| | |
question about Shockwave player on MacBooks:
![]() |
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
As you might already know, Macs were previously PowerPC-based, and in the last few years or so they've brought in the new Macs with Intel chipsets. What this essentially meant is that all software written for PowerPC-based Macs had to be rewritten to be compatible with the new Intel Macs. The problem right now is that Shockwave hasn't been rewritten for the Intel Macs (yet).
However, Apple included an emulation technology in the new Macs which would help with backwards-compatibility issues, called Rosetta. It is possible to run Shockwave under Rosetta, however, it requires running on a web browser that is also running on Rosetta. What this means for you is that you'll have to run Safari (or Firefox, if you prefer) in Rosetta mode not only to install, but every time you wish to use Shockwave player. It's not a great solution, but it's the best one that's available to you at the moment.
However, Apple included an emulation technology in the new Macs which would help with backwards-compatibility issues, called Rosetta. It is possible to run Shockwave under Rosetta, however, it requires running on a web browser that is also running on Rosetta. What this means for you is that you'll have to run Safari (or Firefox, if you prefer) in Rosetta mode not only to install, but every time you wish to use Shockwave player. It's not a great solution, but it's the best one that's available to you at the moment.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
I don't think I've ever needed Shockwave Player, not even once. Most of the dynamic, colorful websites use Flash, which works quite well on the Intel Macs. And Shockwave Player doesn't even seem to be a huge priority for Adobe at the moment (probably for the reason mentioned above), although the way they write their article, they seem to imply they will port it eventually.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
![]() |
Other Threads in the IT Professionals' Lounge Forum
- Previous Thread: hi to all
- Next Thread: 2007: The worst in tech
Views: 1724 | Replies: 9
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Tag cloud for IT Professionals' Lounge
1gbit advice amazon answers archive british broadband business businessprocesses career carrier censorship cern china cio collectiveintelligence connectivity consumer consumers corporateearnings css datatransfer debtcollectors dictionary digital ebay ecommerce email employment environment facebook government grid high-definition hottub infodelivery infotech intel internet interview ipod isp japan kindle lhc library malware marketing mit moonfruit news onlineshopping php piracy piratebay pope porn program r&d religion remoteworking research retail schools sex shopping simple skype smallbusiness smb sms socialmedia socialnetworking softwareengineer spam speed spending ssl startrek statistics stocks study stumbleupon survey tabletpc technology touch-screen touchscreen training twitter uk vbulletin videoinprint voips vulnerability web webdesign webdeveloper windows words







