| | |
Windows 2003 DNS
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
The company I work for has a dedicated server with Windows 2003 installed. We primarily use it as a web server and file storage system for our virtual employees.
When I was registering a new domain name at Register.com, I realized that the majority of the domain names we own are not pointed at out DNS server, but instead use the register.com DNS servers. The IP addresses at register.com are then set to our server's IP address.
My question is what would be the best practice?
I can setup a DNS server for the box and then tell all other domains at register.com to use it. Or, I can keep the configuration the same and just tell register.com which IPs to use. As it is right now, it just seems unorganized.
When I was registering a new domain name at Register.com, I realized that the majority of the domain names we own are not pointed at out DNS server, but instead use the register.com DNS servers. The IP addresses at register.com are then set to our server's IP address.
My question is what would be the best practice?
I can setup a DNS server for the box and then tell all other domains at register.com to use it. Or, I can keep the configuration the same and just tell register.com which IPs to use. As it is right now, it just seems unorganized.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 392
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 40
I would point each name directly to your DNS server. Going through register.com's DNS server adds another point of failure.
•
•
Join Date: Apr 2007
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
That's a good point Eric. I hadn't really thought of that. I was thinking that if our server's IP address ever needed to be changed, then I'd have to go back to register.com and manually change the IP address of the 60+ domain names we own.
Do you know if there is a performance hit (on our server) if the 60+ domain names were set to our DNS server (which is on the same physical server that runs our websites, email server, etc)?
Do you know if there is a performance hit (on our server) if the 60+ domain names were set to our DNS server (which is on the same physical server that runs our websites, email server, etc)?
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 392
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 40
I would expect technically there to be a performance hit, since your server is doing more work. In the real world,you probably wouldn't notice depending on your hardware and the current workload.
![]() |
Other Threads in the Windows NT / 2000 / XP Forum
- Previous Thread: How to remove references to previous users?
- Next Thread: Problem while giving permission to a file in windows 2003 server
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
.net 3.5 3daccelertion 64bit 2010 a.exe activedirectory address alaris android application arm auto black blue book bsod bulletin canonical chinese codeplex collaboration combofix computerfreezes cursor deployments desktop domain drive eartlink error explorer fax fonts format framework freeze gadgets hardware home intel interoperability killprocess laptop laptops latitude lcd linux mac markshuttleworth memory microsoft mobile monitor motionle1600 netbooks opensource operatingsystems options osinstallationproblem outlook palm partition printer program proxy raid rds reformat remotedesktop remotedesktopconnection retail retrieve screen security server. sharepoint sitetositevpn slowperformance sp1 sp3 studios technology ubuntu unreadable update upgrade usb verizon videodrivers virtual virus vpn webos weecam windows windows7 windowsxp xp xpde






