| | |
What is Google doing now?
Please support our Growing an Online Community advertiser: Get a Free Web Site Analysis!
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,133
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 2
Google recently announced something called Sidewiki. What this does is creates an overlay on any website/url allowing commenting and ratings that, since it is generated by the browser and not the website owner, means that if someone puts up something really bad or questionable about your site you can do nothing about it.
In one of my previous posts I talked about reasons why companies do not get involved in social media, one of them being that haters will trash your brand or company online. Sidewiki takes the option of participation out of the company's hands as every company needs some web presence. How hard does this make our jobs as both community creators and web professionals? For me I know that many of my clients will freak when they hear this so I have to start looking into this to be ready to respond, as I think many of you will have to also.
In one of my previous posts I talked about reasons why companies do not get involved in social media, one of them being that haters will trash your brand or company online. Sidewiki takes the option of participation out of the company's hands as every company needs some web presence. How hard does this make our jobs as both community creators and web professionals? For me I know that many of my clients will freak when they hear this so I have to start looking into this to be ready to respond, as I think many of you will have to also.
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 125
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 13
•
•
•
•
Google recently announced something called Sidewiki. What this does is creates an overlay on any website/url allowing commenting and ratings that, since it is generated by the browser and not the website owner, means that if someone puts up something really bad or questionable about your site you can do nothing about it.
In one of my previous posts I talked about reasons why companies do not get involved in social media, one of them being that haters will trash your brand or company online. Sidewiki takes the option of participation out of the company's hands as every company needs some web presence. How hard does this make our jobs as both community creators and web professionals? For me I know that many of my clients will freak when they hear this so I have to start looking into this to be ready to respond, as I think many of you will have to also.
This could be good and bad. There will be people that post negative stuff on pages because they are competitors or don't like someone that works there, but this also will keep companies from taking down legitimate comments about their practices that they don't like.
A+, Network+, Server+, MCP 70-270, MCP 70-290
Always check the simple fix first.
Always check the simple fix first.
•
•
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,133
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 2
•
•
•
•
This could be good and bad. There will be people that post negative stuff on pages because they are competitors or don't like someone that works there, but this also will keep companies from taking down legitimate comments about their practices that they don't like.
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 125
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 13
•
•
•
•
I see it as more bad then good due to the negative posts that can be put up by competitors. Most companies leave negative comments up so that they can address them and show that the either the comments are withour merit or that by responding that they are sensitive to the needs of customers. While there are some that do take down negative comments so that they only look good, they are eventually seen for what they are because while they can control their own sites/blogs they cannot control the chat rooms and message boards.
These companies can just as easily respond to the comments on google. This just takes it out of the companies hands. Yes, there are forums and such, but this makes it much easier for the general consumer to get feedback on a company without having to read multiple forums and chat rooms.
A+, Network+, Server+, MCP 70-270, MCP 70-290
Always check the simple fix first.
Always check the simple fix first.
•
•
Join Date: May 2009
Posts: 1,133
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 2
•
•
•
•
These companies can just as easily respond to the comments on google. This just takes it out of the companies hands. Yes, there are forums and such, but this makes it much easier for the general consumer to get feedback on a company without having to read multiple forums and chat rooms.
If I am a company and I want to give my customers and potential customers the opportunity to post comments that can be seen when someone visits my site, that should be my choice. Companies pay to register Urls, they pay for site hosting, they make significant investments in the look and feel of their site and for Google to proactively allow anyone to put up comments on someone's site without their permission is wrong.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Google Trends? helpful or not (Search Engine Optimization)
- News Story: Google Base Data API good news for Blogger bloggers (XML, XSLT and XPATH)
- News Story: Google Code Jam 2006 (Pay-Per-Click Advertising)
- News Story: Google Book Search no bad thing, says fed up author (Pay-Per-Click Advertising)
- News Story: "Change to ads about" link in Google AdSense ads (Pay-Per-Click Advertising)
- News Story: Google Disclaimer in SERPS (Pay-Per-Click Advertising)
- News Story: Google Analytics Site Overlay (Pay-Per-Click Advertising)
Other Threads in the Growing an Online Community Forum
- Previous Thread: WARNING - Twitter Worm spreading via direct messages
- Next Thread: Do You Use Craigslist To Reach your Target group?
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
analytics aol bebo bing blockbuster bloggers blogging blogs building business celebrity censorship charmin communities community communitycolleges content craigslist crime crowdsourcing davidmeermanscott digg digitalmovierentals e-learning education election employment engagement enterprise enterprise2.0 facebook facebookfriends fan forrester ftc gambling gender gmail google government growingonlinecommunities handle influencers internet iphone ketchum legal linkedin marketing mashable media membership microblogging mobile myspace netflix netiquette networking news obama online onlinegaming onlinemovies phishing policy politics privacy psychographics reader research retweet security sharing skype small social socialmedia socialmediameasurement socialnetworking socialnetworks study success survey technology trademark transparency tweetdeck tweeting twitter user video viral virtual wave web web2.0 webanalytics wordpress yahoo youtube






