| | |
can't get CPU to do 100% load in XP
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 1
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
abit ic7 (bios ver. 16)
pentium 4C 2.4 @ 2.8 (HT enabled)
2x 512 ocz ddr400 cas2 (2-3-3-6)
radeon 9700np 333/315
windows xp sp1
hi guys, this has been bothering me forever. my cpu scores in 3dmarks '03/aquamark 3 are all on par with the norm. they are 650/9463 respectively. real world gaming performance verify this. however, when i'm executing non-gaming apps in XP, my CPU rarely operates above 90% one thing that stands out the most is video rendering/encoding. (although i don't know the cpu usage during gameplay, performance is on par with published benchmarks, so i assume it's operating at maximum)
right now, i'm encoding video through Virtual Dub. when i look under cpu usage, it's only operating at 50%. isn't there something wrong? why is it not utilizing 100% of my cpu when encoding video? the following picture might better explain things. at the time of screenshot one processor is maxed out and the other sitting pretty at 0% (one logical cpu, XP sees 2 due to hyperthreading). just a few minutes prior both were operating at 50%...but the total usage still reamined 50%. i've even tried to set it's priority to realtime/high in the processes tab but it does nothing. and processor affinity shows both cpus under use by Vdub.
http://home.cogeco.ca/~konig/usage.JPG
the only times i see >85% cpu usage is when multiple applications are working away. is this the nature of HT? does it only allow one application thread a certain amount of cycles? i get simialar results when rendering video with premiere 6. i dunno, something must be wrong. my old 2.4b @ 2.8 (non HT) was always 99-100% loaded when rendering video.
(i can't recall video redering performance/speed of the 2.4b @ 2.8. so i can't really compare redering times between the "b" and "c" versions to find out if the "c" is infact faster at 50% load than the "b" at 100% load...although synthetic gaming benchmarks ala 3dmarks show higher scores for the C at same speeds)
I've installed the neccessary intel chipset stuff from the install cd that came with the mobo. i have the latest (well, almost latest) bios rev. is there something i might be missing in a bios setting? please help me before i waste mad monies calling intel support long distance. thanks guys.
pentium 4C 2.4 @ 2.8 (HT enabled)
2x 512 ocz ddr400 cas2 (2-3-3-6)
radeon 9700np 333/315
windows xp sp1
hi guys, this has been bothering me forever. my cpu scores in 3dmarks '03/aquamark 3 are all on par with the norm. they are 650/9463 respectively. real world gaming performance verify this. however, when i'm executing non-gaming apps in XP, my CPU rarely operates above 90% one thing that stands out the most is video rendering/encoding. (although i don't know the cpu usage during gameplay, performance is on par with published benchmarks, so i assume it's operating at maximum)
right now, i'm encoding video through Virtual Dub. when i look under cpu usage, it's only operating at 50%. isn't there something wrong? why is it not utilizing 100% of my cpu when encoding video? the following picture might better explain things. at the time of screenshot one processor is maxed out and the other sitting pretty at 0% (one logical cpu, XP sees 2 due to hyperthreading). just a few minutes prior both were operating at 50%...but the total usage still reamined 50%. i've even tried to set it's priority to realtime/high in the processes tab but it does nothing. and processor affinity shows both cpus under use by Vdub.
http://home.cogeco.ca/~konig/usage.JPG
the only times i see >85% cpu usage is when multiple applications are working away. is this the nature of HT? does it only allow one application thread a certain amount of cycles? i get simialar results when rendering video with premiere 6. i dunno, something must be wrong. my old 2.4b @ 2.8 (non HT) was always 99-100% loaded when rendering video.
(i can't recall video redering performance/speed of the 2.4b @ 2.8. so i can't really compare redering times between the "b" and "c" versions to find out if the "c" is infact faster at 50% load than the "b" at 100% load...although synthetic gaming benchmarks ala 3dmarks show higher scores for the C at same speeds)
I've installed the neccessary intel chipset stuff from the install cd that came with the mobo. i have the latest (well, almost latest) bios rev. is there something i might be missing in a bios setting? please help me before i waste mad monies calling intel support long distance. thanks guys.
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by vassili_zaitsev
is this the nature of HT? does it only allow one application thread a certain amount of cycles?
The reason why you see 50% usage with vdub is that vdub isn't multi-threaded, therefore it only uses one of the "two" available processors.
It's not hurting performance either way. You just have a "second" processor to handle the other tasks while vdub is hammering away at your Divx encodes.
Champagne ambition on a beer budget.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- problem with my computer (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- Component cooling question? (Cases, Fans and Power Supplies)
- problem with xp pro s2 maybe? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Outlook Express 6 is frozen, and uses 100% CPU (Windows Software)
- CPU at 100% after installing broadband!?! (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Cpu at 100% (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
Other Threads in the Windows NT / 2000 / XP Forum
- Previous Thread: COMPUTER FREEZE! help!
- Next Thread: ASP locating file at client side
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
.net 3.5 3daccelertion 64bit 2007 2010 a.exe activedirectory address alaris android application appstore black blue bsod bulletin canonical chinese codeplex combofix cursor deployment deployments desktop dns domain drive eartlink error explorer fax fontmanagers fonts format framework freeze gadgets hardware home interoperability laptop laptops latitude lcd linux login mac markshuttleworth memory microsoft mobile monitor motionle1600 netbooks opensource operatingsystems options oracle osinstallationproblem osx outlook palm printer program proxy raid rds reformat remotedesktop replacingraiddrive retail retrieve screen security server. sharepoint simplifiedchinese sitetositevpn slowperformance sp3 studios technology ubuntu update upgrade videodrivers virtual virus vista visual vpn win win32/heur windows windows7 windowsxp windowsxpnotstartingup. xp xpde





