DaniWeb IT Discussion Community

DaniWeb IT Discussion Community (http://www.daniweb.com/forums/index.php)
-   Search Engine Optimization (http://www.daniweb.com/forums/forum45.html)
-   -   How many links per page? (http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread35973.html)

cscgal Nov 27th, 2005 4:16 pm
How many links per page?
 
What is the ideal number of links to have per page? What is the maximum number of links on a particular page that Googlebot will spider?

mddv Nov 28th, 2005 7:38 am
Re: How many links per page?
 
well i will stick to atleast 50 max per page.

cscgal Nov 28th, 2005 11:49 am
Re: How many links per page?
 
Uh oh! :) My homepage has near 200! :eek:

fromthe5 Nov 30th, 2005 2:18 am
Re: How many links per page?
 
I have heard that it's somewhere around 100 but I won't chisel that in stone. In terms of link exchanges I will only put 25 to 30 on a page. And I won't trade with a site that uses more. The PR that passes will be pretty diluted at more than that.

SEO Cat Dec 5th, 2005 2:31 pm
Re: How many links per page?
 
Google suggests to webmasters not use more than 100 links per page. Ok, cool, we dont always listen to Google though...However, if you want to exchange links then you'll find most people who are switched on in this area wont reciprocate if there are more than 15-20 links on the page you intend to put their link on.

(More on this in the 'SEO Made Easy' book in my sig - free!)

seo_expert Dec 23rd, 2005 7:27 am
Re: How many links per page?
 
according to Google (http://www.google.com/webmasters/guidelines.html) a page should have less then 100 links.

though less links you have the better...

jewboy Dec 30th, 2005 4:34 pm
Re: How many links per page?
 
I don't think there is a definitive answer, but 100 is the industry standard. But then again, look at Craigslist, and Wikipedia. Is there anything but links on these sites?

canadafred Feb 10th, 2006 4:24 pm
Re: How many links per page?
 
This is another criteria that needs to find a balance. The whole epidemic to building links is created by the concept that Google rewards web pages that have greater link popularity. In most cases this has some validity, today. We know that the Google algos administer penalties to pages that contain only links on them, even though it may not appear to be the case. Web sites that have web pages containing many links on them can perform well in a keyphrase search but usually would perform even better with less links on them. This follows the original concept established at Sanford regarding PageRank. The more links going from the pages of a web site to other sites, the more PageRank it bled externally.

More and more, Google is swaying towards rewarding web pages that are intended for the Internet visitor. This makes sense. We know that Google is presently in a major renovation of it's algos and of it's PageRanking criteria. Link building has been abused for too long. Seldomly anymore do we get the best web site for the keyphrase search. We get the one that has the most links to it ( I'm talking about PR5+ keyphrase competitions in general ). How Google latest update will affect the SERPs, nobody knows. I feel safe to assume that Google wants to stick around for a while as a major search engine, even though it has it's fingers in other cookie jars. We have seen over the years what happens to search engines that stray too far away from what they originally intent. They begin to forget about the Internet visitor and with providing the visitor with the best results for keyphrase searches.

In keyphrase competitions whereas the top players are PR4's and less, link popularity is not as important an issue as in PR5+ keyphrase competitions. There exists PR4's that have no backlinks at all, although these examples are becoming harder to find. I was having this discussion somewhere else and went looking for an example the other day but couldn't find one. I did however find a PR4 that had one backlink ( checked in MSN and Yahoo as well ). I see PR2 web pages beating out PR5's in keyphrase competitions regularly. Heck, I can provide an example of a PR0 that smokes 1.9 million other keyphrase competitors.

I suggest concentrating on the internal content. Build more pages and do it logically for both the visitor and the spider. If on a page the content naturally calls for twenty links, then by all means put twenty links. Pages that are built to satisfy link exchanges are becoming of little value for the Internet visitor, thus little value in the SERPs. That's why the Internet visitor performs a search initially, to find a web site that satisfies his search requirements, not to find web sites that have pages and pages of linked external site.

Also, Google doesn't differentiate between internal and external links. If you want your Entrance page to perform better, include a keyphrase rich textual link to it from all your pages. When a web site is entirely built around five or six keyphrases and the internal linking structure is sound and decisively powerful, this frequently is sufficient to outperform the keyphrase challengers.

trishainfotech Feb 12th, 2006 2:56 am
Re: How many links per page?
 
i would limit it to maximum 20 . and also i will place only inbound links on pages . it does not affect your ranking how many sites links you have placed however it really affect how many sites have placed your link on there site


All times are GMT -4. The time now is 7:44 am.

Forum system based on vBulletin Copyright ©2000 - 2009, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC