To go graphical, or not ?

Please support our Site Layout and Usability advertiser: PostgreSQL or MySQL? Compare and contrast the two most popular open source databases
Reply

Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 427
Reputation: autocrat is on a distinguished road 
Solved Threads: 12
autocrat autocrat is offline Offline
Posting Pro in Training

To go graphical, or not ?

 
0
  #1
Feb 9th, 2005
Hi all,

At present, I have a rather bland WS, simple, clean, black text, white BG, little logo in TL corner etc.... main doy section and banner at top are expandable with page.... JS folding menu etc..... yet I'm not best p[leased... I prefer mor egraphical sites... buttons, flowing forms, obvious distinctions bentween navigation, banner and logo etc.....

Yet I'm not sure what people prefer... any ideas as to what the current trends are?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jul 2004
Posts: 764
Reputation: DaveSW is on a distinguished road 
Solved Threads: 17
DaveSW's Avatar
DaveSW DaveSW is offline Offline
Master Poster

Re: To go graphical, or not ?

 
0
  #2
Feb 9th, 2005
yes there are two. One is the horrible slice-it-up from PhotoShop school. The other is the bland W3 approved original styles moving swiftly towards graphic intensive design.

www.csszengarden.com
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Nov 2004
Posts: 62
Reputation: 2ndPlatform is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
2ndPlatform's Avatar
2ndPlatform 2ndPlatform is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: To go graphical, or not ?

 
0
  #3
Feb 9th, 2005
Originally Posted by autocrat
Hi all,

At present, I have a rather bland WS, simple, clean, black text, white BG, little logo in TL corner etc.... main doy section and banner at top are expandable with page.... JS folding menu etc..... yet I'm not best p[leased... I prefer mor egraphical sites... buttons, flowing forms, obvious distinctions bentween navigation, banner and logo etc.....

Yet I'm not sure what people prefer... any ideas as to what the current trends are?
I think that good website design combines both graphical elements and fast loading non-graphical elements. Photoshop or Fireworks have pretty good features to help you optimize graphics files for the web and make them as small as possible (filesize) while still looking good.

You can also add and control a lot of graphic-seeming elements with stylesheets. Backgrounds, tables, text, divider lines, etc. etc. all add a bit of interest to the site but aren't graphical in nature so they still load fast. You might be able to make your buttons and navigation LOOK graphical and more interesting using CSS and not even have to use graphics.

I do think that a few graphics make the site interesting. You can pull of a really professional looking design with only a few graphics though - so I think you're okay if you use them wisely.

Good luck!
Second Platform
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 427
Reputation: autocrat is on a distinguished road 
Solved Threads: 12
autocrat autocrat is offline Offline
Posting Pro in Training

Re: To go graphical, or not ?

 
0
  #4
Feb 9th, 2005
cheers... just not sure really... can't stand bland, yet hate some of the graphics intense sights I've seen..... I just feel a good banner/header that looks pretty sets the stage, then the content does the work.... having the same content on a bland site just isn't as affective!

NOTE: Try XAT.COM.... I had problems making certain pics smaller for the web using Jasc/Macromedia..... the XAT optimzer works wonders!
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:


Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC