You really should comment your code.
And on a side note check out cin.ignore(); after cin>>'ing.

Hmm. I dunno.
I was demonstrating how to loop around safe bounds, not how to handle exceptions.
What's the point in throwing a throw if you're not gonna catch just for the throw when I know it's...

If you want a 2d vector you can do something like:
#include <iostream>
#include <vector>

// These just make the notation used in the program easier
typedef std::vector<float> xVec;
typedef...

Consider what happens if all the numbers in the array are negative. Then the if(a[i]>max) will never return true. There are two ways you can do this. Either set max to INT_MIN or set max to a[0] and...

No.

Everyone thinks the one they use is the best. Do something that makes sense. Nobody will complain too much so long as it's sensible.

I'd imagine if you were to wait in the for loop for about a second per iteration it'd be different.

The problem is that you're reseeding the rand function so quickly it's being reseeded off the...

You should read about getline here, http://www.cplusplus.com/reference/iostream/istream/getline/

Personally, I'd use std::string-s and getline... #include <string>
#include <fstream>
#include...

Well, there are two common ways you can represent complex numbers. One is a+ib where i is the root of -1, which is NOT -1. This is called the Cartesian (or rectangular) coordinate system. The second...

Why don't you just do myArray[counterArray] = new unsigned long; in the allocation loop? And don't forget to delete everything too! Considering what you basically want is a 50-element array why don't...

The simplest thing I can think of is to use some kind of pop3 library... I'm sure there are probably some available. ( first hit -- http://www.marshallsoft.com/see_4c.htm No idea on how good it is )...

So it's better to have base-protected-getters than protected variables?

If all you want to do is wait for a while you can use sleep...:
#include <windows.h>
int main() {
// Do something
Sleep( 1000 ); // Sleep( miliseconds );
// Do more somethings
return 0;...

Don't forget that you need a ; at the end of your class defn -

class class_name {
// ...
};

In C when you created a struct and didn't define it with a typedef you'd have to say:

struct...

Wow. We give out about people not giving us enough code all the time ... but all the code... one would think it's a good thing...
However, I, for one, am not going to look at any of them. I think...

>> I didn't compile or test this so it might contain errors
Neither using namespace std nor std::s are there! Neither is iostream. Tut tut tut.

void Student::input ( )
{
cout << "This program reads a student name and the number and name of the classes.\n" ;

cout << "Enter the student name: " << flush ;
getline ( cin , name...

>> That's all?
Is that a question or a statement?

>> I just don't get why to got rid of all their code which just needed an extra line to make it valid.
I don't get why you keep on...

>> feel yourself unequipped to defend it
I did defend it:
Gah!

>> OP needed was another line of code to make their original statement valid.
Function.
Yes. But the OP's underlying...

>> Is it.
I believe so anyway.

>> Clarity is paramount over everything else.
I agree, but I don't find the code I presented to be particularily (or in earnest any way), confusing. Do you? If...

Just cause it's easier:

bool eq1( int &v1, int &v2 ) {
if ( v1 == v2 )
return true;
else
return false;
}
bool eq2( int &v1, int &v2 ) {
return (v1==v2 ? true : false);

OK.

You know you can do:

if ( something == something_else ) { ... }

If something does indeed equal something_else then the parameters return true through the == operator, right (and if it...

About the spaces it might be worth making a string to do them rather than looping:

#include <iostream>
#include <string>

int main( void ) {
std::string spaces( 10, ' ' );
std::cout<< '#'...

What you've gotta remember is that there you're going to have to delete the pointer to second in first's member destructer - unless I've misunderstood whenever you use new you must use delete. So...