Thread Solved

Join Date: Mar 2008
Posts: 95
Reputation: flynismo is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 1
flynismo flynismo is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: Intel vs AMD

 
0
  #11
Jul 24th, 2008
*double post
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 568
Reputation: OlyComputers will become famous soon enough OlyComputers will become famous soon enough 
Solved Threads: 34
OlyComputers OlyComputers is offline Offline
Posting Pro

Re: Intel vs AMD

 
0
  #12
Jul 24th, 2008
Intel chips are the best performing chips, especially for gaming, but you have to remember that you'd need to be buying one of the top 5 Intel chips to be at a level you couldn't match with AMD.

According to YouGamers (linked from 3dmakrs homepage) the top ten best value chips, measured by estimated 3dmarks per dollar, are all AMD chips with most of the list following suite.

http://www.yougamers.com/hardware/st...ndperformance/

Intel has better top-end chips, but in the mid range there's not much difference between a $125 Athlon X2 and a $150 core2 duo. If you want to build a really serious gaming rig without much concern for price you'd probably want Intel, but if you're looking at a mid-range system with a $75-200 cpu, you can get the same performance out of either brand if you pick the right chip.

We've been arguing the AMD vs. Intel debate for nearly two decades. No one post on any forum is going to provide a definitive answer. Every couple of years one comes out on top of the other in performance, let's look back a little shal we?
AMD developed widespread 64-bit technology first, but Intel beat them to dual core.
AMD's first dual cores performed better than Intels, and Intels quads perform better than AMDs now.
AMD's opterons performed better than Intels Xeons for a long time.
Intels Core2 series butchered AMDs Turions in laptops, and then even grew to out-perform the Athlon in the desktop market.
It looks like AMD is going to beat intel to the market with integrated CPU/GPU pairs.

They're always going to go back and forth for dominance in perforamance, but when it comes down to it, I don't think AMD will ever surpass Intel in market share, unless Intel goes completely out of business. Anybody who's really qualified to recommend hardware should be able to consider cost, performance, compatibility, upgradeability, warranty, brand, and all the other factors in picking a CPU for an individuals needs.
-This post is provided without warranty, emotion, or a conscience. Hope it helps-
*I'm an egomaniac: I love reputation points*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2008
Posts: 4
Reputation: Veinscape is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 1
Veinscape's Avatar
Veinscape Veinscape is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: Intel vs AMD

 
0
  #13
Jul 25th, 2008
Ohhh man...

Well this thread has been smashed to pieces with one big swing...

I can't wait to see what AMD/ATI come out with in the future!

But for now, I think i'm going to stick with intel...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread has been marked solved.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Motherboards, CPUs and RAM Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC