Real COM port vs. USB-to-Serial cable

Please support our C advertiser: Programming Forums - DaniWeb Sister Site
Thread Solved

Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,615
Reputation: jephthah has much to be proud of jephthah has much to be proud of jephthah has much to be proud of jephthah has much to be proud of jephthah has much to be proud of jephthah has much to be proud of jephthah has much to be proud of jephthah has much to be proud of 
Solved Threads: 121
jephthah's Avatar
jephthah jephthah is offline Offline
Posting Virtuoso

Re: Real COM port vs. USB-to-Serial cable

 
0
  #11
Feb 13th, 2008
did you get it to work, friendfx?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2008
Posts: 4
Reputation: friendfx is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
friendfx friendfx is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: Real COM port vs. USB-to-Serial cable

 
0
  #12
Sep 29th, 2008
No, but I found the reason of the problem: The USB-to-Serial adapter cable I mentionned has different voltage levels for the logical 0s and 1s so it was not compatible with original COM ports.

Thanks for all your effort!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread has been marked solved.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the C Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC