| | |
Bold
Please support our HTML and CSS advertiser: PostgreSQL or MySQL? Compare and contrast the two most popular open source databases
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 207
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 1
<strong> is XHTML compliant I think
(Something to that effect, but both tags accomplish the same thing)
(Something to that effect, but both tags accomplish the same thing)
•
•
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 207
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 1
I did a google search and I came up with the following stuffs:
and
•
•
•
•
<strong> and <em> came first, then <b> and <i>, which became popular for use with the <font> tag. <font> has become depricated, possibly <b> and <i> will follow as <strong> and <em> more closely follow the origianl spirit if HTML and separating content from mark-up.
There is no real difference, except for that pesky habit of some browsers to employ one recommendation while another ignores recommendations all together.
•
•
•
•
The <strong> and <em> tags are "logical" tags. This means that they are used deliberately when the designer wants to add emphasis to particular words or phrases. Some screen readers may use a different inflection when they come across these tags to communicate the emphasis. The <b> and <i> tags are primarily for visual effect on a page when designing layout.
Hmm, very interesting. I always used to use strong but now I alternate. Which would you recommend if I was trying to be XHTML compliant?
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by cscgal
Then why does vBulletin 3 gamma - with the new XHTML compliant styles - use <b> ?
There's a lot of content out there < HTML 4 that uses the <b> tag. I doubt any time soon that it would not be supported. The good thing about XML is it doesn't matter what tag it uses, you can always apply some stylesheet and apply your own style (even if the browsers decide not to support the <b> tag in the future).
Personally, I prefer using shorter tags. I'd rather use the <b>, or <i> tag but I'm sticking to the longer tags (<strong> and <em>). They will be more mainstream in the long run.
Personally, I prefer using shorter tags. I'd rather use the <b>, or <i> tag but I'm sticking to the longer tags (<strong> and <em>). They will be more mainstream in the long run.
Last edited by samaru; Jan 3rd, 2004 at 3:21 am.
Check out my blog at http://www.shinylight.com for more stuff about web dev.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- News Story: Blackberry Bold Pulled From Shelves in Japan (Upcoming News Stories)
- News Story: To Rival iPhone, A 'Bold' Move by RIM (Windows Software)
- News Story: BlackBerry Bold is the Next iPhone Killer. Or Not. (Apple Hardware)
- Changing font to bold in datagrid at runtime (VB.NET)
- Outlook 2k3 replies in Bold? (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- my #include <string> wont make "string" bold (C++)
Other Threads in the HTML and CSS Forum
- Previous Thread: Help me about Http Client Post method
- Next Thread: CSS positioning problems
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
appointments asp background backgroundcolor beta browser bug calendar cart cgi code codeinjection corporateidentity css design development displayimageinsteadofflash dreamweaver emailmarketing epilepsy explorer firefox flash form format google griefers hackers hitcounter hover html ide ie7 ie8 iframe image images internet internetexplorer intranet iphone javascript jpeg layout macbook maps marketshare microsoft mozilla multimedia navigationbars news offshoreoutsourcingcompany opacity opera optimization pnginie6 positioning problem scroll seo shopping studio swf swf. textcolor timecolor titletags url urlseparatedwords visual visualization web webdevelopment webform website windows7







