posted by steven woodman View Post
Why would such a perfect and divine creator place useless part on animals.
Sense of humor?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 391
Reputation: steven woodman is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 4
steven woodman's Avatar
steven woodman steven woodman is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #116
Nov 5th, 2008
good answer. Maybe he gets a kick out of us trying to figure out if evolution is true so he throws in few curve balls like fingers in a whale.

No, but seriously, evolution is the final answer.
An eye for an eye and the world would be blind.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Apr 2005
Posts: 16,329
Reputation: jbennet is a splendid one to behold jbennet is a splendid one to behold jbennet is a splendid one to behold jbennet is a splendid one to behold jbennet is a splendid one to behold jbennet is a splendid one to behold 
Solved Threads: 555
Moderator
Featured Poster
jbennet's Avatar
jbennet jbennet is offline Offline
Moderator

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #117
Nov 9th, 2008
http://cdn.battlefieldheroes.com/signatures/229198472/1Player profile at BattlefieldHeroes.com, Free Shooter Game
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Aug 2005
Posts: 16,612
Reputation: Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute Ancient Dragon has a reputation beyond repute 
Solved Threads: 1614
Team Colleague
Featured Poster
Ancient Dragon's Avatar
Ancient Dragon Ancient Dragon is offline Offline
Still Learning

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #118
Nov 9th, 2008
All humans probably have a common human ansistor too, but that doesn't prove or disprove the theory of evolution. Human life probably started somewhere in Africa and spread around the globe from there. Same thing happened to those octopuses. Now, if scientists could some how PROVE that the original octopuse evolved from something else, then that would be an earth-shattering story.
The most important thing in the Olympic Games is not to win but to take part, just as the most important thing in life is not the triumph but the struggle. The essential thing is not to have conquered but to have fought well.
-Pierre de Coubertin, The Olympic Creed Inspired by Bishop Ethelbert
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,381
Reputation: GrimJack will become famous soon enough GrimJack will become famous soon enough 
Solved Threads: 17
Featured Poster
GrimJack's Avatar
GrimJack GrimJack is offline Offline
Nearly a Posting Maven

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #119
Nov 11th, 2008
Originally Posted by Ancient Dragon View Post
All humans probably have a common human ansistor too, but that doesn't prove or disprove the theory of evolution. Human life probably started somewhere in Africa and spread around the globe from there. Same thing happened to those octopuses. Now, if scientists could some how PROVE that the original octopuse evolved from something else, then that would be an earth-shattering story.
But that ancestor to humans was the ancestor to the great apes and other primates so wouldn't that point to evolution?
Imagine a world without hypotheticals....
“Remember this distinction: The Donner Party was on track. They were not on schedule."
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2007
Posts: 1,132
Reputation: hughv is on a distinguished road 
Solved Threads: 90
hughv hughv is offline Offline
Veteran Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #120
Nov 12th, 2008
Originally Posted by GrimJack View Post
I know 'like' is a personal choice but, jeeze, can you offer some support for such a radical (or should I say, reactionary) stand?
There are far too many idiots in these threads.
I detect that AIA is evolving. She's obviously well educated and thoughtful, if a little too harsh for my taste, but she's learned too hold back on the anger a bit, and seldom rises to the trolls any more. A worthy opponent is emerging.
BS, PH, CIB
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum


Views: 10200 | Replies: 136
Thread Tools Search this Thread



Tag cloud for Geeks' Lounge
About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2010 DaniWeb® LLC