Reply

Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 457
Reputation: oalee is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 12
Team Colleague
oalee's Avatar
oalee oalee is offline Offline
cyberkill(ed)

FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #1
Feb 26th, 2004
== I just need to know, I'm sure I'll be needing the info in the future. ==

Whenever I install win2k over win98/ME or I start on a clean install of win2k/XP, I always choose FAT32. This is mainly because I'm familiar with it, and NTFS can't be seen on win98/ME when I last had a dual boot operating system. What's the difference between NTFS and FAT32? which is better? should I use NTFS over FAT32 on a win2k/XP system? can I view/share files from a computer with NTFS using a computer with FAT32 (meaning win98/ME) over a network?

Please enlighten me...
*-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*
*I am the oceans.. Still, still yet always in constant *
*motion.Quiet but never afraid,Silent but always awake*
*And no God nor Man can control where you roam.. no *
*boundaries cast forever you last.... *
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Aug 2003
Posts: 9,441
Reputation: caperjack is a splendid one to behold caperjack is a splendid one to behold caperjack is a splendid one to behold caperjack is a splendid one to behold caperjack is a splendid one to behold caperjack is a splendid one to behold caperjack is a splendid one to behold 
Solved Threads: 476
Team Colleague
caperjack's Avatar
caperjack caperjack is online now Online
Posting Prodigy

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #2
Feb 26th, 2004
No win 98 or ME will not see the NTFS ,NTFS is more stable and the single file size can be upto 2Gigs .thats the main difference to my knowledge.one way or the other it wouldn't matter what one you use ,thats my opinion !
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 457
Reputation: oalee is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 12
Team Colleague
oalee's Avatar
oalee oalee is offline Offline
cyberkill(ed)

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #3
Feb 26th, 2004
so, based on your post, the only difference is that it can handle a single file up to the size of 2Gigs. what do you mean by more stable? stable in what way?
tnx.
*-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*
*I am the oceans.. Still, still yet always in constant *
*motion.Quiet but never afraid,Silent but always awake*
*And no God nor Man can control where you roam.. no *
*boundaries cast forever you last.... *
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 156
Reputation: RC_Razor is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
RC_Razor's Avatar
RC_Razor RC_Razor is offline Offline
Junior Poster

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #4
Feb 26th, 2004
check this out.... NTFS vs FAT
this should be the info yous need your welcome :lol:
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 156
Reputation: RC_Razor is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
RC_Razor's Avatar
RC_Razor RC_Razor is offline Offline
Junior Poster
 
0
  #5
Feb 26th, 2004
Q: How does NTFS compared to FAT32 in Windows XP, and which is faster?

A: NTFS has much more built-in features than FAT, so generally it is a bit slower.

However it depends on many factors such as cluster size, average file size, etc.

For example, NTFS can keep small files inside MFT entry, so if the file size is less than cluster size, most likely it will be accessed much faster on NTFS than on FAT.

Generally speaking the performance of NTFS on large volumes is higher than performance of FAT32. NTFS performance on small volumes is lower than performance of FAT/FAT32.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 457
Reputation: oalee is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 12
Team Colleague
oalee's Avatar
oalee oalee is offline Offline
cyberkill(ed)

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #6
Feb 26th, 2004
Thank you very much for the info RC_Razor. what if my win2k crashes and I want to boot from a floppy? is there a bootdisk that can access an NTFS? if there is, then I'll probably have to repartition my HDD to NTFS since everything you've said sums up everything to the NTFS being way much better than FAT/FAT32.
*-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*
*I am the oceans.. Still, still yet always in constant *
*motion.Quiet but never afraid,Silent but always awake*
*And no God nor Man can control where you roam.. no *
*boundaries cast forever you last.... *
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 56
Reputation: Jra2003 is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
Jra2003 Jra2003 is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #7
Feb 27th, 2004
not sure about the boot disk disk but to add more information on the difference between the two.

The biggest difference comes when you network and share files over a LAN,

FAT: you can specify only down to which folder to share, and you can add a password to it, but anyone on the LAN who has the password can get into it.

NTFS: You can share files down to a specific file and not a whole directory and you can type in which computers can access it. So if you want no one else but a certain computer to read the file over the LAN, you can set it to do so, but not in FAT
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 457
Reputation: oalee is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 12
Team Colleague
oalee's Avatar
oalee oalee is offline Offline
cyberkill(ed)

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #8
Feb 27th, 2004
Originally Posted by Jra2003
FAT: you can specify only down to which folder to share, and you can add a password to it, but anyone on the LAN who has the password can get into it.
Can you do that to FAT32 on win2k? I mean, share a specific file?
*-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-==-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*
*I am the oceans.. Still, still yet always in constant *
*motion.Quiet but never afraid,Silent but always awake*
*And no God nor Man can control where you roam.. no *
*boundaries cast forever you last.... *
*=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=-=*
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 56
Reputation: Jra2003 is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
Jra2003 Jra2003 is offline Offline
Junior Poster in Training

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #9
Feb 27th, 2004
no, on fat32, you can only narrow down to the directory, either the whole directory or nothing at all. NTFS adds more flexibility so you are allowed to specify which files to share. It isn't really dependent on the OS just format type.
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Join Date: Feb 2004
Posts: 156
Reputation: RC_Razor is an unknown quantity at this point 
Solved Threads: 0
RC_Razor's Avatar
RC_Razor RC_Razor is offline Offline
Junior Poster

Re: FAT32 vs. NTFS

 
0
  #10
Feb 27th, 2004
things i didnt know ^ thanks... im also unsure about the boot disk .... and your welcome for the info...
Reply With Quote Quick reply to this message  
Reply

This thread is more than three months old.
Perhaps start a new thread instead?
Message:



Similar Threads
Other Threads in the Windows NT / 2000 / XP Forum
Thread Tools Search this Thread



About Us | Contact Us | Advertise | DaniWeb | Acceptable Use Policy | RSS Feed

©2003 - 2009 DaniWeb® LLC