Apple Goes to Intel

View Poll Results: What is the effect of Apple switching to Intel?
It won't effect me. 8 80.00%
It will effect me because none of my software will work on the new macs 0 0%
Who Cares? 2 20.00%
Voters: 10. You may not vote on this poll

Reply

Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 350
Reputation: Ghost is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 2
Ghost's Avatar
Ghost Ghost is offline Offline
Posting Whiz

Apple Goes to Intel

 
0
  #1
Jun 15th, 2005
What do you think about Apple using Intel chips?
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 3,826
Reputation: Catweazle is a jewel in the rough Catweazle is a jewel in the rough Catweazle is a jewel in the rough Catweazle is a jewel in the rough 
Solved Threads: 144
Team Colleague
Catweazle Catweazle is offline Offline
Grandad

Re: Apple Goes to Intel

 
0
  #2
Jun 15th, 2005
Very little actually. It's simply a sensible move on Apple's part, because Intel can more reliably produce adequate processors than IBM seems to be able to.

Won't effect software at all, probably, because existing software can still be run via a software technology to be called 'Rosetta'. Even if that proves to give a performance 'hit' (which it's reported not to) then it's still untrue to claim that existing software (won't run).

By the way, there's an existing topic about this in the appropriate forum section:
http://www.daniweb.com/techtalkforums/thread25138.html
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,620
Reputation: kc0arf is a jewel in the rough kc0arf is a jewel in the rough kc0arf is a jewel in the rough 
Solved Threads: 50
Team Colleague
kc0arf kc0arf is offline Offline
Posting Virtuoso

Re: Apple Goes to Intel

 
0
  #3
Jun 15th, 2005
Hi,

I have to choose other. I think it is great that Apple is looking at Intel for processor support, and I think the programs will work nicely.

Apple's Mac line has already had 2 major computing shifts. The first time was when we went from Motorola 680x0 code to the PowerPC code (anyone remember fat binaries?) The second shift was from Mac OS 9 to Mac OS X. In both cases, the world did not stop, but yes, some notable thorns (hello QUARK!) did not optimize their software for the new platform in a timely matter.

I am excited.

Christian
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 130
Reputation: StandardsDT is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
StandardsDT's Avatar
StandardsDT StandardsDT is offline Offline
Junior Poster

Re: Apple Goes to Intel

 
0
  #4
Jul 14th, 2005
cpu is low for priorities list. they should mainly be focusing on other things for their computer. dont get me wrong i really like apple computers but they should be focusing more on their other things such as some of things they cant match up to that microsoft has that apple doesnt. the only thing apple really has going for them is the image manipulation.

- Dave
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Dec 2003
Posts: 2,414
Reputation: alc6379 has a spectacular aura about alc6379 has a spectacular aura about alc6379 has a spectacular aura about 
Solved Threads: 122
Team Colleague
alc6379's Avatar
alc6379 alc6379 is offline Offline
Cookie... That's it

Re: Apple Goes to Intel

 
0
  #5
Jul 14th, 2005
Originally Posted by ratm456
cpu is low for priorities list. they should mainly be focusing on other things for their computer. dont get me wrong i really like apple computers but they should be focusing more on their other things such as some of things they cant match up to that microsoft has that apple doesnt. the only thing apple really has going for them is the image manipulation.

- Dave
With the exception of gaming, what exactly is the Mac lacking?

I can't think of a single category that a Mac can't compete with a PC on nowadays. Sure, you might not get completely native ports of many PC programs for the Mac, but I'm not really seeing a lack on their side of the fence.
Alex Cavnar, aka alc6379
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Jul 2005
Posts: 130
Reputation: StandardsDT is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
StandardsDT's Avatar
StandardsDT StandardsDT is offline Offline
Junior Poster

Re: Apple Goes to Intel

 
0
  #6
Jul 14th, 2005
Originally Posted by alc6379
With the exception of gaming, what exactly is the Mac lacking?

I can't think of a single category that a Mac can't compete with a PC on nowadays. Sure, you might not get completely native ports of many PC programs for the Mac, but I'm not really seeing a lack on their side of the fence.
Macs lack in alot of respects. Software availability being their biggest obstacle. I would not say they lack in power just simply they lack in market share and market compatability. I see more software coming out for Linux these days than I see for Mac.

- Dave
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the IT Professionals' Lounge Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC