Search Results

Showing results 1 to 11 of 11
Search took 0.02 seconds.
Search: Posts Made By: BestJewSinceJC ; Forum: Assembly and child forums
Forum: Assembly Oct 15th, 2009
Replies: 2
Views: 234
Posted By BestJewSinceJC
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/MIPS_architecture
Forum: Assembly Oct 15th, 2009
Replies: 1
Views: 390
Posted By BestJewSinceJC
A jmp statement?

http://www.geocities.com/SiliconValley/Park/3230/x86asm/asml1006.html
Forum: Assembly Jun 30th, 2009
Replies: 3
Views: 411
Posted By BestJewSinceJC
Your explanations at the bottom look like a teacher wrote them. Nice attempt at a disguise. Either way, we don't do projects for people - post your attempt at a solution, then we'll guide you.
Forum: Assembly May 10th, 2009
Replies: 6
Views: 351
Posted By BestJewSinceJC
There will be a "carry over" if the result can't fit into a 32 bit integer, presumably, which will cause the carry flag to be set. Then you just need to check the carry flag, which will be 1 if there...
Forum: Assembly Apr 10th, 2009
Replies: 15
Views: 13,039
Posted By BestJewSinceJC
JW1234:

Binary code and machine code are the same thing.
Forum: Assembly Apr 7th, 2009
Replies: 8
Views: 586
Posted By BestJewSinceJC
...???

I'm not sure what you mean by that. Put it like this: since every architecture has it's own set of instructions, a compiler needs to be capable of breaking a high level language's...
Forum: Assembly Apr 3rd, 2009
Replies: 8
Views: 586
Posted By BestJewSinceJC
Yes, since different architectures have different sets of instructions (instructions break down into machine code), different architectures would need a different compiler.
Forum: Assembly Apr 3rd, 2009
Replies: 8
Views: 586
Posted By BestJewSinceJC
In response to the poster above me, no, Assembly is not machine language. Assembly is a language that is translated into machine code by the assembler. Programming languages are not OS dependent,...
Forum: Assembly Nov 12th, 2008
Replies: 5
Views: 2,746
Posted By BestJewSinceJC
Yeah, I know that. What I was saying is that if the C++ code was good to begin with, and the compiler optimized it well, whereas the assembly was poorly written....
Forum: Assembly Nov 11th, 2008
Replies: 0
Solved: Data forwarding
Views: 389
Posted By BestJewSinceJC
I read about data forwarding and according to my notes, a nop (no-op) is required before a beq operation and after a lw operation. What about sw?
Forum: Assembly Nov 11th, 2008
Replies: 5
Views: 2,746
Posted By BestJewSinceJC
The person who posted above me is completely wrong. Assembly is faster than any other code if you use/code it correctly. It could be that the optimizations the compiler made for the C++ code were...
Showing results 1 to 11 of 11

 


About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC