Another casualty, then, as I said. I think that post predated the syntax tags, so it must have been "automatic". :icon_rolleyes:

And is http://www.daniweb.com/forums/thread245380.html related?

I didn't notice until recently that another post of mine got munched by the latest "upgrade". In this (http://www.daniweb.com/tutorials/tutorial45806.html), I'd had a link in the comments of the...

Heh. I'm more accustomed to the opposite:

"Hi mi code doesn't work. [No code posted.] What's wrong?"
:P

OMG, Narue!?
:P

:icon_lol:

Right. In every other forum I frequent, I change the font to Courier New. Once upon a time, we could do that here. And that is what I was trying to say.

One way it was done ages ago elseweb was [code], [quote], and [syntax]. The syntax tags were used for the "fancy" code tags. Quote in monospace to me would look stupid.

[edit]Keeping the fonts,...

Yup. I need the flyover to remind me that it means multiquote.

Just press the "quick reply" button, or the "reply to thread" button :)[/QUOTE]Ah, but that's defeatured...

I believe your expectation used to be the default behavior. The new default was an "upgrade" a while back. The compromise you see is the result of some complainin'. (If I remember things correctly.)

Another vote for the DevShed approach? (Where even 0 rep bumps have attributions, and commenting available as to a reason why?)
:icon_razz:

I don't think I'd be a fan of time limits. I think...

Let's look at a few examples of how I might use it "inline code" tags:



I kinda find it a pain in the ass to type out the tags for something like = or %02d or where I use them several times...

Just leave it as the cryptic green box and they'll never even notice?

Amenities for the regulars would be nice. I keep losing my favorite amenities with each upgrade. The newbs are spoonfed their...

Can you add the button to the Quick Reply? I tend to use it (as previously mentioned ad nauseum :icon_razz:) for anything in which fixed font helps text stand out better. In fact, I probably use it...

A preview of what I've mentioned several times.

I'll second this suggestion.

I had asked for this years ago, I believe: essentially the DevShed approach of choosing the amount of both positive and negative rep. I'd found even zero-rep agrees and disagrees to be useful.

Is there a way to encourage folks to put the description text in a description area and the code text in the code area? Most recent attempts have been backwards (although most recent attempts haven't...

[threadjack]Somewhere around here I'd asked about retaining the username for an Advanced Search following an unsuccessful search attempt (just like it retains the keyword(s). Is this something that...

So far in the C and C++ sections, I think it's been all noise and no signal.

Hopefully the signal to noise ratio will be tolerable.

http://www.daniweb.com/forums/online.php

?

I mentioned it like 2 years ago. The general feeling I got was "no there isn't" and "don't expect one".

Contrary to popular belief, moderator duties really have little to do with being knowledgeable about a particular subject. Moderating has more to do being online and keeping threads in order:

...

*Whew* I had to make sure it wasn't my Daniweb Twitterbot (http://twitter.com/daniweblog). That description didn't resemble that bot, but I had to check. :icon_razz:

i can haz admin ritez?
:icon_razz:

Is there a link for http://www.daniweb.com/forums/spy.php roaming around the page somewhere? Or is that now in a limbo kind of like the IRC chat?

Pages that have some form of default audio to me fall in the NSFW category. So chalk me up in the "no audio ads" camp.

Considering that there's a link at the bottom of every page, I can't see much hoopla about this.

Just now http://www.daniweb.com/search/search.php?q=case+insensitive+strstr found me what I was after as #1. :icon_cool: :icon_cheesygrin:

Danke. I thought I'd tried that once or twice.

Is there still a remnant of vB's default Advanced Search? Is there a linky anywhere on a page? A backdoor way, somehow?

It IRC dead here now?

Why not?

They were listed in order.


In my context, I'm thinking not of the OP, but of the forum regular trying to quickly find an answer s/he feels best addresses the problem. (Regulars are people too....

For a particular case for me:

http://www.daniweb.com/code/search.php?q=strcpy

http://clusty.com/search?query=site%3Adaniweb.com%2Fcode%20strcpy

...

It's a bit difficult for me to do as suggested because "reverse engineering" is indeed what I am after. I want to find existing code snippets that I know are here, but I can't do that with the search...

:icon_lol:
Twitter and the like ought not have the same issue.
(?)

I was kind of hoping that this search (http://www.daniweb.com/search/search.php?q=strcpy&what=code) (or at least this one (http://www.daniweb.com/search/search.php?q=strcpy+Dave+Sinkula&what=code))...

Do the writers ever do that themselves? Sharing to the vast number of services? Even just a quick Tweet?

http://www.daniweb.com/search/search.php?q=strcpy+code+snippet doesn't seem to produce the results I would like.