Forum: HTML and CSS  Nov 1st, 2009 |
| Replies: 3 Views: 445 First validate your page. There is currently at least one problem:
Sorry, I am unable to validate this document because on line 154 it contained one or more bytes that I cannot interpret as... |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Oct 22nd, 2009 |
| Replies: 8 Views: 425 XHTML cannot be served as XHTML because the most-used browser wouldn't know what to do with it. IE will offer to download the file is it is served as XHTML.
If it is not served as XHTML, then all... |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Oct 21st, 2009 |
| Replies: 4 Views: 399 It would help if you posted a URL. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Oct 21st, 2009 |
| Replies: 8 Views: 425 Note that w3schools has nothing to do with the W3 Consortium, and much of its information is inaccurate. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Oct 19th, 2009 |
| Replies: 8 Views: 425 Start with:
<!DOCTYPE html PUBLIC "-//W3C//DTD HTML 4.01//EN" "http://www.w3.org/TR/html4/strict.dtd">
<html lang="en">
<head>
<title>YOUR PAGE TITLE HERE</title>
<link href=""... |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Oct 7th, 2009 |
| Replies: 7 Views: 576 That even more bizarre. Does it work anywhere? |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Oct 7th, 2009 |
| Replies: 7 Views: 576 There is no need to comment out the style rules, and hasn't been since Netscape 4.
Where did you come up with that? It's nonsense! Did you even try it? |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Oct 4th, 2009 |
| Replies: 7 Views: 576 a:hover
{
background-color: blue;
color: white;
} |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Oct 4th, 2009 |
| Replies: 8 Views: 512 I still don't see a white line (1900px window). (How can there be one, the background is white.) |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Oct 4th, 2009 |
| Replies: 3 Views: 563 A <p> element cannot contain another block-level element. A <p> is implicitly ended when another block-level element is encountered. Add the colours to the <ol>s directly. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Oct 4th, 2009 |
| Replies: 8 Views: 512 (I don't see a white line).
Don't use frames; use CSS. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Sep 27th, 2009 |
| Replies: 2 Views: 273 Why do you want it in XHTML? It serves no function, as it must be served as HTML or Internet Explorer will not be able to do anything with it. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Sep 27th, 2009 |
| Replies: 2 Views: 411 Before you do anything else, check with http://validator.w3.org that your code is correct. If it isn't, fix it, then post a URL here if there are still problems. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS May 27th, 2009 |
| Replies: 19 Views: 1,480 MSIE doesn't understand XHTML if it is served properly; if it is served as text/html (so that IE will display it) you lose whatever benefit there might be to XHTML. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS May 24th, 2009 |
| Replies: 19 Views: 1,480 Why is it XHTML, and why is it transitional?
Why do you have:
<div id="navigation">
<div id="nav-container">
... |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Mar 30th, 2009 |
| Replies: 32 Views: 3,259 Can you provide screenshots that demonstrate that?
If there is a problem, it should be fixable with CSS.
No, you don't. That's probably what is causing your problems. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Mar 26th, 2009 |
| Replies: 2 Views: 712 The first step is always to validate your page and correct any HTML and CSS errors. Your page has 551 HTML errors:
Errors found while checking this document as XHTML 1.0 Strict!
Result: 551... |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Mar 25th, 2009 |
| Replies: 32 Views: 3,259 Is this what you want: http://cfaj.freeshell.org/testing/MidiMagic.html? |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Replies: 2 Views: 368 |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Replies: 5 Views: 1,091 Use Server-Side Includes, e.g.:
<!--#include file="page.html" -->
Or:
<!--#include file="header.html" --> |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Replies: 32 Views: 3,259 They will if you do it correctly.
Do you have an example? Please post a URL.
They certainly do! |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Mar 23rd, 2009 |
| Replies: 15 Views: 1,162 No tag can contain another tag. An element can contain another element. Elements are delimited by tags.
The P element cannot contain any block-level element, and since its closing tag is optional,... |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Mar 13th, 2009 |
| Replies: 32 Views: 3,259 Of course! That's what tables are for.
In fact, it can work with fairly complicated layouts. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Mar 10th, 2009 |
| Replies: 32 Views: 3,259 Yes, so am I.
Me, too.
If you use absolute measures they cannot expand. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Mar 10th, 2009 |
| Replies: 15 Views: 1,162 Lists are block-level objects, but they can only contain <li> elements; <li> elements are also block-level, and they can contain anything. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Mar 9th, 2009 |
| Replies: 32 Views: 3,259 Almost all browsers (including IE since 6) do comply with most of the standards. It is not hard to write CSS that works in all browsers. It means avoiding some things that IE doesn't do correctly,... |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Mar 6th, 2009 |
| Replies: 15 Views: 1,162 Apart from being semantic nonsense, it requires unnecessarily bloated CSS to style the lists. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Feb 24th, 2009 |
| Replies: 4 Views: 2,710 Starting with IE6, they are rendered correctly when in standards mode, but not in quirks mode. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Feb 22nd, 2009 |
| Replies: 2 Views: 543 What does "nothing happens" mean? What does happen? What do you want to happen?
First, check your code with http://validator.w3.org. Once your code is error free, post the URL so we can see what... |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Feb 22nd, 2009 |
| Replies: 2 Views: 2,220 First, check your page with the validator at validator.w3.org. If there are still problems after you have corrected the errors, post a URL so that we can see what you are really doing. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Feb 22nd, 2009 |
| Replies: 4 Views: 2,710 Text containers should generally not be given fixed px widths; use ems or percentages instead.
Firefox is behaving correctly. IE is not, probably because you are causing it to enter quirks... |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Feb 7th, 2009 |
| Replies: 10 Views: 1,011 DreamWeaver is the best of a bad bunch.
I agree with ingeva: use a text editor. Find one with syntax highlighting and automatic indentation; I use GNU/Emacs. |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Jan 16th, 2009 |
| Replies: 6 Views: 754 Is this really how you want it to look?
http://cfaj.freeshell.org/testing/incorde.jpg
http://cfaj.freeshell.org/testing/incorde2.jpg |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Jan 12th, 2009 |
| Replies: 4 Views: 2,309 Why XHTML and why transitional?
The HTML comment hasn't been necessary since Netscape 4.
table
{
border-collapse: collapse; |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Jan 12th, 2009 |
| Replies: 8 Views: 1,229 It is barely possible, and to do it requires making an assumption about the height of the footer.
The closest you can easily do is something like this:... |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Jan 10th, 2009 |
| Replies: 14 Views: 1,845 How about a URL? What you posted is not a complete page, and may not appear the same as on your page (if anyone takes the trouble to copy it to a file). |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Jan 10th, 2009 |
| Replies: 2 Views: 7,289 Good HTML is not XHTML.
The move to XHTML is not gradual; it is halted. MSIE does not support XHTML, and cannot even display it if it is served correctly. There are no plans for it ever to... |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Jan 10th, 2009 |
| Replies: 14 Views: 1,845 Can you provide a URL showing the problem? |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Jan 8th, 2009 |
| Replies: 22 Views: 1,743 <li> is a block-level element, not inline.
http://cfaj.freeshell.org/testing/li-width.html |
| Forum: HTML and CSS Jan 7th, 2009 |
| Replies: 22 Views: 1,743 Of course you can set a width for a list item. |
