Creating Excel DLLs
Please support our Mac Software advertiser: Programming Forums
![]() |
Hello,
Are you sure that you want to make a DLL, as in the traditional Windoze DLL (Dynamic Linked Library?) I do not believe Mac Excel will support that... then again they may have added new features to Office 2004 that will do that sort of thing.
Are you sure you aren't thinking of Macros? Windoze-developed Macros should work just fine in the equivelant Office program... because they are within the Office program, and can work.
A DLL, to my understanding, is an OS thing, and yes, the Mac uses linked libraries, but I am certain they are structurally different than the Windoze codebase.
Christian
Are you sure that you want to make a DLL, as in the traditional Windoze DLL (Dynamic Linked Library?) I do not believe Mac Excel will support that... then again they may have added new features to Office 2004 that will do that sort of thing.
Are you sure you aren't thinking of Macros? Windoze-developed Macros should work just fine in the equivelant Office program... because they are within the Office program, and can work.
A DLL, to my understanding, is an OS thing, and yes, the Mac uses linked libraries, but I am certain they are structurally different than the Windoze codebase.
Christian
•
•
Posts: 2
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I thought the benefit of DLLs were that they were developed in C and were therefore a lot faster than the use of ordinary Excel macros?
I was also under the impression that in Windows you could either use the ordinary macros or DLLs. If you had something that was processor intensive and you wanted speed, then you would use DLLs. Is there an equivalent for Mac or am a wrong about the purpose of DLLs?
Cheers
Neil
I was also under the impression that in Windows you could either use the ordinary macros or DLLs. If you had something that was processor intensive and you wanted speed, then you would use DLLs. Is there an equivalent for Mac or am a wrong about the purpose of DLLs?
Cheers
Neil
Hi,
This topic is beyond me, so I don't want to mislead you. There very well could be a development tool.
DLLs in Windows are written and compiled, whereas Macros are "interpreted" like a script. You would see more speed on a DLL given a proper configuration and programming logic.
I wish I could help you more on this.
I wonder what MS Technet has to say about it. Perhaps you would also do a Google search and dig deeper. If you do find something, please let us know.
Christian
This topic is beyond me, so I don't want to mislead you. There very well could be a development tool.
DLLs in Windows are written and compiled, whereas Macros are "interpreted" like a script. You would see more speed on a DLL given a proper configuration and programming logic.
I wish I could help you more on this.
I wonder what MS Technet has to say about it. Perhaps you would also do a Google search and dig deeper. If you do find something, please let us know.
Christian
Yes and no. One could write a dll in C, C++, C#, J#, or even VB.NET or VB6. They're basically a pre-compiled object or library that when referenced is used with other APIs. The problem with macros is that they are compiled at run-time. So in essence whenever you use a macro for the first time, it needs to be compiled, making it less efficient.
Another advantage of dlls is the ability to share a tool with someone else without revealing the code behind it. I'm completely for open source systems, but for corporate IP issues, this is an advantage.
I hope this helps a bit
Andy
Another advantage of dlls is the ability to share a tool with someone else without revealing the code behind it. I'm completely for open source systems, but for corporate IP issues, this is an advantage.
I hope this helps a bit
Andy
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by gus
I thought the benefit of DLLs were that they were developed in C and were therefore a lot faster than the use of ordinary Excel macros?
I was also under the impression that in Windows you could either use the ordinary macros or DLLs. If you had something that was processor intensive and you wanted speed, then you would use DLLs. Is there an equivalent for Mac or am a wrong about the purpose of DLLs?
Cheers
Neil
![]() |
Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Mac Software Forum
- Hidden program installs .dlls with randomly generated names in random "notify" reg. (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
- Creating a VB dll (Visual Basic 4 / 5 / 6)
- Qestion on Encoding and Decoding. (Python)
- record results in excel file from vb (VB.NET)
- Using Microsoft Excel 10.0 Libary Object -Dang .dlls (C#)
Other Threads in the Mac Software Forum
- Previous Thread: I Cant Install Software Programs
- Next Thread: Network Program Help
•
•
•
•
Views: 4949 | Replies: 4 | Currently Viewing: 1 (0 members and 1 guests)






Linear Mode