| | |
Windows XP to *nix backup
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 22
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I'm looking to develop a new strategy to provide both an on-site and off-site backup of my computer, which runs Windows XP.
The good news is I have shell access to a Solaris machine through my university, and my storage allocation on this server more than sufficient to back up everything. I also have some spare computers on-hand that I can use for an on-site backup machine. So I'd like to set up a system wherein:
Here are my queries:
I's appreciate any suggestions you might have. Thanks very much in advance...
Steven
The good news is I have shell access to a Solaris machine through my university, and my storage allocation on this server more than sufficient to back up everything. I also have some spare computers on-hand that I can use for an on-site backup machine. So I'd like to set up a system wherein:
- My main computer backs up to an on-site backup server each night.
- My backup server connects (over cable modem) to the remote university server the next day and updates those files. (I would expect the daily updates to be generally 100-200 MB at most.)
Here are my queries:
- I don't know all that much about *nix, but have read that rsync is the way to go for remote backups. Would it then be best/easiest if my on-site machine were set up on *nix as well? I assume I could then SSH/rsync to that server?
- If my backup server runs *nix, is it better to have it connect to my XP box via Samba, and fetch the files? Or to use some sort of XP to *nix backup program? (Note: I just need to backup 'My Documents', not do a full system backup/restore.) I would like, if at all possibe, not to use Cygwin.
- I need to encrypt the files on the university server for security. I don't care if my on-site backup is encrypted. Is it better for to have my on-site backup machine connect to my XP box via Samba, and fetch the files? Or to use some sort of XP to *nix backup program? At what point should I encrypt? (Note: I just need to backup 'My Documents', not do a full system backup/restore.)
- What happens to Windows file permissions when going to *nix?
I's appreciate any suggestions you might have. Thanks very much in advance...
Steven
•
•
•
•
I don't know all that much about *nix, but have read that rsync is the way to go for remote backups. Would it then be best/easiest if my on-site machine were set up on *nix as well? I assume I could then SSH/rsync to that server?
•
•
•
•
If my backup server runs *nix, is it better to have it connect to my XP box via Samba, and fetch the files? Or to use some sort of XP to *nix backup program? (Note: I just need to backup 'My Documents', not do a full system backup/restore.)
•
•
•
•
I need to encrypt the files on the university server for security. I don't care if my on-site backup is encrypted. Is it better for to have my on-site backup machine connect to my XP box via Samba, and fetch the files? Or to use some sort of XP to *nix backup program? At what point should I encrypt? (Note: I just need to backup 'My Documents', not do a full system backup/restore.)
•
•
•
•
What happens to Windows file permissions when going to *nix?
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
All my posts may be freely redistributed under the terms of the MIT license.
•
•
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 22
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Okay, this makes a lot of sense to me. I guess the one wrinkle is that while the daily changes are on the order of 100-200 MB, the entire dataset right now is about 200GB. I know that rsync is efficient because it basically only sends the parts of files that have changed. But I wonder how the file encryption would affect the rsync efficiency, particularly if I have one big archive as opposed to maintaining individual files?
In other words, if I have an encrypted archive, does that prevent rsync from seeing only the portions that have been altered, and thus require it so send the whole 200GB?
In other words, if I have an encrypted archive, does that prevent rsync from seeing only the portions that have been altered, and thus require it so send the whole 200GB?
•
•
Join Date: Jul 2006
Posts: 22
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I just found some info on rsyncrypto, which apparently allows you to rsync encrypted files. The tradeoff is that the encryption is slightly weaker. This is a tradeoff I can live with, so I think I'm good to go.
Thanks!
Thanks!
![]() |
Similar Threads
- huge annoying antispylab problem requiring help (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- my HJT log...i gots problems (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- antispylab on dad's computer :( (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- My HJT log file (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
Other Threads in the *nix Software Forum
- Previous Thread: iPod touch + Ubuntu Linux 7.10
- Next Thread: GTKpod
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |






