Forum: Assembly Mar 26th, 2007 |
| Replies: 26 Views: 5,950 There are plenty of tools and libraries (most of which, if not all, are free) available.
No hard at all. 32-bit windows MASM code, for example, looks almost like C (function declarations,... |
Forum: Assembly Mar 25th, 2007 |
| Replies: 26 Views: 5,950 Speak for yourself! For me, there is no need to program in any other language.
Antonis |
Forum: Assembly Feb 3rd, 2007 |
| Replies: 34 Views: 9,751 Huge, slow applications do have impact on my efficiency. I hate bulky applications.
If one cannot write easily maintainable, flexible code it's not the language's problem.
You could be more... |
Forum: Assembly Feb 3rd, 2007 |
| Replies: 34 Views: 9,751 no comment
WinAsm Studio IDE (and other IDE's I know of) can do it in less than a minute. I can upload any windows application of this kind here and tell you how to do it within this time... |
Forum: Assembly Feb 3rd, 2007 |
| Replies: 34 Views: 9,751 Fully agree. This is why I use Assembly for all my programming needs. What I write is what my final binary will be. It 's only up to me to write good or bad code.
other things being equal,... |
Forum: Assembly Feb 2nd, 2007 |
| Replies: 34 Views: 9,751 And YOUR conclusion is: no matter what language you use or what code you write, final binaries will have the same speed ...
My conclusion: Assembly language can produce by far the fastest and... |
Forum: Assembly Feb 1st, 2007 |
| Replies: 34 Views: 9,751 Yes I 've developed the free IDE because I had believed in Assembly and not the other way round! Please bear in mind that I 've programmed with some HLL's for years before that. And yes, I was not... |
Forum: Assembly Feb 1st, 2007 |
| Replies: 34 Views: 9,751 @pty:
Who told you so? Having the right tools it is easier. Do yourself a favor get the right tools and try 32-bit assembly for a couple of days.
I insist. Just try it for a while. With... |
Forum: Assembly Jan 31st, 2007 |
| Replies: 34 Views: 9,751 No compiler can produce faster binaries than what assembly can do (written correctly offcourse)
still remains a 5%. why should I use C and assembly while I can be equally productive using... |
Forum: Assembly Jan 31st, 2007 |
| Replies: 34 Views: 9,751 Assembly Language can produce small and very fast applications, no bloat, no dependencies (huge dll's), VERY easy to develop and above all, I can do anything I want without facing any HLL... |
Forum: Assembly Jan 31st, 2007 |
| Replies: 26 Views: 5,950 My programs are intended to be used under Windows 32-bit or 16-bit DOS. Others target linux or other OS's, but yes, I don't develop cross platform applications. Other than that, I am able to develop... |
Forum: Assembly Jan 30th, 2007 |
| Replies: 12 Views: 16,722 Please let me add the WinAsm Studio (http://www.winasm.net) site. You can find the WinAsm Studio IDE, HiEditor (large file editor), custom controls, Add-Ins for WinAsm Studio and a lot more.
... |
Forum: Assembly Jan 30th, 2007 |
| Replies: 34 Views: 9,751 This is completely wrong! Assembly language is very easy ;) and can be used to develop any kind of application. Have a look at this article (http://www.codeproject.com/useritems/assembleriseasy.asp)... |
Forum: Community Introductions Jan 30th, 2007 |
| Replies: 1 Views: 859 Hi,
I am Antonis Kyprianou and I use the Assembly Language for all my programming needs. From the WinAsm Studio site you can find a lot of free tools (WinAsm Studio IDE, HiEditor (a large file... |
Forum: Assembly Jan 30th, 2007 |
| Replies: 26 Views: 5,950 Hi,
After having developed software using HLL's for years, now I use Assembly Language for ALL my programming needs: small and very fast applications, no bloat, no dependencies (huge dll's), VERY... |