| | |
To go graphical, or not ?
Please support our Site Layout and Usability advertiser: PostgreSQL or MySQL? Compare and contrast the two most popular open source databases
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 427
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 12
Hi all,
At present, I have a rather bland WS, simple, clean, black text, white BG, little logo in TL corner etc.... main doy section and banner at top are expandable with page.... JS folding menu etc..... yet I'm not best p[leased... I prefer mor egraphical sites... buttons, flowing forms, obvious distinctions bentween navigation, banner and logo etc.....
Yet I'm not sure what people prefer... any ideas as to what the current trends are?
At present, I have a rather bland WS, simple, clean, black text, white BG, little logo in TL corner etc.... main doy section and banner at top are expandable with page.... JS folding menu etc..... yet I'm not best p[leased... I prefer mor egraphical sites... buttons, flowing forms, obvious distinctions bentween navigation, banner and logo etc.....
Yet I'm not sure what people prefer... any ideas as to what the current trends are?
yes there are two. One is the horrible slice-it-up from PhotoShop school. The other is the bland W3 approved original styles moving swiftly towards graphic intensive design.
www.csszengarden.com
www.csszengarden.com
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by autocrat
Hi all,
At present, I have a rather bland WS, simple, clean, black text, white BG, little logo in TL corner etc.... main doy section and banner at top are expandable with page.... JS folding menu etc..... yet I'm not best p[leased... I prefer mor egraphical sites... buttons, flowing forms, obvious distinctions bentween navigation, banner and logo etc.....
Yet I'm not sure what people prefer... any ideas as to what the current trends are?
You can also add and control a lot of graphic-seeming elements with stylesheets. Backgrounds, tables, text, divider lines, etc. etc. all add a bit of interest to the site but aren't graphical in nature so they still load fast. You might be able to make your buttons and navigation LOOK graphical and more interesting using CSS and not even have to use graphics.
I do think that a few graphics make the site interesting. You can pull of a really professional looking design with only a few graphics though - so I think you're okay if you use them wisely.
Good luck!
Second Platform
Web Design in Wisconsin : Milwaukee Web Design : Second Platform
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2005
Posts: 427
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 12
cheers... just not sure really... can't stand bland, yet hate some of the graphics intense sights I've seen..... I just feel a good banner/header that looks pretty sets the stage, then the content does the work.... having the same content on a bland site just isn't as affective!
NOTE: Try XAT.COM.... I had problems making certain pics smaller for the web using Jasc/Macromedia..... the XAT optimzer works wonders!
NOTE: Try XAT.COM.... I had problems making certain pics smaller for the web using Jasc/Macromedia..... the XAT optimzer works wonders!
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Graphical Chat program (ASP.NET)
- open a folder in graphical mode using c++ and linux os (C++)
- Create Graphical reports in Ms Word Using Code from VB6 (Visual Basic 4 / 5 / 6)
- Text vs Graphical interface research paper (Computer Science)
- Program that shows a graphical representation of hard disk surface problems? (Storage)
- graphical roulette game (Game Development)
- How to learn graphical part of C++? (C++)
- NOOB question , graphical tiles (C++)
Other Threads in the Site Layout and Usability Forum
- Previous Thread: W3C guidelines are vague or good?
- Next Thread: Fly-out Menu in java script
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
blogging content customer design development dreamweaver duplicate email evaluation filesharing firefox flash gilbane google html itunes javascript kazaa layout music napster peertopeer photoshop remote remoteserver satellitenavigation satnav server site tables template tips tomtom url wave web website websitedesignreview web_development web_sites





