 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
The 10th Planet
 |
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by Cain
This is a cool discovery even if the retards are going to argue the "is it a planet or not?" question to death.
•
•
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 10,015
Reputation: 
Solved Threads: 759
I believe that Cain is/was referring to the scientists as 'retards,' or at least, that is how I read it.
Let's keep the name calling out of it and not get personal please
.
Let's keep the name calling out of it and not get personal please
. Proud member of ASAP (Alliance of Security analysis Professionals).
Opera AVAST anti-virus Comodo Firewall Spywareblaster
Opera AVAST anti-virus Comodo Firewall Spywareblaster
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by crunchie
I believe that Cain is/was referring to the scientists as 'retards,' or at least, that is how I read it.
Let's keep the name calling out of it and not get personal please
Something interesting thing is that in 280 years it will be as close as Neptune. I wonder if it means it will exit the Kuiper Belt like Pluto does. If so, why couldnt it be called a planet if Pluto is one?
Its a very interesting subject.
•
•
Join Date: Aug 2004
Posts: 298
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 2
Posting Whiz in Training
•
•
•
•
Originally Posted by server_crash
Excuse me? No one ever questioned wether it was a cool discovery, YOU retard. Maybe if you can't understand what context something was said in, you don't need to call somone a retard.
Yup, was talking about the scientists...
...now who is out of context?
I used up all my money on you baby...
... and I want it BACK.
... and I want it BACK.
Well, given that the definition of "planet" isn't set in stone there's bound to be people (including scientists who often have highly inflamable brains) who will argue that these are not planets.
There is no limit as to what is a planet described in things like size and orbit.
And as these objects (there's actually 3 of them, though only one made the news) are both in a region where objects are not generally classed as planets (and with the orbits to suit) and are of a size which DOES class them as planets (as they're as large as or larger than the smallest recognised planets) there's option for debate.
There is no limit as to what is a planet described in things like size and orbit.
And as these objects (there's actually 3 of them, though only one made the news) are both in a region where objects are not generally classed as planets (and with the orbits to suit) and are of a size which DOES class them as planets (as they're as large as or larger than the smallest recognised planets) there's option for debate.
As people are clearly allowed to attack me but I'm not allowed to defend myself, I no longer post to this site.
|
Other Threads in the Geeks' Lounge Forum
- Previous Thread: Cracker v/s developer who is winning ?
- Next Thread: Freedom of expression
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
You need to join our community in order to build your list of favorite forums. You can visit the forum index for a listing of all forums.
Related Forum Features
Latest Geeks' Lounge Posts
- Today's Posts
- Unanswered Threads
amazon apple article bankrupt bankruptcy bear beard beijing bot clocks code cognitive_disorder console consoles convert cracked.com daniweb design development disk dlc ebook election empty facebook feed fun games gaming garbage google grandtheftauto gta gtaiv halo3 hardware hunting internet java kids kindle knife library life linux mad madden manly marketing mars merger microsoft murder netbook news nintendo obama odf operating opinion os outlook pain parentalcontrol parenting planning playstation population ps3 ps4 python research rss search sims software softwaredevelopment sony source stocks study subversion systems timeisonmyside. unused usarmy vapid videogames viruses wave wii windows windows>all windows_wins world worldofwarcraft www xbox xbox360 zomg_conspiracy
