Forum: Website Reviews Mar 17th, 2007 |
| Replies: 10 Views: 2,755 Its not cheap its froogle :P.
I would say that the banner at the top needs improvement. It should be more sharp. Same with the menu. Something that may help would be to relocate your links at the... |
Forum: Website Reviews Sep 20th, 2005 |
| Replies: 4 Views: 1,829 Not bad, I agree about the resolution, the standard is changing to 1024 although most people with eye-sight problems use a larger resolution. And everyone who is older has eye-sight problems. Seeya
... |
Forum: Website Reviews Sep 20th, 2005 |
| Replies: 2 Views: 1,609 Someone... anyone? lol :P |
Forum: Website Reviews Sep 18th, 2005 |
| Replies: 3 Views: 1,728 I like it, theres some flash, but its not loaded down with it so old pcs can actually run it. Very professional |
Forum: Website Reviews Sep 18th, 2005 |
| Replies: 24 Views: 7,108 Alright, so I would have to say, although the flash is very professional, it won't run smoothly on a pc older than a 733, and in many cases won't run at all. If you are looking for the site to be... |
Forum: Website Reviews Sep 18th, 2005 |
| Replies: 6 Views: 1,997 Get a template! That's my advice, there are a lot of free templates on the internet where you can edit pictures and stuff (just have to give a shout out to the creator of it), but they look very... |
Forum: Website Reviews Sep 18th, 2005 |
| Replies: 2 Views: 1,609 Alright so I've been working on these two sites, not extremely impressive, but I want to know what you think I could do to make them look more professional. Ideas about advertisement arrangement? I'm... |
Forum: Website Reviews Apr 16th, 2005 |
| Replies: 31 Views: 6,706 I don't know if you are trying to be really serious or anything, and its fine if you aren't, but I would take out the nature photos. They are cool looking and everything, but they just don't fit with... |