Reply

Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 865
Reputation: TallCool1 is a jewel in the rough TallCool1 is a jewel in the rough TallCool1 is a jewel in the rough 
Solved Threads: 43
Team Colleague
TallCool1's Avatar
TallCool1 TallCool1 is offline Offline
Practically a Posting Shark

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #11
Feb 27th, 2004
Originally Posted by oalee
Thank you very much for the info RC_Razor. what if my win2k crashes and I want to boot from a floppy? is there a bootdisk that can access an NTFS? if there is, then I'll probably have to repartition my HDD to NTFS since everything you've said sums up everything to the NTFS being way much better than FAT/FAT32.
Your new partitions should be NTFS. It's more reliable and can handle larger files. Contrary to earlier posts, it's FAT32 that has a 2GB-per-file limit, the limit for NTFS is much higher.

I generally reserve about a 10 GB partition for Windows, the rest for data. The data partition should be NTFS, too - but be aware that on a slower machine it's more overhead. There are ways to speed it up, see Disable the NTFS Last Access Time Stamp for an example.

http://www.ntfs.com/boot-disk.htm has a free-download floppy disk image that, when expanded to a floppy, creates a bootable disk that will allow you to copy files from an NTFS partition to a FAT32 partition (or another hard drive) or a network. The site has other utilities as well, both free and for pay. The Knoppix CD will allow you to do the same thing, if you're able to boot from a CD.
-- Michael Rudas
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way (article by Eric Raymond).
Dealing with Malware
My Articles page.
My Best-of-Breed Free Software for Windows list
Other Windows- & Microsoft-related links
The Audio Tech's Page
My blog
The Oak Park Computer Club
PenguiCon 4.0 Open Source & Science Fiction convention, April 21-23, 2006.
Knoppix Linux (CD-bootable) download. information, & support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 156
Reputation: RC_Razor is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
RC_Razor's Avatar
RC_Razor RC_Razor is offline Offline
Junior Poster

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #12
Feb 27th, 2004
I C all and powerful TALLCOOL1.. your knowledge is outstanding ... thanks..
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2003
Posts: 282
Reputation: Roberdin will become famous soon enough Roberdin will become famous soon enough 
Solved Threads: 6
Team Colleague
Roberdin Roberdin is offline Offline
Supreme Evil Overlord

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #13
Feb 27th, 2004
Also, if you share your computer amongst multiple users, you can restrict access to certain files and folders to yourself only, for example.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 156
Reputation: RC_Razor is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
RC_Razor's Avatar
RC_Razor RC_Razor is offline Offline
Junior Poster

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #14
Feb 27th, 2004
Originally Posted by TallCool1
Your new partitions should be NTFS. It's more reliable and can handle larger files. Contrary to earlier posts, it's FAT32 that has a 2GB-per-file limit, the limit for NTFS is much higher.

I generally reserve about a 10 GB partition for Windows, the rest for data. The data partition should be NTFS, too - but be aware that on a slower machine it's more overhead. There are ways to speed it up, see Disable the NTFS Last Access Time Stamp for an example.

http://www.ntfs.com/boot-disk.htm has a free-download floppy disk image that, when expanded to a floppy, creates a bootable disk that will allow you to copy files from an NTFS partition to a FAT32 partition (or another hard drive) or a network. The site has other utilities as well, both free and for pay. The Knoppix CD will allow you to do the same thing, if you're able to boot from a CD.
i thought is was 4GB for FAT32 and unlimited for NTFS, this info from NTFS VS. FAT32.. not to offend anyone thats just what i thought....
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 156
Reputation: RC_Razor is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
RC_Razor's Avatar
RC_Razor RC_Razor is offline Offline
Junior Poster

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #15
Feb 27th, 2004
NTFS well limited only by the volume size...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 865
Reputation: TallCool1 is a jewel in the rough TallCool1 is a jewel in the rough TallCool1 is a jewel in the rough 
Solved Threads: 43
Team Colleague
TallCool1's Avatar
TallCool1 TallCool1 is offline Offline
Practically a Posting Shark

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #16
Feb 29th, 2004
Originally Posted by RC_Razor
I thought it was 4GB for FAT32 and unlimited for NTFS. Not to offend anyone thats just what I thought....
No offense taken. Actually there is often some confusion about this. As far as I have been able to determine, one bit is reserved for offset (used to indicate whether seeking forward or backwards in a file), which limits an individual file to 2 GB on FAT32.
Last edited by TallCool1; Feb 29th, 2004 at 10:52 pm. Reason: Clarification -- 2 GB limit is on FAT32.
-- Michael Rudas
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way (article by Eric Raymond).
Dealing with Malware
My Articles page.
My Best-of-Breed Free Software for Windows list
Other Windows- & Microsoft-related links
The Audio Tech's Page
My blog
The Oak Park Computer Club
PenguiCon 4.0 Open Source & Science Fiction convention, April 21-23, 2006.
Knoppix Linux (CD-bootable) download. information, & support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 457
Reputation: oalee is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 12
Team Colleague
oalee's Avatar
oalee oalee is offline Offline
cyberkill(ed)

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #17
Feb 29th, 2004
Originally Posted by TallCool1
No offense taken. Actually there is often some confusion about this. As far as I have been able to determine, one bit is reserved for offset (used to indicate whether seeking forward or backwards in a file), which limits an individual file to 2 GB.
is that 2 GB for FAT32 or NTFS???
*-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*
*I am the oceans.. Still, still yet always in constant *
*motion.Quiet but never afraid,Silent but always awake*
*And no God nor Man can control where you roam.. no *
*boundaries cast forever you last.... *
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,643
Reputation: caperjack is a splendid one to behold caperjack is a splendid one to behold caperjack is a splendid one to behold caperjack is a splendid one to behold caperjack is a splendid one to behold caperjack is a splendid one to behold caperjack is a splendid one to behold 
Solved Threads: 500
Team Colleague
caperjack's Avatar
caperjack caperjack is offline Offline
Posting Prodigy

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #18
Feb 29th, 2004
ntfs,which makes it good for video editing
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: May 2003
Posts: 865
Reputation: TallCool1 is a jewel in the rough TallCool1 is a jewel in the rough TallCool1 is a jewel in the rough 
Solved Threads: 43
Team Colleague
TallCool1's Avatar
TallCool1 TallCool1 is offline Offline
Practically a Posting Shark

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #19
Feb 29th, 2004
Originally Posted by oalee
is that 2 GB for FAT32 or NTFS???
2 GB limit for Fat32. 2 terabytes (the maximum volume size) for NTFS, either version.
-- Michael Rudas
How To Ask Questions The Smart Way (article by Eric Raymond).
Dealing with Malware
My Articles page.
My Best-of-Breed Free Software for Windows list
Other Windows- & Microsoft-related links
The Audio Tech's Page
My blog
The Oak Park Computer Club
PenguiCon 4.0 Open Source & Science Fiction convention, April 21-23, 2006.
Knoppix Linux (CD-bootable) download. information, & support.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 457
Reputation: oalee is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 12
Team Colleague
oalee's Avatar
oalee oalee is offline Offline
cyberkill(ed)

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #20
Feb 29th, 2004
thanks tall...
*-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*
*I am the oceans.. Still, still yet always in constant *
*motion.Quiet but never afraid,Silent but always awake*
*And no God nor Man can control where you roam.. no *
*boundaries cast forever you last.... *
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Windows NT / 2000 / XP Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC