| | |
Key Features of Apache 2.0
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I have been asked to "Analyse & Compare the Key Features of IIS 6.0 & Apache 2.0" I have to present it to my management team and it should not be to "Techie". I have found plenty on IIS but am struggling on Apache 2.0. Any details on Security, Reliability, Scalability and Ease of Use would be ideal as that is the headings I have for IIS. Many thanks. DB
DB,
What sort of applications are you going to be running, do you have a choice between linux and windows or, windows running IIS and windows running Apache.
How much expirence do you have with IIS over apache?
Are you confortable with config files or do you need a UI ?
What sort of applications are you going to be running, do you have a choice between linux and windows or, windows running IIS and windows running Apache.
How much expirence do you have with IIS over apache?
Are you confortable with config files or do you need a UI ?
Firefox: no, its not the end all solution, it has its own issues and in time it will be just as insecure as IE, when its hit Firefox 6, if it makes it that far. Oh, and AOL pays for it, incase you didn't know.
Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 3
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Zachery,
Whatever solution, IIS or Apache, will most probably sit on a windows server system. I won't personally be running it, I just have to present the main features of each to management so they can make an informed decision on what to go for. As I said I have loads of info on IIS but not much on Apache. I know it is the most popular choice with around 70% of web hosts using it but what are its key features that I can compare to IIS. Stability, Security, Ease of management, Scalability etc DB
Whatever solution, IIS or Apache, will most probably sit on a windows server system. I won't personally be running it, I just have to present the main features of each to management so they can make an informed decision on what to go for. As I said I have loads of info on IIS but not much on Apache. I know it is the most popular choice with around 70% of web hosts using it but what are its key features that I can compare to IIS. Stability, Security, Ease of management, Scalability etc DB
Well like I said, if you are going to be running ASP.net apps theres no logical reason to run apache 
Abit more insight would help one way or another. Apache has been around a long time, and is a long standing httpd server in the linux world, less used in the windows world, since its time tested and tempered it has less security issues. It will run about par with IIS in terms of real world preformance at least in realition to php / mysql sites.

Abit more insight would help one way or another. Apache has been around a long time, and is a long standing httpd server in the linux world, less used in the windows world, since its time tested and tempered it has less security issues. It will run about par with IIS in terms of real world preformance at least in realition to php / mysql sites.
Firefox: no, its not the end all solution, it has its own issues and in time it will be just as insecure as IE, when its hit Firefox 6, if it makes it that far. Oh, and AOL pays for it, incase you didn't know.
Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
It really depends on your application.
If you are going to be running asp and asp.net apps there is NO REASON to run apache, because theres no support for it
If you are going to be running a php site, you have a 50/50 shot, with it, depending on your setup and your specific NT OS
If you are going to be running asp and asp.net apps there is NO REASON to run apache, because theres no support for it
If you are going to be running a php site, you have a 50/50 shot, with it, depending on your setup and your specific NT OS
Firefox: no, its not the end all solution, it has its own issues and in time it will be just as insecure as IE, when its hit Firefox 6, if it makes it that far. Oh, and AOL pays for it, incase you didn't know.
Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
Microsoft & Windows: If you hate it so much, move to linux, or bsd, or anything else, stop complaning and move on.
Good starting places: Gentoo Novell SUSE Fedora Core Apple
![]() |
Similar Threads
- First post need some help! (Site Layout and Usability)
- office scheduling (VB.NET)
- Neuron Visual C++ (C++)
Other Threads in the Linux Servers and Apache Forum
- Previous Thread: Apache on a nix cluster - config question
- Next Thread: cannot run php on apache
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
.net apache apple asus bbc bluegene centos cisco citrix cloud cloudcomputing datacenters debian dell desktops development distributions distros drivers economy eeepc energy enterprise fedora gadgets gentoo gos government gpl hardware hp hyper-v ibm java jobs kindle knoppix kvm laptop laptops lawsuits licensing limo linustorvalds linux linuxfoundation linuxmagazine magazines microserver microsoft mobile mobilephones netbook netbooks news novell olpc open openmoko openoffice opensolaris opensource opensuse openvz operatingsystems os patents pc pcworld plathome politics print qumranet redhat rhel robot russia sco server servers slackware software solaris source sun supercomputer support tivo torvalds training tv ubuntu umpc unix virtualization vmware windows x86 xandros xen





