 |  |  |  |  |  |  |  |
In which (really) important ways is SQL 2000 better than Access 2003?
Please support our MS SQL advertiser: Intel Parallel Studio Home
 |
I have developed some webpages using asp and they work fine on my computer with Access 2003 (using iis as a local server). However, I am aware that SQL 2000 is a better db to use, but I am not sure in which ways.
Since I intend to put my asp pages on a webserver I wonder what the advantages for me (if I use SQL 2000 instead) would be. The areas I am most interested in is the maximum number of users that the two databases can handled at one time and of course security issues.
Would my database be better protected against hackers etc. if I go with SQL 2000 instead?
Other important differences?
Since I intend to put my asp pages on a webserver I wonder what the advantages for me (if I use SQL 2000 instead) would be. The areas I am most interested in is the maximum number of users that the two databases can handled at one time and of course security issues.
Would my database be better protected against hackers etc. if I go with SQL 2000 instead?
Other important differences?
|
Similar Threads
- SQL 2000 - getting data from two databases, same server (MS SQL)
- Error in loading DLL (Error 48) in Access 2003 (MS Access and FileMaker Pro)
- can we connect VB 6 wtih databases in Ms Office Access 2003? (Visual Basic 4 / 5 / 6)
- VB and MS-sql 2000 data navigation (Visual Basic 4 / 5 / 6)
- mid problem in access 2003 (Windows NT / 2000 / XP)
- Ms Sql 2000 (MS SQL)
Other Threads in the MS SQL Forum
- Previous Thread: can not connect to db
- Next Thread: sql*plus or pl/sql question
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
You need to join our community in order to build your list of favorite forums. You can visit the forum index for a listing of all forums.
Related Forum Features
Latest MS SQL Posts
- Today's Posts
- Unanswered Threads
