| | |
Mac cpu?
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 82
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by rcrevolution
what cpu does the Mac G5 use? is it better then the amd fx-55?
i dont know anything about macs
Which CPU wins out has everything to do with test conditions.
Apple couldn't get a dual CPU G5 to outperform a single CPU P4 machine even when they used an optimising compiler for the G5 and an non-optimising compiler for the P4 AND turned off hyperthreading on the P4 while finetuning the G5 for maximum performance...
Had they just used Photoshop and told it to perform some expensive manipulation it would likely have been faster but that wouldn't serve Apple's purpose of breaking out of the mold of being specialised graphics workstations
Apple couldn't get a dual CPU G5 to outperform a single CPU P4 machine even when they used an optimising compiler for the G5 and an non-optimising compiler for the P4 AND turned off hyperthreading on the P4 while finetuning the G5 for maximum performance...
Had they just used Photoshop and told it to perform some expensive manipulation it would likely have been faster but that wouldn't serve Apple's purpose of breaking out of the mold of being specialised graphics workstations
Some How i doubt that is true, as I remember reading stats and tons of test data, they are real work horses
It depends on what you really want to do, if its game and do regular windows like things, go with AMD64 and Windows XP
If you want to do alot more video, music, and graphics editing I would at least consider a dual g5 system.
But it comes down to personal prefrence.
It depends on what you really want to do, if its game and do regular windows like things, go with AMD64 and Windows XP
If you want to do alot more video, music, and graphics editing I would at least consider a dual g5 system.
But it comes down to personal prefrence.
Firefox: no, its not the end all solution, it has its own issues and in time it will be just as insecure as IE, when its hit Firefox 6, if it makes it that far. Oh, and AOL pays for it, incase you didn't know.
Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 82
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Yeah, in compiling dual G5's would easily blow away a P4. No other system can handle 8 gigs of RAM. Anyone who does a lot of video/picture/music work/editing will use a mac. For example, on photoshop a single G5 outperforms a P4 3.4 ghz by 82% when they both have 2 gigs of ram. As the RAM increases, the 64 bit CPU will pull farther ahead. On the other hand, if your a serious gamer, an AMD chip is the way to go. It is faster than P4 (Max speed AND 'bang for your buck'). It all comes down to what you wll be using the system for. Many people complain that macs are overpriced, but I simply think you get what you pay for. Everything about the system is higher quality than your average Dell, from the cooling to the aesthetics to the raw power they offer.
PS: Dual 2.5ghz G5's would probably have over 3 times the performance when compiling than a P4 3.4ghz with hyper threading turned off.
PS: Dual 2.5ghz G5's would probably have over 3 times the performance when compiling than a P4 3.4ghz with hyper threading turned off.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Mac Cpu Accelerators (Apple Hardware)
- Trouble w/OSX 10.3 & Safari, + more. (OS X)
Other Threads in the Motherboards, CPUs and RAM Forum
- Previous Thread: Fried motherboard by carelessness...
- Next Thread: New Motherboard Needed
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |






