| | |
How to handle spam?
Please support our Growing an Online Community advertiser: Get a Free Web Site Analysis!
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2005
Posts: 1
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I am wondering how people handle spam in forums.
So far I've disabled signatures for users with less than 10 posts but I'm wondering if I can do more. I've thought about disabling live links completely for users with less than 10 posts but I'm not sure how effective this would be.
Also, what do you think about people registering usernames that are there domain names? To be tolerated or not?
And signatures. I have some users with just a list of links, up to maybe 6 - 8 links in a signature. Do think it is unreasonable to limit users to say 3 lines of text and maybe 2 links etc.
I'd be interested to know your thoughts on this and what you have done about it.
Cheers!
So far I've disabled signatures for users with less than 10 posts but I'm wondering if I can do more. I've thought about disabling live links completely for users with less than 10 posts but I'm not sure how effective this would be.
Also, what do you think about people registering usernames that are there domain names? To be tolerated or not?
And signatures. I have some users with just a list of links, up to maybe 6 - 8 links in a signature. Do think it is unreasonable to limit users to say 3 lines of text and maybe 2 links etc.
I'd be interested to know your thoughts on this and what you have done about it.
Cheers!
When you say "spam", you really have to be more specific;
Many malicious users will simply spam threads with useless/inaproppriate (spelling!) materials. This can be stopped slightly by enabling "Spam control" of about 30-60 seconds.
One thing you MUST disable is HTML in signatures. Users can create spam codes such as opening multiple windows in their signature, usually linking to more unacceptable sites.
Limiting links to other sites is pretty useless, as the point of forums are to create circles off communities of the same subject, but if you feel some members will leech your community strongly then limiting links may help.
Limiting the number of characters in a signature is a good move, usually to about 300-500 characters in my opinion.
The sad truth is, though, no matter how hard you try "rage" or "grief" groups will always be able to bypass these anti-spam measures, but they usually have a motive i.e. they have placed some sort of attack on the group in a verbal manner, or "bashing" them on their site/forum, or they find the content humorous in one way or another and simply spam it for amusement. The best way to counter-attack these are simply to stay calm, delete and ban as many users as possible (however many use proxies so keeping them away permenantly is impossible in some cases), or if things get too over the top, simply take the boards offline for a week or so.
The thing to remember is that these attacks are rare, and you may come accross the odd immature user, but they are easily dealt with.
Many malicious users will simply spam threads with useless/inaproppriate (spelling!) materials. This can be stopped slightly by enabling "Spam control" of about 30-60 seconds.
One thing you MUST disable is HTML in signatures. Users can create spam codes such as opening multiple windows in their signature, usually linking to more unacceptable sites.
Limiting links to other sites is pretty useless, as the point of forums are to create circles off communities of the same subject, but if you feel some members will leech your community strongly then limiting links may help.
Limiting the number of characters in a signature is a good move, usually to about 300-500 characters in my opinion.
The sad truth is, though, no matter how hard you try "rage" or "grief" groups will always be able to bypass these anti-spam measures, but they usually have a motive i.e. they have placed some sort of attack on the group in a verbal manner, or "bashing" them on their site/forum, or they find the content humorous in one way or another and simply spam it for amusement. The best way to counter-attack these are simply to stay calm, delete and ban as many users as possible (however many use proxies so keeping them away permenantly is impossible in some cases), or if things get too over the top, simply take the boards offline for a week or so.
The thing to remember is that these attacks are rare, and you may come accross the odd immature user, but they are easily dealt with.
Usally a good team of moderators can take care of spam.
Are you saying my sig is bad?
Are you saying my sig is bad?
PETA People for the Eating of Tasty Animals.
FireFox
Hijack This
Ad-Aware
Hijack this tutorial
Microsoft AntiSpyware
CompUchat
FireFox
Hijack This
Ad-Aware
Hijack this tutorial
Microsoft AntiSpyware
CompUchat
•
•
Join Date: Jan 2005
Posts: 15
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Add the new tag to your forum which makes spamming useless.
http://www.google.com/googleblog/200...ment-spam.html
http://www.google.com/googleblog/200...ment-spam.html
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Would a CAN-Spam type regulation be helpful or harmful to social media? (Growing an Online Community)
- PDF Spam - a Step ahead of Image Spam (Network Security)
- News Story: Fingerprinting technology spells end of image spam (Show Off your Projects)
- News Story: Spam: The Dirty Dozen (Viruses, Spyware and other Nasties)
Other Threads in the Growing an Online Community Forum
- Previous Thread: Moderators, what good are they.
- Next Thread: Worst Way to Grow a Community?
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
analytics aol b2c bebo bing blockbuster bloggers blogging blogs building business celebrity censorship communities community content craigslist crime davidmeermanscott digg digitalmovierentals e-businesscard e-learning education eff election employment engagement enterprise enterprise2.0 facebook facebookfriends forrester ftc gambling gender gmail google government handle influencers internet iphone issues leavingdatatrails legal linkedin marketing mashable media membership microblogging mobile myspace netflix networking news obama online onlinemovies opensource phishing pirates policy politics privacy psychographics reader research retweet school security small social socialmedia socialmediameasurement socialnetworking socialnetworks stories stress study success survey technology trademark transparency tweetdeck tweeting twitter user video viral virtual wave web web2.0 webanalytics wordpress yahoo youtube





