W3C Validation

Thread Solved

Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 282
Reputation: Roberdin will become famous soon enough Roberdin will become famous soon enough 
Solved Threads: 6
Team Colleague
Roberdin Roberdin is offline Offline
Supreme Evil Overlord

W3C Validation

 
0
  #1
Jan 12th, 2004
Dani... I'm disappointed in you.

Results of Webpage Validation

Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 781
Reputation: Zachery has a spectacular aura about Zachery has a spectacular aura about 
Solved Threads: 21
Team Colleague
Zachery's Avatar
Zachery Zachery is offline Offline
The Geek Father

Re: W3C Validation

 
0
  #2
Jan 12th, 2004
Originally Posted by Roberdin
Dani... I'm disappointed in you.

Results of Webpage Validation

its just one tag that probally hasnt been updated in a while
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,036
Reputation: cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light 
Solved Threads: 128
Administrator
Staff Writer
cscgal's Avatar
cscgal cscgal is offline Offline
The Queen of DaniWeb

Re: W3C Validation

 
0
  #3
Jan 12th, 2004
So what is the XHTML-compliant version of the li tag? To make the bullets??
Dani the Computer Science Gal
Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/daniweb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,036
Reputation: cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light 
Solved Threads: 128
Administrator
Staff Writer
cscgal's Avatar
cscgal cscgal is offline Offline
The Queen of DaniWeb

Re: W3C Validation

 
0
  #4
Jan 12th, 2004
Ahh, I see .... I need something else to start my list. Gotcha.
Dani the Computer Science Gal
Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/daniweb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 12,036
Reputation: cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light cscgal is a glorious beacon of light 
Solved Threads: 128
Administrator
Staff Writer
cscgal's Avatar
cscgal cscgal is offline Offline
The Queen of DaniWeb

Re: W3C Validation

 
0
  #5
Jan 12th, 2004
It's fixed but oh my goodness gracious http://www.techtalkforums.com has a whole lotta problems and I don't know how to fix all of them
Dani the Computer Science Gal
Follow my Twitter feed! twitter.com/daniweb
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,135
Reputation: samaru is just really nice samaru is just really nice samaru is just really nice samaru is just really nice 
Solved Threads: 6
Team Colleague
samaru's Avatar
samaru samaru is offline Offline
a.k.a inscissor

Re: W3C Validation

 
0
  #6
Jan 13th, 2004
Dani, I think your web site is fine. There's not at least ONE COOL LOOKING web site that's feature rich that can pass any sort of validation. Web sites that pass validation are web sites like http://www.useit.com/ or http://www.w3.org - but they're boring, ugly, and have no where near the functionality that a site like this has.
Check out my blog at http://www.shinylight.com for more stuff about web dev.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,135
Reputation: samaru is just really nice samaru is just really nice samaru is just really nice samaru is just really nice 
Solved Threads: 6
Team Colleague
samaru's Avatar
samaru samaru is offline Offline
a.k.a inscissor

Re: W3C Validation

 
0
  #7
Jan 13th, 2004
I hate to say, but in my experience, it seems that only programmers, who rarely have graphic abilities, are interested in validation. I should know, I'm a programmer. Then again, I'm a graphic designer too.
Check out my blog at http://www.shinylight.com for more stuff about web dev.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Nov 2003
Posts: 781
Reputation: Zachery has a spectacular aura about Zachery has a spectacular aura about 
Solved Threads: 21
Team Colleague
Zachery's Avatar
Zachery Zachery is offline Offline
The Geek Father

Re: W3C Validation

 
0
  #8
Jan 13th, 2004
Originally Posted by inscissor
I hate to say, but in my experience, it seems that only programmers, who rarely have graphic abilities, are interested in validation. I should know, I'm a programmer. Then again, I'm a graphic designer too.
i dunno my site should pass all w3c validations includeing CSS and XHTML 1.0 and it looks purdy damn nice >.<
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 282
Reputation: Roberdin will become famous soon enough Roberdin will become famous soon enough 
Solved Threads: 6
Team Colleague
Roberdin Roberdin is offline Offline
Supreme Evil Overlord

Re: W3C Validation

 
0
  #9
Jan 13th, 2004
Originally Posted by inscissor
Dani, I think your web site is fine. There's not at least ONE COOL LOOKING web site that's feature rich that can pass any sort of validation. Web sites that pass validation are web sites like http://www.useit.com/ or http://www.w3.org - but they're boring, ugly, and have no where near the functionality that a site like this has.
All sites should and can pass validation with a few tweaks. It's a highly useful tool that means your site will dispaly correctly on a wealth of browsers.
The default style of most forum software is written to pass validation.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2002
Posts: 1,135
Reputation: samaru is just really nice samaru is just really nice samaru is just really nice samaru is just really nice 
Solved Threads: 6
Team Colleague
samaru's Avatar
samaru samaru is offline Offline
a.k.a inscissor

Re: W3C Validation

 
0
  #10
Jan 13th, 2004
Originally Posted by Roberdin
All sites should and can pass validation with a few tweaks. It's a highly useful tool that means your site will dispaly correctly on a wealth of browsers.
The default style of most forum software is written to pass validation.
I agree with the word should. There are other things that also SHOULD be. Software should be free. Software should not have bugs. Software should be super optimized. Why isn't this always the case? Green little pieces of paper?

I know what you mean. But from a business perspective, sometimes this can't happen. Time is money, and validating and making sure everything is too perfect adds another layer of time to your project. This can be a tedious task when working with complex web sites and just can't happen.
Check out my blog at http://www.shinylight.com for more stuff about web dev.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread has been marked solved.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the HTML and CSS Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC