| | |
Gamers PC
![]() |
Alright, I was planning to construct a gaming PC to be used for gaming mostly and some media (like Photoshop 7 and such.)
I planned out a guide below on what I want to put inside of it, performance wise for right now and I have not selected the core parts, just my performance idea.
Can I get some thoughts if this will be good enough for what I am seeking:
1. Intel P4 2.6GHz CPU
2. 500W PSU
3. Maxtor 120GB HDD
4. DVD-RW/CD-RW Burner Combo
5. SoundBlaster Audigy Sound Card
6. ATI Radeon 9200 (256MB) Video Card
7. 1GB of Memory
8. {- Still Deciding -} Water Cool System or 120mm Fan
9. PCI Network Card
10. 1.44MB Floppy Disk Drive
That is all the statistics I have for the PC so far, I'll make my final decision on parts at a later date. Another thing I am still deciding is the fact of a water cooling system or fan. Fans are good and last long but I heard water cooling system can be better in some ways that a fan can't, but then again you have to dis-assemble the PC core system to refill with the special water solution.
Anyway, does the above sound like a gaming pc?
I planned out a guide below on what I want to put inside of it, performance wise for right now and I have not selected the core parts, just my performance idea.
Can I get some thoughts if this will be good enough for what I am seeking:
1. Intel P4 2.6GHz CPU
2. 500W PSU
3. Maxtor 120GB HDD
4. DVD-RW/CD-RW Burner Combo
5. SoundBlaster Audigy Sound Card
6. ATI Radeon 9200 (256MB) Video Card
7. 1GB of Memory
8. {- Still Deciding -} Water Cool System or 120mm Fan
9. PCI Network Card
10. 1.44MB Floppy Disk Drive
That is all the statistics I have for the PC so far, I'll make my final decision on parts at a later date. Another thing I am still deciding is the fact of a water cooling system or fan. Fans are good and last long but I heard water cooling system can be better in some ways that a fan can't, but then again you have to dis-assemble the PC core system to refill with the special water solution.
Anyway, does the above sound like a gaming pc?
you should just mod one of the alienware pcs they have some sick pc's for running games and they have announced that they have a comp that runs a pt4 4ghz processor.
Sounds like something that has been overclocked from 3.6GHz, stupid thing is that their prices are expensive. Another place is http://www.go-l.com and they have a desktop pc with 6GHz, now that is OVERCLOCKED for sure.
i donnu get a site that offers something useful and add a paypal doante link to it or just do wat my bro did and put the donate link in his sig. Or mow lawns and shovel snow my bro makes like $300 on a good snow day.
6ghz must be really unstable even overclocking from 3.2 to 3.6 could be unstable on some machines.
6ghz must be really unstable even overclocking from 3.2 to 3.6 could be unstable on some machines.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 144
OK, on topic, eh?
That's a tad light on for a modern gaming rig. Matter of fact, looking at the display card chosen it's a LOT light on!
AMD Athlon64 is currently the best choice for gaming, not Intel. It'll do just as well as the Pentium for Photoshopping as well. Socket 754 is good enough and keeps costs down. Look for a decent and affordable Socket 754 NForce3 250 chipset motherboard, and an Athlon64 3200+ if you can fit it in the budget. Match it with at least 512Mb of PC3200 RAM, and 1Gb is better. Being cooler running than the latest Pentiums, it won't need either water cooling or a 120mm case fan
Display card is the most important factor for games and you shouldn't accept anything less than a Radeon 9600XT or an NVidia FX5900XT bare minimum! A Radeon 9800 Pro is still a decent card and is an affordable option also.
The Athlon64 for socket 754 probably won't go much past 3200+, but the addition of a better display card later on would keep that rig gaming for a long time to come anyway, so it wouldn't matter.
If funds are too tight, you could drop that back to an Athlon64 2800+ and have room for a processor upgrade later as well (although I wouldn't bother personally) and it'd still belt the **** outta that Pentium 2.6GHz
That's a tad light on for a modern gaming rig. Matter of fact, looking at the display card chosen it's a LOT light on!
AMD Athlon64 is currently the best choice for gaming, not Intel. It'll do just as well as the Pentium for Photoshopping as well. Socket 754 is good enough and keeps costs down. Look for a decent and affordable Socket 754 NForce3 250 chipset motherboard, and an Athlon64 3200+ if you can fit it in the budget. Match it with at least 512Mb of PC3200 RAM, and 1Gb is better. Being cooler running than the latest Pentiums, it won't need either water cooling or a 120mm case fan

Display card is the most important factor for games and you shouldn't accept anything less than a Radeon 9600XT or an NVidia FX5900XT bare minimum! A Radeon 9800 Pro is still a decent card and is an affordable option also.
The Athlon64 for socket 754 probably won't go much past 3200+, but the addition of a better display card later on would keep that rig gaming for a long time to come anyway, so it wouldn't matter.
If funds are too tight, you could drop that back to an Athlon64 2800+ and have room for a processor upgrade later as well (although I wouldn't bother personally) and it'd still belt the **** outta that Pentium 2.6GHz
Well, I got speeding through it, and really, media type stuff is more AMD, Intel is said to be a better investment into a gaming PC.
I would get an 3.6GHz but so much for the high price.
I would choose nVidia most likely because of the reason being they are more better. But anyway, I'd rather just do like Mike said, and purchase a Alienware PC for best guessing.
I would get an 3.6GHz but so much for the high price.
I would choose nVidia most likely because of the reason being they are more better. But anyway, I'd rather just do like Mike said, and purchase a Alienware PC for best guessing.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 144
You're living in the past with that idea that Intel Pentium is better for gaming. the Athlon64 processors beat their Pentium equivalents in games performance hands down
What, alright, so you say. AMD is nothing but piece of trash, in gaming wise. Media is what its great for.
Need Website Work... PM Me or EMail Me at mdstreetsoulja@gmail.com ... I am AVAILABLE!
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Affordable Mumble Voice Hosting Server @ $1.95/mo. – VoIP, Crystal Clear, Gamers! (Web Hosting Deals)
- News Story: Nintendo rules UK, OK? (Upcoming News Stories)
- News Story: Gamers 'get' in-game advertising (Upcoming News Stories)
- News Story: The video gamers guide to picking up girls (Upcoming News Stories)
- Sell your Product, Service, Team to GAMERS (Ad Space for Sale)
- Windows vs Linux (IT Professionals' Lounge)
- Woo-woo! (Geeks' Lounge)
- Multipointer Manipulating System and Method (Computer Science)
Other Threads in the Troubleshooting Dead Machines Forum
- Previous Thread: The Sims 2
- Next Thread: weird problem
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
appliances beep bioslosingharddrived bioslosingsettings black bsod citrix cmosbattery compaq cpu dead delldimension4500 failure giving harddrive laptop linux mac mobo neverbuyinspiron1525 nodisplay nopower operatingsystemnotfound osnotfound pc power ram redhat screen supply ubuntu virtualbox virtualization virtualmachines vmware xen






