| | |
Ok, It's Linux time!
![]() |
Ok, so my Dad has finally given up his old laptop, which gives me the chance to play with Linux on it. The only problem is, the hard drive is minute. He estimates it to be 1.2 gigs :\ but it was a long time since he really last checked it, so it could be more..
Basicly, just give me the smallest Linux Distro you know and I'll start my weary job of downloading it....
(I will update this thread if the hard drive is more and I have no need to worry...)
Basicly, just give me the smallest Linux Distro you know and I'll start my weary job of downloading it....
(I will update this thread if the hard drive is more and I have no need to worry...)
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,620
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 51
Hello,
With 1.2 GB, you will be hard pressed to install *everything*. Where you go will depend on what you want the computer to do. Since it is a laptop with limited space, I would suggest the following:
256 MB SWAP partition
/var 300 MB partition (this is where the logs are kept, and will prevent logs overwriting the main volume
/ partition with the rest.
Avoid --
* don't need FTP / WEB / NEWS / MAIL server software
* If you can squeeze the compilers in, do it.
* Choose one X manger -- GNOME or KDE. I prefer GNOME for simplicity... KDE is great if you want more bells and whistles on desktop
* Don't need to install source trees if you don't have compliers
* Choose one set of office programs -- either KOffice or Open Office, not both
You can also consider an older Linux distro, such as RedHat 7.3. With your laptop only having a 1.2 GB hard drive, you might also have RAM restrictions. I know RH 9 wants 64 MB RAM for starters, and the RH 7.3 only needs 24 MB. Might want to consider going older distro, so that it is smaller (although less features), but more efficient as the software would closer match the hardware (in terms of year of release).
Christian
With 1.2 GB, you will be hard pressed to install *everything*. Where you go will depend on what you want the computer to do. Since it is a laptop with limited space, I would suggest the following:
256 MB SWAP partition
/var 300 MB partition (this is where the logs are kept, and will prevent logs overwriting the main volume
/ partition with the rest.
Avoid --
* don't need FTP / WEB / NEWS / MAIL server software
* If you can squeeze the compilers in, do it.
* Choose one X manger -- GNOME or KDE. I prefer GNOME for simplicity... KDE is great if you want more bells and whistles on desktop
* Don't need to install source trees if you don't have compliers
* Choose one set of office programs -- either KOffice or Open Office, not both
You can also consider an older Linux distro, such as RedHat 7.3. With your laptop only having a 1.2 GB hard drive, you might also have RAM restrictions. I know RH 9 wants 64 MB RAM for starters, and the RH 7.3 only needs 24 MB. Might want to consider going older distro, so that it is smaller (although less features), but more efficient as the software would closer match the hardware (in terms of year of release).
Christian
slackware 10. just dont install everything and it should fit perfectly
all you have to do is not install all the server stuff like apache, mysql and a bunch of others
all you have to do is not install all the server stuff like apache, mysql and a bunch of others
Running GNOME and / or KDE on that laptop isn't going to be very fun. I'd suggest something more lightweight like XFCE if you have to have a window manager. Even then the X server itself is going to kill you on space. Anyway, if the harddrive space is such, I can only imagine how slow the processor, I/O bus, and memory are.
I dont recomend giving var its own paritition it tends to cause alot of probelms.
Firefox: no, its not the end all solution, it has its own issues and in time it will be just as insecure as IE, when its hit Firefox 6, if it makes it that far. Oh, and AOL pays for it, incase you didn't know.
Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,620
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 51
Hello,
Do you mean /var as it's own partition? That is what you want, actually! Your log files and other variable information will go into /var, and an out of control log can fill that volume before you get a chance to repair it. No computers like it when the root volume fills up on the hard drive. Errors galore. Give /var her own sizable partition if you can!
I have had Linux in the field for years, and have always had /var separated. Not a problem.
Also -- an .iso image is meant to be burnt onto a CD-ROM, and from there you will use that disk during the installation. I have heard of people installing from a hard drive to a hard drive, but I don't think that is what you are trying to do. Typically, the .iso image is going to be anywhere from 600M - 640M or so. That size should not be counted towards the installation size -- the pieces of the OS on that .iso image are compressed, and not configured for "realtime" use.
Christian
Do you mean /var as it's own partition? That is what you want, actually! Your log files and other variable information will go into /var, and an out of control log can fill that volume before you get a chance to repair it. No computers like it when the root volume fills up on the hard drive. Errors galore. Give /var her own sizable partition if you can!
I have had Linux in the field for years, and have always had /var separated. Not a problem.
Also -- an .iso image is meant to be burnt onto a CD-ROM, and from there you will use that disk during the installation. I have heard of people installing from a hard drive to a hard drive, but I don't think that is what you are trying to do. Typically, the .iso image is going to be anywhere from 600M - 640M or so. That size should not be counted towards the installation size -- the pieces of the OS on that .iso image are compressed, and not configured for "realtime" use.
Christian
![]() |
Similar Threads
- News Story: 1234567890 it is UNIX Time! (Linux Servers and Apache)
- C code program to Set/Change Linux time ??? (C)
- News Story: Crystal Ball Sunday #11: Linux Gets a Makeover (Window and Desktop Managers)
- News Story: Your Money is Linux-Powered (Linux Servers and Apache)
- News Story: RISC OS Look and Feel on Linux project ready to go live (Linux Servers and Apache)
- Suse Linux 9.1 Pro Freezes on Startup (*nix Software)
Other Threads in the Getting Started and Choosing a Distro Forum
- Previous Thread: Which dostro should I use for a P-75
- Next Thread: Dell Notebooks NOT Linux Friendly
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
age-related baremetal chrome cio cloudcomputing code commercial computers crystalballsunday developers development distributions distro dsl elderly embedded google http://expertcore.org/ innovations jauntyjackalope kernel library linus linux microsoft multi-core netgear newbies openoffice.org operating operatingsystems parallel performance processing redhat routers smp studios system systembuilders systemintegrators terminalservices thecloud thinclients tools ubuntu users virtualization vmware webbased wikis windows xenon






