| | |
Google penalizes sites for having duplicate content?
Please support our Search Engine Optimization advertiser: Get a Free SEO Analysis!
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2009
Posts: 37
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 1
Hi folks,
There is a popular myth about duplicate content, and that is that Google penalizes sites for having duplicate content.
Greg Grothaus of the Search Quality Team of Google cleard that Google itself is not penalizing you for it.
Google recognizes that most duplicate content is not created to be deceptive. There are of course exceptions, which are considered spam. They're being penalized for being spam but not for having duplicate content.
There are some issues that can arise that may negatively affect your rankings.
1) Your link popularity will be diluted. Backlinks pointing to several different URL versions(like domain.com, www.domain.com, domain.com/index.htm) of the same content, will make it harder to accumulate link juice for one URL.
2) User-unfriendly URLs in search results may offset branding efforts and decrease usability as well.
3) With multiple versions of the same thing, Google will spend more time crawling the same content, meaning it will have less time to go deeper into your site, and you run the risk of having content not get indexed.
More interesting reading at webpronews.com/topnews/2009/09/16/google-busts-the-duplicate-content-myth
There is a popular myth about duplicate content, and that is that Google penalizes sites for having duplicate content.
Greg Grothaus of the Search Quality Team of Google cleard that Google itself is not penalizing you for it.
Google recognizes that most duplicate content is not created to be deceptive. There are of course exceptions, which are considered spam. They're being penalized for being spam but not for having duplicate content.
There are some issues that can arise that may negatively affect your rankings.
1) Your link popularity will be diluted. Backlinks pointing to several different URL versions(like domain.com, www.domain.com, domain.com/index.htm) of the same content, will make it harder to accumulate link juice for one URL.
2) User-unfriendly URLs in search results may offset branding efforts and decrease usability as well.
3) With multiple versions of the same thing, Google will spend more time crawling the same content, meaning it will have less time to go deeper into your site, and you run the risk of having content not get indexed.
More interesting reading at webpronews.com/topnews/2009/09/16/google-busts-the-duplicate-content-myth
Here is the Myth about duplicate content discussed by Matt Cutts; http://www.webpronews.com/topnews/20...e-content-myth
You just posted the same link that sam09 did?
Also, sam09 is talking about the same content under multiple URLs on the same page. Duplicate content is usually revolving around the same article or content across multiple websites (aka plagiarism).
Also, sam09 is talking about the same content under multiple URLs on the same page. Duplicate content is usually revolving around the same article or content across multiple websites (aka plagiarism).
•
•
Join Date: Aug 2009
Posts: 21
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
Hi folks,
There is a popular myth about duplicate content, and that is that Google penalizes sites for having duplicate content.
Greg Grothaus of the Search Quality Team of Google cleard that Google itself is not penalizing you for it.
Google recognizes that most duplicate content is not created to be deceptive. There are of course exceptions, which are considered spam. They're being penalized for being spam but not for having duplicate content.
There are some issues that can arise that may negatively affect your rankings.
1) Your link popularity will be diluted. Backlinks pointing to several different URL versions(like domain.com, www.domain.com, domain.com/index.htm) of the same content, will make it harder to accumulate link juice for one URL.
2) User-unfriendly URLs in search results may offset branding efforts and decrease usability as well.
3) With multiple versions of the same thing, Google will spend more time crawling the same content, meaning it will have less time to go deeper into your site, and you run the risk of having content not get indexed.
More interesting reading at webpronews.com/topnews/2009/09/16/google-busts-the-duplicate-content-myth
The appropriate way to reproduce content is to use the <blockquote> html tag, and use <blockquote cite="original source url"> to give credit. This tells Google that your content is reproduced and so if someone does a Google search, show the original content and not yours (so you won't really get any Google traffic off of a page with a reproduced article) but you don't get any type of penalty for duplicate content yourself either. And that's a good thing.
•
•
•
•
You just posted the same link that sam09 did?
Also, sam09 is talking about the same content under multiple URLs on the same page. Duplicate content is usually revolving around the same article or content across multiple websites (aka plagiarism).
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Google Penalty... (Search Engine Optimization)
- Three domain names, one site. SEO Problem (Duplicate Content) (HTML and CSS)
- Duplicate content issues with friendly URL's (Search Engine Optimization)
- Possible duplicate content dilemma (Search Engine Optimization)
- Google says duplicate content is OK (Search Engine Optimization)
- Google sitemaps and duplicate content risk issues (Search Engine Optimization)
- Avoiding the duplicate content issue (Search Engine Optimization)
- Google endorses SEO (Search Engine Optimization)
Other Threads in the Search Engine Optimization Forum
- Previous Thread: PageRank and its mathematics: Explanation needed
- Next Thread: How can see my site on Google 1st page ?
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
adsense adult advertising analytics android api apple apps bing blackberry blogger blogging browser business cellphone chrome cloudcomputing code coding congress copyright cuil development doubleclick earnings economy email engine facebook g1 gdata gmail google googledocs googleearth government hardware hp ibm icahn internet iphone java journalism linux malware mapping maps marketing media merger microsoft mobile msn myspace netbook netbooks news office onlineads operatingsystem os pagerank palm privacy programming publishing revenue rss saas search searchengine security seo serps sex socialnetwork socialnetworking software space spam statistics streetview t-mobile technologystocks twitter uk verizon video vista wave web wiki wikipedia windows wolframalpha xml yahoo yahoo! youtube







