| | |
Windows dynamic disk question
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2005
Posts: 1
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Hi,
I've got 4 full hard drives that i'd quite like to join together (in raid0-esque style), but i don't want to lose the data on the disks in doing so, which ruled out actual raid. Someone mentioned that I can use windows dynamic disks to emulate this behaviour.
I was wondering if converting these disks to windows dynamic disks would cause any data loss initially, and what the effect of one disk failing would be if they were all joined together (i.e. would they all become pretty useless as they would with raid 0).
Thanks,
Matt
I've got 4 full hard drives that i'd quite like to join together (in raid0-esque style), but i don't want to lose the data on the disks in doing so, which ruled out actual raid. Someone mentioned that I can use windows dynamic disks to emulate this behaviour.
I was wondering if converting these disks to windows dynamic disks would cause any data loss initially, and what the effect of one disk failing would be if they were all joined together (i.e. would they all become pretty useless as they would with raid 0).
Thanks,
Matt
•
•
Join Date: Mar 2004
Posts: 1,620
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 51
Hello,
I am not certain if you can upgrade basic to dynamic disks, and keep the data intact. My gut feeling says no, and I would not attempt to do such a thing without backups.
You did say you had backups, right?
Converting the disks to a RAID, even in software, will disrupt the information on them. Why? Because of how a RAID behaves, by definition.
The logical partition on RAID 0 systems become useless if one of the disks fails. The disks will be fine hardware wise, but the logical partitions will be corrupted upon failure.
Christian
I am not certain if you can upgrade basic to dynamic disks, and keep the data intact. My gut feeling says no, and I would not attempt to do such a thing without backups.
You did say you had backups, right?
Converting the disks to a RAID, even in software, will disrupt the information on them. Why? Because of how a RAID behaves, by definition.
The logical partition on RAID 0 systems become useless if one of the disks fails. The disks will be fine hardware wise, but the logical partitions will be corrupted upon failure.
Christian
![]() |
Similar Threads
- windows no disk (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Windows Media Services question abotu securing access (Windows Servers and IIS)
- Question on vista disk management? (Windows Vista and Windows 7)
- Windows XP Installation Disk (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Problem after converting to dynamic disk (Storage)
- ULTIMATE HARD DISK SETTINGS - brain racking question (Storage)
- Hard Disk Performance Is Slower Than You Expect (Windows tips 'n' tweaks)
Other Threads in the Windows NT / 2000 / XP Forum
- Previous Thread: Computer wont start
- Next Thread: New server to replace old W2K DC server
Views: 2751 | Replies: 1
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Tag cloud for Windows NT / 2000 / XP
.net 3.5 3daccelertion 64bit 2007 2010 a.exe activedirectory address alaris android apache application arm auto automatically black blue boot bsod bulletin canonical chinese chkdsk codeplex collaboration combofix computerfreezes cursor deployments desktop desktops domain downloads drive eartlink error explorer fax firefox fonts format framework freeze gadgets home install intel internet killprocess laptop linux mac microsoft mobile monitor motionle1600 netbooks nvidia open opensource operatingsystems options osinstallationproblem palm partition patch port printer program proxy raid rds reformat remotedesktopconnection repair retrieve screen server. sharepoint sitetositevpn slowperformance sp1 studios ubuntu unreadable update upgrade virtual virus volume vpn vulnerability webos weecam windows windows7 windowsxp xp xpde






