| | |
mp3 compression
![]() |
what is the best mp3 compressor which produces the smallest files while still maintaining good quality.
google it, that is always my first resource www.google.com Daniweb is my second resource, sorry Dani
My karma ran over your dogma.
I like to use Acoustica's PRO Audio Converter whenever batching my CD's WAVs into high-bitrate MP3.
For the reference, don't take something compressed... and then compress it again. It gets ugly. Make a WAV out of the original first, and mess with that. A little advice for ye.
The MP3 is somewhat limited, and most encoding engines are fairly similar. Anything under a 192kbps/44.1kHz/MPEG-1 is sure to have audible traces of compression, through much experimentation.
For the reference, don't take something compressed... and then compress it again. It gets ugly. Make a WAV out of the original first, and mess with that. A little advice for ye.
The MP3 is somewhat limited, and most encoding engines are fairly similar. Anything under a 192kbps/44.1kHz/MPEG-1 is sure to have audible traces of compression, through much experimentation.
Personal messages and emails will not be ignored.
What exactly is your intention? Obviously the original post was a question, not a statement. So why are you expecting someone to give it to you, then?
Just for the record, MP3 files are actually quite bad quality - the bitrate has to be fairly high to achieve a good quality. Consider using a better compression algorithm: if you're using iTunes choose AAC ; on Windows Media Player use WMA, and Ogg/Vorbis for all you Linux geeks out there. Any of these formats sound better than MP3 when compressed at the same bitrates.
The reason that MP3 is so popular is because it's a standard format; thus the name "MP3 player". The technology was fairly groundbreaking at the time, allowing a very small file for the amount of quality you get, but nowadays it's not that great.
Just for the record, MP3 files are actually quite bad quality - the bitrate has to be fairly high to achieve a good quality. Consider using a better compression algorithm: if you're using iTunes choose AAC ; on Windows Media Player use WMA, and Ogg/Vorbis for all you Linux geeks out there. Any of these formats sound better than MP3 when compressed at the same bitrates.
The reason that MP3 is so popular is because it's a standard format; thus the name "MP3 player". The technology was fairly groundbreaking at the time, allowing a very small file for the amount of quality you get, but nowadays it's not that great.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
•
•
•
•
Well the HIGHER THE BITRATE (Bigger file) the better sounding MP3..
For example, AAC at 128 KB/s is roughly equivalent to a 160 or 192 KB/s compressed MP3 file. WMA and Ogg/Vorbis are also quite similar.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
![]() |
Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum
- Previous Thread: Do you put ketchup on your eggs?
- Next Thread: 51
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
amazon apple article bankruptcy beard beijing children clocks code cognitive_disorder comedy complaint console consoles cracked.com daniweb design development disk dlc ebook empty facebook feed financialcrisis fun future game games gaming garbage google grandtheftauto gta gtaiv happiness hardware hunting internet java kids kindle knife larnyx library life linux mad manly marketing merger microsoft murder neuropathology news nintendo obama odf olympics opinion os outlook pain parentalcontrol playstation population ps3 ps4 python research rss search software softwaredevelopment sony source space subversion survey tablet thelostanddamned time timeisonmyside. unused usarmy vapid videogames viruses wave wii windows windows>all windows_wins world worldofwarcraft wow www xbox xbox360 zomg_conspiracy






