| | |
validation
Please support our JavaScript / DHTML / AJAX advertiser: PostgreSQL or MySQL? Compare and contrast the two most popular open source databases
![]() |
Have I got this right?
I have a massive form with about 150 text fields with about 10 min of which need to be filled in. If I add a .js file and my .css file to the server that checks the form fields as the user fills it in with correct validation this will overcome the client side of on/off javascript. The form will be using the .js file on the server to check the fields regardless of the client.
Take me about 3 days to make and code all this but i'm sure i'll get there.
I then have a .php file which will extract all the data and email it back to me. Thus the .php file will not need if & else statements as the .js will do it all in the process of filling it in.
Also I will set-up a protected folder which will store the .php, .css and .js files which will keep the files away from anybody trying to harrass me with injection.
Does this sound like the right way to do all this?
simple answers of yes or no and why will do me.
This is what I will call stage 1 of 2 but stage 2 will be next week at least
I have a massive form with about 150 text fields with about 10 min of which need to be filled in. If I add a .js file and my .css file to the server that checks the form fields as the user fills it in with correct validation this will overcome the client side of on/off javascript. The form will be using the .js file on the server to check the fields regardless of the client.
Take me about 3 days to make and code all this but i'm sure i'll get there.
I then have a .php file which will extract all the data and email it back to me. Thus the .php file will not need if & else statements as the .js will do it all in the process of filling it in.
Also I will set-up a protected folder which will store the .php, .css and .js files which will keep the files away from anybody trying to harrass me with injection.
Does this sound like the right way to do all this?
simple answers of yes or no and why will do me.
This is what I will call stage 1 of 2 but stage 2 will be next week at least
No absolutely not. You have such a huge form with so many text fields. From the user perspective imagine whether it is good to wait for the slow server to response for validation just for not filling a field.
That will be very frustrating!!
That will be very frustrating!!
Last edited by Luckychap; Dec 2nd, 2008 at 12:53 am.
When you think you have done a lot, then be ready for YOUR downfall.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- W3C Validation (HTML and CSS)
- .net validation/javascript conflict (ASP.NET)
Other Threads in the JavaScript / DHTML / AJAX Forum
- Previous Thread: Merging 2 Arrays
- Next Thread: gridview search when keypress
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
acid2 ajax ajaxcode ajaxexample ajaxhelp ajaxjspservlets animate automatically beta box browser bug captchaformproblem checkbox close codes createrange() css cursor debugger decimal dependent disablefirebug dom download dropdown editor element engine enter error events explorer ext file firefox form forms frameworks getselection google gwt gxt hiddenvalue highlightedword hint html htmlform ie7 ie8 iframe index internet java javascript javascripthelp2020 jawascriptruntimeerror jquery jsf jsp jump listbox maps masterpage math media menu microsoft mp4 object onmouseoutdivproblem onreadystatechange paypal pdf php player position problem programming progressbar prototype redirect regex runtime safari scale scriptlets search security select software sql text textarea unicode w3c window windowofwords windowsxp \n





