What's the string outputted by your echo statement? Can you look at the page source and paste the exact output your see in view source? Also, this (http://www.jsonlint.com/)might help.

> is it impossible to do it without that active x?

AFAIK, yes, it's not possible.

Thinking about it in this way might help your cause:

power(2, 3) =>

- 2 * power(2, 2)
- 2 * (2 * power(2, 1))
- 2 * (2 * (2 * power(2, 0)))
- 2 * (2 * (2 * 1))
- 2 * (2 * 2)

To start off, compare the HTML markup generated by both the pages; the page which works and the page which doesn't. What difference can you see?

Another option would be to Firebug, the excellent...

As long as you are using IMG tags to render images, you can use the document.images collection rather than the usual document.getElementById function to grab image references. Regarding the innerHTML...

Just to set the context straight here:

Since in this particular case the ID of the image is known, there is no harm in using the `images' collection though getElementById also works.

Using the...

> Suggest not using image collection as you need to know the index
> of the image in question.

No you don't; please don't spread FUD.
var myImg = document.images['your_img_id'];
//OR
var...

> if(w.blur)w.focus();

This checks the `blur' property of the window object and not if the window is having focus or not. Anyways, this isn't required, you can directly invoke the focus()...

> Hello, I have a form inside a form.

If possible, reconsider (http://bytes.com/groups/html/95602-nested-forms) your design choice; nested forms violate the HTML specification.

So, what doesn't seem to be working? Start off with a minimalistic approach rather than trying to incorporate the functionality into your existing complicated code. Use an excellent Firefox addon...

Use the class attribute of a HTML element [accessed in Javascript using the className property] for convenient grouping; for each new checkbox spawned, assign it a common class name like...

It's not OK, the return statement must go inside the catch block even when the function's contract is such that it *never* returns `null' for any input [as is the case with getElementsByTagName].
...

> The error console in firefox does not display any errors.

IMO then it can only mean two things:
- Either the Javascript on the entire page is disabled causing the script not to be executed.
-...

> could not install it due to some errors

Upgrade to a newer version of Firefox and then try it; ideally there shouldn't be any problems. What is the error you are getting?

Anyways, like I...

The browser in use can make a difference, the OS doesn't. Which browser are you using on Linux? If Firefox, try using the Firebug addon which provides Javascript debugging capabilities. For looking...

> Hi, i have made those changes

It seems you haven't since I still see the call "MM_callJS('order(this.form)')"; re-read reply 10.

Either of them would do; the point I was trying to put across is that for comparison use the == or === operator instead of = operator. Though, using switch seems to be the logical solution here.

Have you made the fix suggested in my previous post? Re-post the entire code and point out the line which is having problems.

> MM_callJS('order(form1)')

Replace the above with order(this.form);.

> and i also change the form1 in my function to this.form

Like I mentioned, change form1 to this.form only in onchange...

For comparison its == or === [strict type safe equals] and not = [assignment operator].
var op = document.getElementById("someId").value;
switch(op) { //switch by default using === operator
case...

> But it is giving error that x is null. Can any one please correct it?

Because the `style' property is only set when inline style sheets are used. To get the style details of the element whose...

Rather than using the window.open() function, use the URL passed in the function as the value of the HREF attribute of the ANCHOR element.document.write('<a href="<?php echo $product_flypage ?>">');...

I already provided the fix in my previous post. If what you posted really is your code then you shouldn't have problem understanding the fix I suggested. Anyways like I mentioned, you need to replace...

Use the focus() function of the DOM element to focus on the given element.

It is only in IE[and some other buggy browsers] that the NAME or ID attribute of an element represents the element in consideration; which actually isn't correct. You actually need to grab the...

Sifting through that massive piece of code would be time consuming. If developing on Firefox, look into the Firebug addon which adds capabilities like Javascript debugging, error detection etc. Look...

There is a better way of doing the same thing which encodes the URI component to avoid all such problems:
encodeURIComponent("a,b,c"); // a%2Cb%2Cc

The number of requests is not the issue here; after all, web servers are tailored to handle several concurrent requests simultaneously.

> its 255 chars isnt it?

No, it isn't.

> where ans could be upto 10000 charecters

I have been successful in sending more than 33,000 characters when posting data [Tomcat 6.0] both...

Consider using a mature Javascript library like jQuery or Prototype which abstracts away almost all browser inconsistencies and quirks. That way, you would be able to build web applications which...

Questions related to specific Javascript libraries are better asked in the respective forums (http://dojotoolkit.org/forum) for a quicker response.

It most likely seems to be a Javascript error which is causing your script to execute intermittently. Using Firebug should show you all the errors along with the line numbers; if you still aren't...

What do you mean by *doesn't work*? No output, doesn't work as expected?

Use Firefox with the Firebug addon for development which provides a means of debugging Javascript code, inspecting...

> I worked with ajax, I can do this with a submit button, but when I i
> put the form tag, not work any more.

It worked because Ajax doesn't depend on a FORM element for shipping data to and...

Given that the problem description is pretty abstract, there isn't much I can comment on though here are a few thoughts.

I am pretty sure there is nothing which an advanced Javascript toolkit like...

> Is there a way to display the source of the iframe or the html file
> that is being displayed in the iframe in the web browsers address
> bar?

AFAIK, no. It seems pretty logical that the URL...

> is there any solution that IE will not block my java script so the IE
> user's can directly see it

Simply put, no, otherwise there would be little point in providing security settings for...

If you want to execute an action [i.e. send a HTTP request] without reloading the page, you have two options:
- Remote scripting via hidden IFRAME...

Checking out that huge chunk of code for Javascript errors is quite a herculean task.

To ease your development, I would recommend that you carry out your development testing in Firefox and make...

On the mentioned web page there are no frames, only inline frames; they are different things and also handled differently.

In the second URL you posted, the function invoked on a link click is...