Reply

Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 311
Reputation: feigned is a jewel in the rough feigned is a jewel in the rough feigned is a jewel in the rough 
Solved Threads: 4
feigned's Avatar
feigned feigned is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Re: Cable Problems

 
0
  #11
Nov 11th, 2003
Originally Posted by caperjack
I've used that one before ,when i run it before i download and run the optimizer it shows around 1.7mb ,after 3.3 mbps
I'm having a really difficult time believing a 200% increase in speed because of some registry tweaks.

Mine runs at 3Mbs right after a clean installation. If you get 1.7Mbs after a fresh install, that's not XP, that's your bandwidth getting choked.
Champagne ambition on a beer budget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 865
Reputation: TallCool1 is a jewel in the rough TallCool1 is a jewel in the rough TallCool1 is a jewel in the rough 
Solved Threads: 43
Team Colleague
TallCool1's Avatar
TallCool1 TallCool1 is offline Offline
Practically a Posting Shark

Re: Cable Problems

 
0
  #12
Nov 12th, 2003
Originally Posted by feigned
I'm having a really difficult time believing a 200% increase in speed because of some registry tweaks.

Mine runs at 3Mbs right after a clean installation. If you get 1.7Mbs after a fresh install, that's not XP, that's your bandwidth getting choked.
As I said before, "Maximum transfer units (MTU) settings can have a strong (and variable) effect on transfer speeds." Yes, that much. With a wrong MTU setting (which can vary per provider), the system can be forced to send each packet twice, hence the up-to-50% bandwidth chop. I've seen it. Each install is different -- but quality-of-service conditions do vary quite a bit, as well.
-- Michael Rudas
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way (article by Eric Raymond).
Dealing with Malware
My Articles page.
My Best-of-Breed Free Software for Windows list
Other Windows- & Microsoft-related links
The Audio Tech's Page
My blog
The Oak Park Computer Club
PenguiCon 4.0 Open Source & Science Fiction convention, April 21-23, 2006.
Knoppix Linux (CD-bootable) download. information, & support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Oct 2003
Posts: 311
Reputation: feigned is a jewel in the rough feigned is a jewel in the rough feigned is a jewel in the rough 
Solved Threads: 4
feigned's Avatar
feigned feigned is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Re: Cable Problems

 
0
  #13
Nov 13th, 2003
Originally Posted by TallCool1
As I said before, "Maximum transfer units (MTU) settings can have a strong (and variable) effect on transfer speeds." Yes, that much. With a wrong MTU setting (which can vary per provider), the system can be forced to send each packet twice, hence the up-to-50% bandwidth chop. I've seen it. Each install is different -- but quality-of-service conditions do vary quite a bit, as well.
I wasn't doubting the validity of you statement, just stating that I don't have that problem.

I understand that the MTU can have a drastic effect on speed, for no reason should it effect a fresh installation of Windows.

And for the service quality, if you're getting 3.3Mbps after the tweak, then there's something affecting the installation. Crappy software from the provider, which is ridiculous. Nothing should touch those settings.
Champagne ambition on a beer budget.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Networking Hardware Configuration Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC