| | |
Setting up 2 Monitors w/ PowerMac G4
Thread Solved |
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Hello,
I just received my new Cinema Display 20" and have it all hooked up.
However, I would like to also run the previous monitor which is a NEC Accusync LCD 17" as a second monitor. I'm told this would be particularly beneficial when using photoshop.
There is only one port on the back of the PowerMac which fits the monitor.
There is another port which has 3 rows of 10 pins which is not being used.
Is there a way I can run both monitors simutaneously?
Thank you in advance.
Amy
I just received my new Cinema Display 20" and have it all hooked up.
However, I would like to also run the previous monitor which is a NEC Accusync LCD 17" as a second monitor. I'm told this would be particularly beneficial when using photoshop.
There is only one port on the back of the PowerMac which fits the monitor.
There is another port which has 3 rows of 10 pins which is not being used.
Is there a way I can run both monitors simutaneously?
Thank you in advance.
Amy
Yeah, although you'll need to add another video card. Get a PCI video card (note that it's just PCI -- PCI Express, or PCI-E for short is a completely different interface), and make sure it has the correct output. If your monitor has a plug that looks like this:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._Connector.jpg
Then it supports DVI and you should look for a PCI video card which supports DVI output.
If the only monitor input you have looks like this:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...-SVGA_port.jpg
Your monitor only supports VGA, and you should look for a video card which supports VGA output. Note that it might also be advertised as SVGA, which is essentially the same thing.
If your monitor supports both, go with DVI as it's a purely digital signal and will therefore result in a higher picture quality.
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi..._Connector.jpg
Then it supports DVI and you should look for a PCI video card which supports DVI output.
If the only monitor input you have looks like this:
http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...-SVGA_port.jpg
Your monitor only supports VGA, and you should look for a video card which supports VGA output. Note that it might also be advertised as SVGA, which is essentially the same thing.
If your monitor supports both, go with DVI as it's a purely digital signal and will therefore result in a higher picture quality.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Thank you for the great information, John. The pics were very helpful too.
The PowerMac has the DVI connection and while the NEC has a VGA, it came with the DVI adapter, so I am all set for DVI.
I'm going to try to identify what the other connector is on the back of the PowerMac. Now it has made me curious.
Thanks again.
Amy
The PowerMac has the DVI connection and while the NEC has a VGA, it came with the DVI adapter, so I am all set for DVI.
I'm going to try to identify what the other connector is on the back of the PowerMac. Now it has made me curious.
Thanks again.
Amy
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Ok, the other connection is an ADC port. It's intention was to enable the use of 2 monitors, but was abandoned after the Power Mac series. http://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedi...yConnector.jpg
BUT there is a DVI to ADC Adapter still available.
My new question is since the monitor is VGA, but with adapter becomes DVI, is it "safe" to use 2 adapters back-to-back?
In other words, it would be Monitor (VGA) connected to DVI Adapter, which would be connected to the ADC Adapter, and then to the ADC connector in the back of computer.
Would an additional PCI graphics card still be preferable to the Adapter?
BUT there is a DVI to ADC Adapter still available.
My new question is since the monitor is VGA, but with adapter becomes DVI, is it "safe" to use 2 adapters back-to-back?
In other words, it would be Monitor (VGA) connected to DVI Adapter, which would be connected to the ADC Adapter, and then to the ADC connector in the back of computer.
Would an additional PCI graphics card still be preferable to the Adapter?
>is it "safe" to use 2 adapters back-to-back?
I doubt it. It gets a little tricky because VGA is analog, while DVI is digital, and converting the signals back and forth a couple of times likely won't work (see this).
A simpler solution would be to connect the NEC Accusync LCD 17" to your PowerMac's DVI port with your DVI to VGA adapter. Then, buy the ADC to DVI adapter and use that to connect your Cinema display to your ADC port.
I doubt it. It gets a little tricky because VGA is analog, while DVI is digital, and converting the signals back and forth a couple of times likely won't work (see this).
A simpler solution would be to connect the NEC Accusync LCD 17" to your PowerMac's DVI port with your DVI to VGA adapter. Then, buy the ADC to DVI adapter and use that to connect your Cinema display to your ADC port.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
>Unfortunately, the second and most viable option costs a lot more.
I fail to understand what you mean. An ADC to DVI adapter costs $30 on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Belkin-F2E9142.../dp/B000067RLH
Through that adapter, you can connect your Cinema display to your ADC port on your computer.
You said you already have a DVI to VGA adapter, so you can connect your NEC Accusync LCD 17" to the DVI port on your PowerMac.
Or have I missed something?
I fail to understand what you mean. An ADC to DVI adapter costs $30 on Amazon:
http://www.amazon.com/Belkin-F2E9142.../dp/B000067RLH
Through that adapter, you can connect your Cinema display to your ADC port on your computer.
You said you already have a DVI to VGA adapter, so you can connect your NEC Accusync LCD 17" to the DVI port on your PowerMac.
Or have I missed something?
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2006
Posts: 24
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I was thinking of the other way around. The ADC monitor to DVI port were around $100.
Yes, the DVI monitor to the ADC port are much more reasonable. Thanks for pointing it out.
By going from DVI (monitor) to ADC port, is it likely to sacrifice any picture quality?
Yes, the DVI monitor to the ADC port are much more reasonable. Thanks for pointing it out.
By going from DVI (monitor) to ADC port, is it likely to sacrifice any picture quality?
Last edited by Amy M.; Dec 21st, 2008 at 11:47 pm.
>By going from DVI (monitor) to ADC port, is it likely to sacrifice any picture quality?
Nope, because the image signals that run through the ADC are digital (as compared to the purely analog VGA). ADC essentially is DVI with a few add-ons thrown in.
Nope, because the image signals that run through the ADC are digital (as compared to the purely analog VGA). ADC essentially is DVI with a few add-ons thrown in.
"Technological progress is like an axe in the hands of a pathological criminal."
![]() |
Other Threads in the Apple Hardware Forum
- Previous Thread: Apple grows up?
- Next Thread: Problem updating iPod touch software
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
02 3g 3gs adobe advertising android app apple appstore at&t bailout battery bestbuy blackberry bug cell cellphone cellphones cisco clone cloudcomputing dell development downloads earnings economy freedom funny g1 gadgets gaming google gps hardware health ibm imac iphone iphone3g ipod ipodtouch itouch itunes jobs kindle legal leopard linux mac macbook macbookpro macintosh macosx macworld microsoft military mobile mobileme mobilephone mobilephones mp3 music nano news nokia o2 os osx palm patent phone pre review rim rimm satnav search security smartphone smartphones software sony stevejobs stock sun survey t-mobile tablet technologystocks tomtom touchscreen twitter uk update upgrade verizon virus windows yahoo zune






