Hiding IP addy for WAN traffic?

Reply

Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 82
Reputation: himerus is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
himerus's Avatar
himerus himerus is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Hiding IP addy for WAN traffic?

 
0
  #1
Nov 1st, 2003
I have a new Linksys Wireless-G WAP. I'm trying to figure out how to set it up so that rather than all surfing traffic on the network showing up as the Static IP that is assigned to the WAP, I'd like it to just appear blocked.

Any thoughts?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 16
Reputation: |The|Snowman is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
|The|Snowman |The|Snowman is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: Hiding IP addy for WAN traffic?

 
0
  #2
Nov 4th, 2003
Originally Posted by himerus
I have a new Linksys Wireless-G WAP. I'm trying to figure out how to set it up so that rather than all surfing traffic on the network showing up as the Static IP that is assigned to the WAP, I'd like it to just appear blocked.

Any thoughts?
Ok, your title states: "Hiding IP addy for WAN traffic?"

To my knowledge, your not going to be able to do this, the best you can do is encrpyt the data no?

Whether or not your ip is static or dynamic, there isn't going to be a way to hide the ip itself. That is unless your using a proxy, but that would be for surfing only.

As long as you have a firewall it should show up as "blocked". Or if your router doesn't accept pings and drops them on inpact the rest of the world should assume your ip is as an unplugged computer or non-existent/unassigned.

Right?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 766
Reputation: )BIG"B"Affleck can only hope to improve 
Solved Threads: 6
)BIG"B"Affleck's Avatar
)BIG"B"Affleck )BIG"B"Affleck is offline Offline
Banned

Re: Hiding IP addy for WAN traffic?

 
0
  #3
Nov 4th, 2003
Attached Thumbnails
topology3.jpg  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 311
Reputation: feigned is a jewel in the rough feigned is a jewel in the rough feigned is a jewel in the rough 
Solved Threads: 4
feigned's Avatar
feigned feigned is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Re: Hiding IP addy for WAN traffic?

 
0
  #4
Nov 4th, 2003
Originally Posted by |The|Snowman
Ok, your title states: "Hiding IP addy for WAN traffic?"

To my knowledge, your not going to be able to do this, the best you can do is encrpyt the data no?

Whether or not your ip is static or dynamic, there isn't going to be a way to hide the ip itself. That is unless your using a proxy, but that would be for surfing only.

As long as you have a firewall it should show up as "blocked". Or if your router doesn't accept pings and drops them on inpact the rest of the world should assume your ip is as an unplugged computer or non-existent/unassigned.

Right?
Yeah. Just have it drop all ICMP requests, and it'll never be pingable.
Champagne ambition on a beer budget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 16
Reputation: |The|Snowman is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
|The|Snowman |The|Snowman is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: Hiding IP addy for WAN traffic?

 
0
  #5
Nov 4th, 2003
Yeah. Just have it drop all ICMP requests, and it'll never be pingable.
That's how I have my router, and my firewall. Just incase those crafty hackers come up with something to fool the SPI at the router.

[off topic]
I'm telling ya, Sygate is highly underestimated, except in the hacker scene. Everyone spouts off about how good zone alarm is, but they fail to mention there have been exploits for ZA in the past, and there will more than likely be more to come in the future. To my knowledge, Sygate has no known exploits to date.[/off topic]
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 311
Reputation: feigned is a jewel in the rough feigned is a jewel in the rough feigned is a jewel in the rough 
Solved Threads: 4
feigned's Avatar
feigned feigned is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Re: Hiding IP addy for WAN traffic?

 
0
  #6
Nov 4th, 2003
Originally Posted by )BIG"B"Affleck
(SUGGESTION)
http://www.zyxel.com/support/support.../app/zw_sw.htm
What does a VPN tunnel have to do with this?
Champagne ambition on a beer budget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 16
Reputation: |The|Snowman is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
|The|Snowman |The|Snowman is offline Offline
Newbie Poster

Re: Hiding IP addy for WAN traffic?

 
0
  #7
Nov 4th, 2003
Edit:

Actually, VPN's can be established over the public internet.
Last edited by |The|Snowman; Nov 4th, 2003 at 4:36 pm.
Attached Thumbnails
web1.gif   web2.gif  
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 766
Reputation: )BIG"B"Affleck can only hope to improve 
Solved Threads: 6
)BIG"B"Affleck's Avatar
)BIG"B"Affleck )BIG"B"Affleck is offline Offline
Banned

Re: Hiding IP addy for WAN traffic?

 
0
  #8
Nov 4th, 2003
You couldnt of said it better SNOW :lol:
Last edited by )BIG"B"Affleck; Nov 4th, 2003 at 4:41 pm.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 82
Reputation: himerus is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
himerus's Avatar
himerus himerus is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: Hiding IP addy for WAN traffic?

 
0
  #9
Nov 15th, 2003
Sorry if my original post wasn't made clear...

on my site/sites, I have a logging function that I've created that pulls the IP of the users on the site. (REMOTE_ADDR). I use it for some simple info on reverse DNS, for the purpose of seeing what type of internet connections users are browsing my site on, since the purpose is to locate a new ISP at the site.

Long story short, I've seen tons of blocked IPs in the system some show up as 0.0.0.0, others as a bunch of + signs.

I'll look at the suggestions here.... an I do appreciate them... but I've just now set up a Direcway DW6000 system, so the Linksys is just inside of that, and I'm still new to the config on the DW6000. (YES, that was my only real option for high-speed. )

So with the new equip that appears to be very unconfigurable to the end user... <searches for a hammer> I'll have to do some experimentation.

Thanks!!!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Other Threads in the Networking Hardware Configuration Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC