| | |
Please support our Computer Science advertiser: Learn about neural networks and artificial intelligence.
![]() |
well, i think AI are going to be like the robots in asimovs foundation series. but i may have spent too many hours up lately
..Spuskayas k velikay reke, mhe vse ostavlyayem sledeh na peske... i lodka skolzeet v temnote. anam ostayutsya kruge na vade. - mashina vremeni
Fear the Fearsome fury of the smiling DM
Fear the Fearsome fury of the smiling DM
AI's will always be artificial as long as were the ones making it. In the far furture AI will be the closest thing to the human brain (by then i bet computers will be molecular instead of electrical since molecules accept sequences in ABCD opposed to just a 0 or 1;thus, faster), ofcourse we have to fully understand our brain first.
A Hacker's Mind:
"I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes..." - J.D.Salinger
"I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes..." - J.D.Salinger
Hi,
Hmmm...interesting topic
. I think most significant thing we can say about AI is that it will never be like us. Sometimes I start forgetting that we're not just grey matter - recently watched a documentery about a lady here in England who was air-head.
She had a massive hole in her brain -
- so big that she only had thin layer of grey matter attached to the inside of her skull! But guess what? It doesn't affect her behaviour or intelligence in any way:!: .
I reckon our intelligence is itself half-artificial. We might even be able to emulate it in robots etc.. We're more than intelligence:-| , or emotion:cry: .
Thats what I think anyway....
....I love these smilies.. :cheesy: ..can't get enough pf them...lol
Hmmm...interesting topic
. I think most significant thing we can say about AI is that it will never be like us. Sometimes I start forgetting that we're not just grey matter - recently watched a documentery about a lady here in England who was air-head. She had a massive hole in her brain -
- so big that she only had thin layer of grey matter attached to the inside of her skull! But guess what? It doesn't affect her behaviour or intelligence in any way:!: .I reckon our intelligence is itself half-artificial. We might even be able to emulate it in robots etc.. We're more than intelligence:-| , or emotion:cry: .
Thats what I think anyway....
....I love these smilies.. :cheesy: ..can't get enough pf them...lol When the moon of happiness rose over the horizon of my will, I set out for the sun of arrival
Define AI. If I were to say, emotion set us apart from AI, that would be bs since someone could just program AI to have emotion. The only thing I can really think of that would sprout a real argument is that we are spiritual beings and the mind and body are totally different entities. Anyway, just something to think about. 
Slade

Slade
Formerly known as Slade.
•
•
Join Date: May 2004
Posts: 65
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 4
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Toba
From what I've heard, programs are considered AI when they can fool a human being into thinking they are human (ie. over IRC chat or similar). ...
Here's an article that may be of interest... I'll throw in a quote from the article (italics mine):
Turing intended his test specifically as a measure of human intelligence. An entity passing the Turing test may be said to be intelligent, and moreover, to possess a human-form of intelligence. Turing specifically states that the converse statement does not hold, that failure to pass the test does not indicate a lack of intelligence.Much depends on how you decide to define "intelligence" and how exactly you go about measuring it.
Further reading:
http://tekhnema.free.fr/3Lasseguearticle.htm
http://www.pcmag.com/article2/0,4149,1200185,00.asp
http://www.google.com/search?hl=en&i...&q=Turing+test :)
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Toba
... Several programs have been able to do this sucessfully.
I'm of the opinion that if the person asking the questions is clever enough, he/she will be able to trip any program written to date into revealing itself as not a human being. I won't say that it'll never happen, but we're far from creating anything that will really pass that particular test.
--sg
![]() |
Other Threads in the Computer Science Forum
- Previous Thread: High-Level Languages
- Next Thread: linking to specific frame arrangements?
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
ai algorithm algorithms amazon assignment assignmenthelp assignments automata battery bigbrother binary bittorrent bletchleypark bomb business cern codebreaker compiler computer computerscience computertrackingsoftware connect conversion csc dataanalysis dataintepretation development dfa dissertation dissertations dissertationthesis dissertationtopic ebook employment energy floatingpoint foreclosure foreclosuresoftware fuel gadgets geeks givemetehcodez government graphics hardware history homeowners homeworkassignment homeworkhelp humor ibm idea internet iphone ipod itcontracts jobs kindle laser laws lsmeans mainframes marketing mobileapplication msaccess nano netbeans networking news os p2p piracy piratebay principles rasterizer research sam-being-cute sas science software spying stephenfry study supercomputer sweden technology textfield turing turingtest two'scompliment uk virus ww2






.