![]() |
| ||
| Doubt about 2NF Hi, I was reading the book "Fundamentals of Database Systems" by Elmasri and Navathe. In that it is given that for a relation to be in 2nd NF, every non prime attribute (attribute which is not a part of any candidate key) should be fully functionally dependent on any candidate key. Also a relation is given as EMP_DEPT(ENAME,SSN,BDATE,ADDRESS,DNUMBER,DNAME) where, EMP_DEPT- Employee Department ENAME- Employee Name SSN-Social Security Number BDATE-Birthdate DNUMBER- Dept Number DNAME- Dept Name This is said to be in 2NF. However if you see the DNAME attribute which is non prime (not a part of candidate key), it is not functionally dependent on any candidate key (SSN in this case). So is it correct that the relation is in 2NF or is there something that I have missed? Thanks |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 7:15 pm. |
Forum system based on vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC