| | |
Misleading signup information
![]() |
In the blurb to encourage guests to sign up, there's this line.
"In fact, there are 4,267 IT professionals currently interacting right now!"
Nope, not by a long shot.
I bet a lot of people think "Wow, must be a great place, I'm sure to get my question answered here in about 10 seconds for sure".
Later down the page, the truth is revealed.
"Currently Active Users: 4434 (57 members and 4377 guests)"
"Oh man, what a rip - only 57 actual people - wtf". Then they disappear never to be seen again.
"Guests" cannot be included, because they can't post. If they can't post, they can't interact.
Sure, some of them will sign up during the day, but the vast majority of them will either never post at all, or just post "Hi, I'm Fred Flintstone from Bedrock" in the introduce yourself forum.
Would you call the google web-crawler an IT professional - I wouldn't.
Of the 57 actual members in the list, how many are "professional" in the sense that they have an IT related job which pays them money? I see a lot of students employing a variety of reasons as to why they're too lazy to attempt their homework, but I sure wouldn't want to be working along side them.
The number of people currently logged on with >100 posts would be a far more realistic measure of the degree of expertese the site currently has available.
And not the number of open network connections, which seems to be what is being used at the moment.
"In fact, there are 4,267 IT professionals currently interacting right now!"
Nope, not by a long shot.
I bet a lot of people think "Wow, must be a great place, I'm sure to get my question answered here in about 10 seconds for sure".
Later down the page, the truth is revealed.
"Currently Active Users: 4434 (57 members and 4377 guests)"
"Oh man, what a rip - only 57 actual people - wtf". Then they disappear never to be seen again.
"Guests" cannot be included, because they can't post. If they can't post, they can't interact.
Sure, some of them will sign up during the day, but the vast majority of them will either never post at all, or just post "Hi, I'm Fred Flintstone from Bedrock" in the introduce yourself forum.
Would you call the google web-crawler an IT professional - I wouldn't.
Of the 57 actual members in the list, how many are "professional" in the sense that they have an IT related job which pays them money? I see a lot of students employing a variety of reasons as to why they're too lazy to attempt their homework, but I sure wouldn't want to be working along side them.
The number of people currently logged on with >100 posts would be a far more realistic measure of the degree of expertese the site currently has available.
And not the number of open network connections, which seems to be what is being used at the moment.
I think that you're taking this too seriously. And yes, there are that many people interacting with the website
•
•
•
•
there are 4,267 IT professionals currently interacting right now!
Davey Winder
Information Security Journalist of the Year
www.happygeek.com
Follow me on Twitter: @happygeek
Information Security Journalist of the Year
www.happygeek.com
Follow me on Twitter: @happygeek
Since there's also ~900 search bots in the count who are guests, maybe it's a little off. FWIW
[edit]Looks like standard VB behavior, though.
[edit]Looks like standard VB behavior, though.
Last edited by Dave Sinkula; Jun 26th, 2008 at 5:40 pm.
"One of the methods used by statists to destroy capitalism consists in establishing controls that tie a given industry hand and foot, making it unable to solve its problems, then declaring that freedom has failed and stronger controls are necessary." --Ayn Rand
Are they professional bots?
Davey Winder
Information Security Journalist of the Year
www.happygeek.com
Follow me on Twitter: @happygeek
Information Security Journalist of the Year
www.happygeek.com
Follow me on Twitter: @happygeek
![]() |
Other Threads in the DaniWeb Community Feedback Forum
- Previous Thread: Link directory
- Next Thread: help to fix this
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
+ abuse beginners bookmark bored box bug bugs calamity code codebox codesnippets codetags code_snippet comments cpuintensive daniweb design editcodesnippet end-of-the-world favouriteforums feedback ff3 flamewar glitch ie6 itsatag! kids layout login lulz negative newfeature poll post preview privatemessaging problem profanitytest profile quality quick rashakil-fol reply reputation reputation-power sandwich score search snippet socialgroups solvedthreads sub-forum suggestion tagcloud tagging tags theactualrulerofthetag-cloud:3 therulerofthetag-cloud:[ thread threadtagging today's-posts unansweredposts upgrade user voting whining







