| | |
2008 US Presidential Poll
| View Poll Results: Who's your preference? | |||
| (D) Hillary Clinton | | 20 | 19.05% |
| (D) Barack Obama | | 44 | 41.90% |
| (D) John Edwards | | 7 | 6.67% |
| (R) Rudi Guliani | | 1 | 0.95% |
| (R) Mitt Romney | | 5 | 4.76% |
| (R) John McCain | | 12 | 11.43% |
| (R) Mike Huckabee | | 6 | 5.71% |
| (R) Fred Thompson | | 8 | 7.62% |
| (R) Ron Paul | | 18 | 17.14% |
| Other | | 9 | 8.57% |
| Multiple Choice Poll. Voters: 105. You may not vote on this poll | |||
![]() |
•
•
•
•
Can somebody explain to me how presidential elections work? Why are Clinton and Obama both Democrats? Aren't they sort of running against each other?
I don't get it...
The Democratic National Convention will be held in Denver Colorado on Monday, August 25 to Thursday, August 28.
The Republican National Convention will be held in Minneapolis-Saint Paul Minnesota from September 1-4
The US Presidential Election will be held on November 8, 2008. The US American people do not vote directly for the President and Vice President, but instead vote for electors who meet in January to elect the President. And the new President and VP assume office in January 20.
Last edited by Ancient Dragon; Jan 2nd, 2008 at 6:27 pm.
Don't PM me with questions -- you might get a nasty PM in response. If you have a question then post it in one of the forums.
•
•
•
•
Can somebody explain to me how presidential elections work? <snip>
I don't get it...
The election is when the party workers make sure they get as many people to the polls as possible, whether eligible or not, dead or alive, to cast their votes. The news media will predict the winner 10 minutes after the polls open, based on interviews with the first 20 people to have voted. This then influences the other 100,000,000 potential voters as to whether they should bother.
Unfortunately, the people who would probably make good presidents have sense enough to stay out of the race.
Sometimes I wish there was a box on the ballot - "None of the above"
Val
Last edited by vmanes; Jan 3rd, 2008 at 12:40 am.
Everyone's gotta believe in something. I believe I'll have another drink.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Looking for an exciting graduate degree? Robotics and Intelligent Autonomous Systems (RIAS) at SDSM&T See the program brochure here.
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
Looking for an exciting graduate degree? Robotics and Intelligent Autonomous Systems (RIAS) at SDSM&T See the program brochure here.
People only vote for the "electable" candidate who must be the media-anointed one who gets money, perhaps?
"One of the methods used by statists to destroy capitalism consists in establishing controls that tie a given industry hand and foot, making it unable to solve its problems, then declaring that freedom has failed and stronger controls are necessary." --Ayn Rand
I'm preparing my conspiracy theories as we speak!
"One of the methods used by statists to destroy capitalism consists in establishing controls that tie a given industry hand and foot, making it unable to solve its problems, then declaring that freedom has failed and stronger controls are necessary." --Ayn Rand
Well, at least remember the Chicago phrase:
Vote early, vote often!
Vote early, vote often!
"One of the methods used by statists to destroy capitalism consists in establishing controls that tie a given industry hand and foot, making it unable to solve its problems, then declaring that freedom has failed and stronger controls are necessary." --Ayn Rand
The reason that we always get an oddball in office is that there is a bias in the Plurality Voting System we use.
Whenever more than two candidates run, the Plurality Voting System is biased in favor of the candidate most unlike the others.
So the primaries and the national conventions will pick the oddest Democrat and the oddest Republican to face each other.
Then, if there are other parties running in the general election, the Plurality Vote will select the odder of the two candidates mentioned above.
The existence of a third party in the race actually changed the outcome of the Presidential election in 1992 and 2000 (and several other years before 1930). In 1992, Ross Perot handed the election to Bill Clinton just by running, and in 2000, Ralph Nader handed the election to George W Bush.
Whenever more than two candidates run, the Plurality Voting System is biased in favor of the candidate most unlike the others.
So the primaries and the national conventions will pick the oddest Democrat and the oddest Republican to face each other.
Then, if there are other parties running in the general election, the Plurality Vote will select the odder of the two candidates mentioned above.
The existence of a third party in the race actually changed the outcome of the Presidential election in 1992 and 2000 (and several other years before 1930). In 1992, Ross Perot handed the election to Bill Clinton just by running, and in 2000, Ralph Nader handed the election to George W Bush.
Daylight-saving time uses more gasoline
![]() |
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum
- Previous Thread: Oh My Gosh...
- Next Thread: Funny political cartoons
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
advice amazon apple article bankrupt bear beard beijing books bot chat children clocks code comedy complaint console consoles convert daniweb development disk dlc ebook facebook feed financialcrisis fun future game games gaming garbage google gta gtaiv halo3 happiness hardware information internet java kids knife language larnyx library linux love lynx mad madden microsoft murder neuropathology news nintendo obama olympics operating opinion os outlook pain parentalcontrol playstation population programming ps3 python research school search software softwaredevelopment sony source space starteam stocks subversion survey systems tablet thelostanddamned time tinfoil_hat videogames walmart wave wii windows windows>all windows_wins world worldofwarcraft wow www xbox xbox360






