| | |
Images in signatures
Please support our Growing an Online Community advertiser: Get a Free Web Site Analysis!
![]() |
I've seen sigs get way out of hand.
On one forum there were people with sigs that were almost a screenfull (at 1024x768) of images and a page of text (for about 500k of data for the sig alone).
They'd then post 10 or so replies in a thread, each a single line long...
That was the end of that, strict limits were imposed as to the size of banners (something like 200x70 pixels and 5kb max, plus max 3 lines of text) and ever since the moderators are having to tell people to scale down their sigs several times a week...
On one forum there were people with sigs that were almost a screenfull (at 1024x768) of images and a page of text (for about 500k of data for the sig alone).
They'd then post 10 or so replies in a thread, each a single line long...
That was the end of that, strict limits were imposed as to the size of banners (something like 200x70 pixels and 5kb max, plus max 3 lines of text) and ever since the moderators are having to tell people to scale down their sigs several times a week...
•
•
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 4
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I think it all depends on the type of forum you have and the enviroment you are trying to create. I have been to many a forum and many of them allow pictues which i am fond of esp when they are funny or creative and many ofthe posters limit themsleves on this but at times it becomes a problem and rules are set pertaining to the size of the image. as for animated images i find these semi rude to the people who are still on dial up and have to wait even longer for the page to load. pics in sigs arent bad just not always fitting
yeah sigs can cause loading problems but the sigs here are not hosted on this site they are hostedd remotely.
http://willpull22.remnetworks.com/hl2sig.jpg
http://willpull22.remnetworks.com/hl2sig.jpg
My take
That depends on what it is. Make strict rules on what the sig can and cannot be and a uniform look can still be achieved.
This is not really true. If an image is loaded once it does not get loaded again no matter how many times its on the page. After all, it is just one file regardless of how many times its shown. However, the load time can be an issue if the users servers are slow like many free hosting servers.
Once again, moderating what sigs can and cannot be comes into play here.
Simply make a rule that they cannot do such things. No outside links. Besides that, they can still advertise in their sigs now with text links. Once again, its about rules.
Can't disagree here. Only with good moderation of sigs could you allow them.
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by cscgal
- It clutters the interface and distracts from the most important thing - the content
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by cscgal
- Long loading times of threads. Especially when someone with an image in their sig posts multiple times in the forum
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by cscgal
- From a marketing perspective, glancing at a page with images in the signature portrays a much less professional atmosphere, which can be detrimental to some prospective members but most importantly when trying to land corporate clients as advertisers
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by cscgal
- So many website owners use banners (even 468x60 which isn't HUGE) and link them to their website as their signature ... therefore getting free banner advertising on DaniWeb ... so no one will buy and we won't make any $
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by cscgal
I feel that images in signatures are fun for some lighthearted / off-topic communities, but I want to give the impression of a professional business I.T. type atmosphere. The images seem to counteract that.
I am not a big fan of images on signatures because they tend to take away the flow of a topic and are annoying distractions.
I recently had a member who posted two huge images on his signature and I asked him to remove them - politely of course - and gave him my reasons why I didn't want them there.
I recently had a member who posted two huge images on his signature and I asked him to remove them - politely of course - and gave him my reasons why I didn't want them there.
Check out many of the forums on the internet, almost all have the ability for sigs. Simple fact is those that have one, love them. either to show off their abilities or work or something similar. Many like them as a simple 1 image with details in it about their PC or gaming clan or work/website or all those other things they are used for.
Personally i like them, its nice to see what users are doing with themselves these days.
I would definately enable them but limit the image size to say 80k or something reasonable like that.
At the end of the day it cant be a size of page worry for this forum due to the adverts all over the place and the html code thus far for this thread being over 24k. Add images and avatars and adverts and the total download is pretty large.
Id say allow sigs but insist they be either hosted remotely or locally but small (im sure you have bandwidth/storage concerns).
There are many free image hosts out there (getsigned.org uploadit photobucket and others)
Personally i like them, its nice to see what users are doing with themselves these days.
I would definately enable them but limit the image size to say 80k or something reasonable like that.
At the end of the day it cant be a size of page worry for this forum due to the adverts all over the place and the html code thus far for this thread being over 24k. Add images and avatars and adverts and the total download is pretty large.
Id say allow sigs but insist they be either hosted remotely or locally but small (im sure you have bandwidth/storage concerns).
There are many free image hosts out there (getsigned.org uploadit photobucket and others)
I'm pink, therefore, im spam.
http://www.vivaci.net - Quality Webhosting
http://gaming.vivaci.net - FAST UK Gaming servers
http://www.getsigned.org - Free Image Uploads
http://www.vivaci.net - Quality Webhosting
http://gaming.vivaci.net - FAST UK Gaming servers
http://www.getsigned.org - Free Image Uploads
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 91
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Well you can always install only show the signature once per page, that will decrease the crowding, and possibly add a script to check [img] tags for the image etc and if its too large return an error stating the allowed size
My Site: Animation Talk is the best place to discuss animation.
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Antonbomb22
Well you can always install only show the signature once per page, that will decrease the crowding, and possibly add a script to check [img] tags for the image etc and if its too large return an error stating the allowed size
is this a dream
We should all respect Dani, shes the admin and she does a damn good job!. Not to forget the rest of the mod's =)
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v514/LinkinPark5546/Sphyenx.jpg[/img]
We should all respect Dani, shes the admin and she does a damn good job!. Not to forget the rest of the mod's =)
[img]http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v514/LinkinPark5546/Sphyenx.jpg[/img]
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2004
Posts: 91
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
also if your using vB use the function that counts the number of times an image tag is used, this you can use to set it to that only one image may be present in a signature
My Site: Animation Talk is the best place to discuss animation.
![]() |
Other Threads in the Growing an Online Community Forum
- Previous Thread: What do you think about a Rewards Program?
- Next Thread: Converting a community member to a client - when is it appropriate
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
analytics aol bebo bing blockbuster bloggers blogging blogs bug building business celebrity censorship charmin communities community communitycolleges content craigslist crime crowdsourcing davidmeermanscott digg digitalmovierentals e-learning education election employment engagement enterprise enterprise2.0 facebook facebookfriends forrester ftc gambling gender gmail google government growingonlinecommunities handle influencers internet iphone ketchum legal linkedin marketing mashable media membership microblogging mobile myspace netflix netiquette networking news obama online onlinegaming onlinemovies phishing policy politics privacy psychographics reader research retweet security sharing skype small social socialmedia socialmediameasurement socialnetworking socialnetworks study success survey technology trademark transparency tweetdeck tweeting twitter user video viral virtual wave web web2.0 webanalytics wordpress yahoo youtube






