| | |
Richest man in the world
![]() |
Bill Gates ?? think again because he lost that title in January this year when he tried a hostile takeover of Yahoo. Microsoft stock fell 15% and put poor Bill in the #3 spot behind Warren Buffett (now #1) and Carlos Slim HelĂș from Mexico.
Full article here.
Full article here.
Last edited by Ancient Dragon; Mar 5th, 2008 at 9:29 pm.
Don't PM me with questions -- you might get a nasty PM in response. If you have a question then post it in one of the forums.
Still though... didn't he give away a lot of his money? Or make some charity or something? The margin's not that big. Still though. He was there for a while. I wonder if he'll jump back.
>> He is up $2 billion from a year ago and would have been perhaps as rich -- or richer -- than Buffett had Microsoft not made an unsolicited bid for Yahoo (YHOO, news, msgs) at the beginning of February.
I read something similar before. How was their takeover bid of Yahoo 'unsolicited'? Were Yahoo on the market? Did MS put forward a reasonable price? Were they right to try? How is it unsolicited? It's like saying trying to buy a car is an unsolicited attack on a car manufacturer.
>> He is up $2 billion from a year ago and would have been perhaps as rich -- or richer -- than Buffett had Microsoft not made an unsolicited bid for Yahoo (YHOO, news, msgs) at the beginning of February.
I read something similar before. How was their takeover bid of Yahoo 'unsolicited'? Were Yahoo on the market? Did MS put forward a reasonable price? Were they right to try? How is it unsolicited? It's like saying trying to buy a car is an unsolicited attack on a car manufacturer.
Are you sure it was a hostile takeover attempt? I was under the impression that they approached Yahoo's board who turned them down, resulting in MS taking a hit?
>> Are you sure it was a hostile takeover attempt?
I was quoting from the link. They used the word "unsolicited". I'm of the same opinion, csgal. I thought it was by-the-books. I saw that term being used in at least two other articles too...
I was quoting from the link. They used the word "unsolicited". I'm of the same opinion, csgal. I thought it was by-the-books. I saw that term being used in at least two other articles too...
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 10
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Rich are getting richer and Poor are getting poorer..
Thats how to goes.......
Everybody Knows...
Thanks for sharing anyways
Alley
Thats how to goes.......
Everybody Knows...

Thanks for sharing anyways

Alley
•
•
•
•
The other question should be:
"Who of the richest folks pays the most tax?"
It also doesn't matter, because there are so few rich people that even taxing them 100 percent wont increase the amount of money government has.
The real question to ask is, "Why is government taxing people below the poverty level?"
Daylight-saving time uses more gasoline
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Destiny (Geeks' Lounge)
- Joke! Must Read it...Men Vs. Women (Geeks' Lounge)
- The Bill Gates Legacy: software business genius or philanthropic saint? (IT Professionals' Lounge)
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum
- Previous Thread: A little help please
- Next Thread: ITOUCH vs ARCHOS
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
advice amazon bankruptcy bear beard beijing bot chat clocks comedy complaint console consoles convert cracked.com daniweb design development disk dlc ebook election empty feed fun future game games gaming garbage google gta gtaiv halo3 happiness hardware hunting information internet java kindle knife larnyx linux love lynx madden manly marketing mars merger microsoft netbook neuropathology news nintendo odf olympics opinion os outlook parentalcontrol parenting planning playstation population ps3 ps4 python rss school search sims software softwaredevelopment sony source space starteam stocks study subversion survey tablet thelostanddamned time tinfoil_hat unused vapid videogames viruses walmart wii windows windows>all windows_wins world worldofwarcraft xbox xbox360






