Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

Reply

Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 1
Reputation: astatine is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
astatine astatine is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #131
Nov 16th, 2008
This is completely meaningless...
Although I am not majoring in biology, I am sure that EVOLUTION MUST WORK.
Let's suppose
1. that there is a 'replicator'.
2. 'offsprings' of the 'replicator' displays 'polymorphism' in their 'phenotype'.
3. offsprings with different phenotype has different probability to successfully produce their own offsprings.
Then, the ones with better phenotype (and, in case of carbon-based organisms on the Earth, genes) will win over their competitors (alleles), although those winners are still imperfect, and the influx of new replicators (genes) and the change of the environment are ceaseless. (Sorry for my English skill.) As a result, their will be an incessant shift in the frequencies of genes in the gene pool. This is what we call evolution, right? Then, if we are sure that the presumptions I stated above are true, why do we have to have doubt aboutit?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 44
Reputation: Obeledeveloper is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
Obeledeveloper's Avatar
Obeledeveloper Obeledeveloper is offline Offline
Light Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #132
Nov 18th, 2008
jbennet:
How do i explain that nothing comes from nothing, its somehow like explaining that the whole is greater than its parts, how does one explain that?
If something comes from nothing that will be creation. So u are a creationist now?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Nov 2008
Posts: 4
Reputation: umbraco is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
umbraco umbraco is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #133
Nov 18th, 2008
If you don`t accept Darwin, you also closes down knowledge for astronomy, anthropology, geology, biology, physics and zoology.

Counterknowledge by Damian Thompson
- $12.77 at amazone.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Aug 2008
Posts: 44
Reputation: Obeledeveloper is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
Obeledeveloper's Avatar
Obeledeveloper Obeledeveloper is offline Offline
Light Poster

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #134
Nov 27th, 2008
Seems there is another thread for this same topic.
Sow what you find lacking, sow what you want to reap
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,212
Reputation: GrimJack will become famous soon enough GrimJack will become famous soon enough 
Solved Threads: 16
Featured Poster
GrimJack's Avatar
GrimJack GrimJack is offline Offline
Nearly a Posting Maven

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #135
Jan 3rd, 2009
This thread looked like it was going to die - here is some life support:
evolutionary biologists and other members of the Coalition of the Sane have done the following very well:

1. Calling creationists f*cking morons (because they are).
2. Arguing that a better understanding of how life evolved is good in and of itself, and can imbue us with a certain sense of wonder.
3. Refuting specific creationist claims.

These are necessary, but not sufficient. What we rarely do is make an affirmative, positive argument for evolution (as opposed to against creationism). I proposed one particular argument: we can't do applied medical genomics at all without using evolutionary theory and tools. There are many other examples that can be made (I merely chose this one because I know it rather well).

The other thing we evolutionary biologists don't do enough of, and this stems from the previous point, is make an emotional and moral case for the study of evolution. Last night, I concluded my talk with a quote from Dover, PA creationist school board member William Buckingham, who declared, "Two thousand years ago someone died on a cross. Can't someone take a stand for him?"

My response was, "In the last two minutes, someone died from a bacterial infection. We take a stand for him." [1]
Last edited by GrimJack; Jan 3rd, 2009 at 2:02 am. Reason: I know that I broke my own rule but....
Attached Thumbnails
Protection.jpg  
Imagine a world without hypotheticals....
You can have my book when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,212
Reputation: GrimJack will become famous soon enough GrimJack will become famous soon enough 
Solved Threads: 16
Featured Poster
GrimJack's Avatar
GrimJack GrimJack is offline Offline
Nearly a Posting Maven

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #136
Jan 3rd, 2009
Originally Posted by Obeledeveloper View Post
Seems there is another thread for this same topic.
If so, link to it; but at least read the last couple post to find out that it was closed for being too long for any newcomer to read it all or it was decided to take the argument to another level.
Imagine a world without hypotheticals....
You can have my book when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 2,212
Reputation: GrimJack will become famous soon enough GrimJack will become famous soon enough 
Solved Threads: 16
Featured Poster
GrimJack's Avatar
GrimJack GrimJack is offline Offline
Nearly a Posting Maven

Re: Theory of Evolution - argument for/against

 
0
  #137
Jan 3rd, 2009
Originally Posted by Obeledeveloper View Post
Where by merlin's beard would evolution have started from dear grumpier, nothing comes from nothing if nothing existed what would have evolved
It was not anywhere near Merlin's beard - this is where it was:
The oscillator representation is used for the non-perturbative description of vacuum particle creation in a strong time-dependent electric field in the framework of scalar QED. It is shown that the method can be more effective for the derivation of the quantum kinetic equation (KE) in comparison with the Bogoliubov method of time-dependent canonical transformations. This KE is used for the investigation of vacuum creation in periodical linear and circular polarized electric fields and also in the case of the presence of a constant magnetic field, including the back reaction problem. In particular, these examples are applied for a model illustration of some features of vacuum creation of electron-positron plasma within the planned experiments on the X-ray free electron lasers.
Attached Thumbnails
_kitler_pics_kitler30-1.jpg  
Imagine a world without hypotheticals....
You can have my book when you pry it from my cold, dead fingers.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



Tag cloud for Geeks' Lounge
About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC