1. This is a VS template. Install it first.
2. Open VS and create a web site using the newly installed template.
3. The main folder of your new web site contains (amongst the others) the file...

Take a look at the PhotoHandler here: http://www.asp.net/downloads/starter-kits/personal/

Try to clean the project/website by deleting the binaries (in C:\WINDOWS\Microsoft.NET\Framework\v2.0.50727\Temporary ASP.NET Files) then rebuild the application. asp.net uses "shadow copy" of...

javascript is especially useful serverside, where ASP.NET is absolutely weak... ;) from this point on you can guess my answer. Or maybe we wouldn't need servers in the future...

Maybe you mean Visual Studio 2005? You can't - use SSMS (SQL Server Management Studio).

First of all the line must throw an exception. Take a look and you'll find out why.
Second, using a switch is the preferred coding practice in such cases.
Third, it is not possible that the code...

What xml files?!? This is new to this thread! Just type SCHEMA TRANSFER in SSMS (Sql Server Management Studio) followed by the tablename. That's all you have to do.

Just create the schema and use SCHEMA TRANSFER to move objects to your newly created schema. After you have your table(s) in the schema you will be able to issue absolutely the same (syntactically)...

You should have
in your web.config. The line is allowed only within appSettings section. The section appSettings should be one and only one in the whole config file.

Nevermind! You still have two appConfig sections. The fact that the first one does not have child nodes does not mean that the sections are getting merged or otherwise processed by the configuration...

You may use schema in MSSQL: Thus your query would look the same.

This is exactly what you have to expect! You cannot modify web.config from the web application/web site/web service that is configured from this web.config. Just remember that fact as if it is an...

This is what is wrong. You have two appSettings sections: an empty one (the above) and your modified one. You should keep only one of them.
If you find this answer satisfactory, please add to my...

The point is not sending, but viewing the messages. The messages for a user should carry some information about the receiver. Most probably the MembershipUser provider key. Check for authenticated...

Perhaps it is better to spend some time and learn the answers to such important questions instead of placing incredibly low bids on sites like www.rentacoder.com

Kids often do more important things than adults. Read "The Little Prince" by Antoine de Saint-Exupéry to get to the point. (Or many other books...)

More than ASP.NET? You gotta be kidding. :) PHP is poor man's ASP.NET, but if you like it go for it!

...or you can use Mono, Apache, Linux and MySQL if expenses are critical for you. This is still ASP.NET.

In general set the @Page attribute trace="true" to locate the control. Then you'll easily figure out how to "FilndControl()" it. Read MSDN on FindControl() also. This should be enough!

don't do that! there are at least two other options SQL server offers:
1. use autoincrement fields, or
2. use guids
In either case the server will handle the creation of new value for a PK.

Your question is not quite clear. What do you want to do? Be more precise in order to get answered.

You have at least two choices:
1. use the lock(...) in C#, or use SqlTransaction (http://www.knowdotnet.com/articles/transactions.html) ; there should be only one instance of the application...

You need your brain and your fingers. No link can help you.

www.codeplex.com

HttpSesssion (if that's what you mean) has nothing to do with vs200x. If you merge both projects you'll be able to use same session in any page despite its original belonging. Otherwise you should...

Often controls are buried into deeper level of control hierarchy. Obviously the control you were trying to find is not in the next level. Add trace="true" in your Page directive attributes and try to...

Again, almost! C# goes a bit closer to the CLR specs...

Depends on your preferences - whatever you choose the results are (almost!) the same. My preferences, however, tend to C#. Moreover C# utilizes .NET CLR capabilities a bit better than VB.