| | |
Help me choose my build please
![]() |
Buy the 3500+. The 4000+ is far too expensive for the extra performance you would get.
If you want stability, I would consider the Asus A8V Deluxe. For overclocking, I would go for the Abit AV8.
For rendering, the best route would be professional 3D graphics cards, which cost a fortune if you choose top of the range. Otherwise, I would just pick out a 6800GT. The only difference between it and the ultra is reduced clockspeeds. Plus you will easily get 1.5 years out of it.
If you want stability, I would consider the Asus A8V Deluxe. For overclocking, I would go for the Abit AV8.
For rendering, the best route would be professional 3D graphics cards, which cost a fortune if you choose top of the range. Otherwise, I would just pick out a 6800GT. The only difference between it and the ultra is reduced clockspeeds. Plus you will easily get 1.5 years out of it.
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 82
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Coconut Monkey
Buy the 3500+. The 4000+ is far too expensive for the extra performance you would get.
If you want stability, I would consider the Asus A8V Deluxe. For overclocking, I would go for the Abit AV8.
For rendering, the best route would be professional 3D graphics cards, which cost a fortune if you choose top of the range. Otherwise, I would just pick out a 6800GT. The only difference between it and the ultra is reduced clockspeeds. Plus you will easily get 1.5 years out of it.
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 82
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Looking at this, it seems that higher quality RAM gives you some big performance increases. Any arguments with this? Did I read something wrong?
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by oenone
Looking at this, it seems that higher quality RAM gives you some big performance increases. Any arguments with this? Did I read something wrong?
is this a dream
We should all respect Dani, shes the admin and she does a damn good job!. Not to forget the rest of the mod's =)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v5...46/Sphyenx.jpg
We should all respect Dani, shes the admin and she does a damn good job!. Not to forget the rest of the mod's =)
http://img.photobucket.com/albums/v5...46/Sphyenx.jpg
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 82
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Sphyenx
Its always been a fact that more RAM means more power, also the qaulity counts. I mean you cant buy shitty RAM for 5 bucks and expect it to run like Kingston.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 144
You're correct oeone. There is a performance difference but it's not dramatic at all. Most of the 'Value' lines of reputable manufacturers operate at CAS3, while the 'performance' lines operate at CAS2. That makes for a noticeable difference, but by no means a dramatic one. It is, after all, only one small factor in overall system performance.
Besides, if you purchase RAM modules which are rated a speed level ABOVE what you wish to run, you'll most likely be able to operate it at tighter timings anyway, when you clock it back a bit
Besides, if you purchase RAM modules which are rated a speed level ABOVE what you wish to run, you'll most likely be able to operate it at tighter timings anyway, when you clock it back a bit
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 32
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 1
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Catweazle
You're correct oeone. There is a performance difference but it's not dramatic at all. Most of the 'Value' lines of reputable manufacturers operate at CAS3, while the 'performance' lines operate at CAS2. That makes for a noticeable difference, but by no means a dramatic one. It is, after all, only one small factor in overall system performance.
Besides, if you purchase RAM modules which are rated a speed level ABOVE what you wish to run, you'll most likely be able to operate it at tighter timings anyway, when you clock it back a bit
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 144
Some links to the tests you refer to would be helpful, rogue-monkey. I'm sure you are misinterpreting what you've seen reported.
Changing to a better display card brings the most benefit for games. Changing to a better cpu can help, but isn't really worth doing unless you are looking at a processor performance improvement of around 50% or better.
Using lower latency RAM would bring the least game performance improvement of the three.
Changing to a better display card brings the most benefit for games. Changing to a better cpu can help, but isn't really worth doing unless you are looking at a processor performance improvement of around 50% or better.
Using lower latency RAM would bring the least game performance improvement of the three.
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 82
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Yar... I didn't quite have my wits about me I suppose. After looking around a bit more it seems that your quite right, RAM has a very limited affect. If I had memory at CAS 2.5 timings, and I made them a little more aggresive, to CAS 2.0, what issues with stability/speed might I have to look out for? Thanks.
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 144
If you sett your RAM timings tighter than your RAM modules will handle, you'll experience freezes, lockups and so on. It's best to stick to manufacturer recommended timings unless you are fully aware of what you are doing and what the effects will be. There are tools you can use, such as memtest86, which allow you to test your RAM for stability.
![]() |
Other Threads in the Motherboards, CPUs and RAM Forum
- Previous Thread: New Motherboard Needed
- Next Thread: Motherboard identification
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |






