| | |
website monitoring on network
Thread Solved |
•
•
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 45
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I give you a "more than solved"! You definitely have helped me with this more than I could have expected, and I greatly appreciate it!
I really wish I could find something that would run sort of in the background 24/7 on my main machine that would just log URLS and not be very demanding on CPU, but the Wireshark does do what I want it to, just kind of in a more extravagant fashion.
Thanks again!
Derek
I really wish I could find something that would run sort of in the background 24/7 on my main machine that would just log URLS and not be very demanding on CPU, but the Wireshark does do what I want it to, just kind of in a more extravagant fashion.
Thanks again!
Derek
There is always the "Add to reputation" under my name if you want to give more thanks
Reputation is always appreciated
With wireshark there are a few more options to decrease CPU. Go to capture -- options and put in the tcp.port filter there (you can also add a capture filter for ip.addr != 192.168.0.1 and use YOUR ip address, this will stop your traffic from eating up CPU). The display filter only filters what is showed on the screen but the capture filter stops it from logging, writing to disk, displaying on grid, deep packet analysis, etc.
In the same screen set it to log to a file and under Display Options disable "Update list of packets in real time", "Autmatic scrolling in live capture". Under "Name Resolution" deselect all 3 checkboxes. This should significant decrease the Wireshark overhead. Let me know how that works for you
Out of curiosity -- what sites are you trying to bust your roomies visiting?
Reputation is always appreciatedWith wireshark there are a few more options to decrease CPU. Go to capture -- options and put in the tcp.port filter there (you can also add a capture filter for ip.addr != 192.168.0.1 and use YOUR ip address, this will stop your traffic from eating up CPU). The display filter only filters what is showed on the screen but the capture filter stops it from logging, writing to disk, displaying on grid, deep packet analysis, etc.
In the same screen set it to log to a file and under Display Options disable "Update list of packets in real time", "Autmatic scrolling in live capture". Under "Name Resolution" deselect all 3 checkboxes. This should significant decrease the Wireshark overhead. Let me know how that works for you
Out of curiosity -- what sites are you trying to bust your roomies visiting?
Last edited by sknake; Aug 2nd, 2009 at 3:06 pm.
•
•
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 45
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
Out of curiosity -- what sites are you trying to bust your roomies visiting?
I will try the additional settings you recommended and see how that works for me. I have added to your reputation as well!
Derek
I thought so. I was questioning whether or not I should explain how to do this since it could be a huge invasion of privacy .. but you were far too patient so I figured it was a concerned parent or someone with a very interesting story 
You can start null routing the sites they frequent on your router if discipline alone doesn't work. If you want to go that route then create a new thread and post the URL on here so i'll get notified.

You can start null routing the sites they frequent on your router if discipline alone doesn't work. If you want to go that route then create a new thread and post the URL on here so i'll get notified.
•
•
Join Date: May 2005
Posts: 45
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Hmm, no, I don't think that would work. Seems to be a general variety of many different sites usually found using search engines. One brute force method that I don't really like is to disable the ability to delete browser history through the IE options, but this guy is pretty clever...I don't want to rely on that alone, cause there are definitely work-arounds to that. So, no, I don't think that URL blocking or null routing would really work. I'm more interested in tracking and busting right now, me and my wife.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Managed Intel P IV/1GB Ram/320GB HD/1000 GB Data Transfer/10MBps Network @ $59/mo (Web Hosting Deals)
- Website monitoring...!! (Java)
- Website not viewed within network (Networking Hardware Configuration)
- can only view website inside network (Networking Hardware Configuration)
Other Threads in the Network Security Forum
- Previous Thread: Security Journalist of the Year says UK is wrong to extradite Gary McKinnon
- Next Thread: Help for Research
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
2008 adobe advice antivirus apple blackmail botnet browser business china civilliberties confidentiality crime cybercrime cyberwarfare daniweb data database dataloss dataprotection development email emailretention encryption exploit facebook fail forensic fraud google government hack hacker hacking hardware homelandsecurity ibm idtheft information infosec internet iphone kaspersky kernel law linux malware mcafee mckinnon microsoft military mobile music nasa nationalsecurity network networks news obama olympics password passwords pentagon phishing phone politics privacy realplayer report research safari satnav scam search security skype socialnetworking software softwaredevelopment spam sqlinjection survey symantec terrorism terrorist theft trends trojan trojans twitter uk usb virtualization virus vulnerability web wireless worm yahoo youtube






