| | |
SATA Laptop Raid????
![]() |
•
•
Join Date: Oct 2005
Posts: 1
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
I am hoping someone can give me some insight on making a SATA raid with a PCMCIA card. I have a new Alienware laptop that kicks butt and I want to make it rock hard with a raid. I want to stick 2 250gig hard drives on a two channel sata pcmcia card. I will get the enclosures as well of course. Now here is where my question is if I did that how fast would it be? Would the data transfer be faster than the ide drive in my laptop? In the laptop I just have a 60g ATA-100. I want to be able to run programs and stuff of the raid, Raid 0 by the way. Would this be possible? if so I would get a 3-4 bay hard drive enclosure, 2 of them, and get a 2+ terabyte semi portalbe raid. Anyone want to chime in and help me out or guide me. Thanks
In order to do RAID through SATA, the interface bus must support RAID. This means that you need to get a SATA PCMCIA card that has a RAID chip. I was unable to find any that met this criteria.
As far as extreme performance goes, I can't imagine that you could get extreme performance by first going through the PCI bus, then through the PCMCIA bus, then through the bus on the PCMCIA card, then through the drive. I was unable to find any benchmarks, but I would believe that the sustained data rates through an IDE channel would be higher than through PCMCIA.
Laptops are designed for ease of use over performance. If you are wanting insane performance, custom build yourself an ATX machine with all the bells, whistles, and tricked outness. It definately sounds like you have money to blow on this concept, so I don't know why you would try to pimp out a laptop rather than just building a high-performance desktop that would offer superior flexability and performance at a lower cost and level of frustration.
As far as extreme performance goes, I can't imagine that you could get extreme performance by first going through the PCI bus, then through the PCMCIA bus, then through the bus on the PCMCIA card, then through the drive. I was unable to find any benchmarks, but I would believe that the sustained data rates through an IDE channel would be higher than through PCMCIA.
Laptops are designed for ease of use over performance. If you are wanting insane performance, custom build yourself an ATX machine with all the bells, whistles, and tricked outness. It definately sounds like you have money to blow on this concept, so I don't know why you would try to pimp out a laptop rather than just building a high-performance desktop that would offer superior flexability and performance at a lower cost and level of frustration.
Did we help you? Did we miss the point entirely? Update your thread and let us know.
Don't like the answers you are getting?
Did you try searching?
Clean up and optimize Windows 2000/XP
Don't like the answers you are getting?
Did you try searching?
Clean up and optimize Windows 2000/XP
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Actually, it's not a bad question.
This question is 'old' (from 2005), yet it comes up almost first in a Google Search for the same topic.
An old laptop can provide excellent benefits:
- Lower power consumption*
- Compact design to fit in a small (ventilated) server cabinet
- Lower noise
I was messing around with the idea of running RAID on my Desktop's SiI3112-based 2-port PCI Sata card. I found updated flash bios for the card. The similar 3112-based PCMCIA card I found does not have this. Without hardware card RAID support, one can do a software-based RAID (mirroring) array in Windows XP, yes, for additional storage once the computer is running. This RAID array could not be bootable though, unless the PCMCIA card contained boot bios code.
While current laptops, some, offer RAID, the idea is using an older laptop with no more battery life, to function as a low-power server.
*Compare this with a super-locked Athlon XP 2600+, and a Shuttle NFORCE2-based board Desktop. Runs a modified XP, Apache2, eMule, uTorrent, Dyndns.org client, and several terminal server sessions. Works great inside a double-walled steel case (from a quality office Fujitsu Siemens), only problem is: NFORCE2 does not support the powernow management of an AMD Athlon XP 2600+, or so I've read (I could be wrong). Box always runs at top speed, and uses the maximum amount of electricity. Whereas a laptop, by definition, uses less electricity at least when idling.
This question is 'old' (from 2005), yet it comes up almost first in a Google Search for the same topic.
An old laptop can provide excellent benefits:
- Lower power consumption*
- Compact design to fit in a small (ventilated) server cabinet
- Lower noise
I was messing around with the idea of running RAID on my Desktop's SiI3112-based 2-port PCI Sata card. I found updated flash bios for the card. The similar 3112-based PCMCIA card I found does not have this. Without hardware card RAID support, one can do a software-based RAID (mirroring) array in Windows XP, yes, for additional storage once the computer is running. This RAID array could not be bootable though, unless the PCMCIA card contained boot bios code.
While current laptops, some, offer RAID, the idea is using an older laptop with no more battery life, to function as a low-power server.
*Compare this with a super-locked Athlon XP 2600+, and a Shuttle NFORCE2-based board Desktop. Runs a modified XP, Apache2, eMule, uTorrent, Dyndns.org client, and several terminal server sessions. Works great inside a double-walled steel case (from a quality office Fujitsu Siemens), only problem is: NFORCE2 does not support the powernow management of an AMD Athlon XP 2600+, or so I've read (I could be wrong). Box always runs at top speed, and uses the maximum amount of electricity. Whereas a laptop, by definition, uses less electricity at least when idling.
•
•
Join Date: Jun 2008
Posts: 2
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 0
Focusing back specifically to the original poster's question of adding a RAID array to a normal-use laptop, the Western Digital MyBook World Edition II offers RAID mirroring, supporting 2x 1tb drives, in a tight-looking case, offering several possible connections (I think USB/Ethernet and maybe Firewire or Sata) This unit costs about 400-500 USD.
Google for some articles. I found this one: http://martin.hinner.info/mybook/
If you are trying to save the maximum amount of money, though, and do it on the super-cheap, with two external eSata drives, then software mirroring in your Operating System is the way to go.
Google for some articles. I found this one: http://martin.hinner.info/mybook/
If you are trying to save the maximum amount of money, though, and do it on the super-cheap, with two external eSata drives, then software mirroring in your Operating System is the way to go.
![]() |
Similar Threads
- When setting up raid 1 do can you use sata drives? (Storage)
- SATA Internal 2 External Help Needed (Storage)
- SATA install problems -- I'm Frustrated! (Storage)
- 5 SATA drives on Raid won't all spin up (Motherboards, CPUs and RAM)
- installing sata harddrive (Storage)
- Maxtor DiamondMax Plus 9 SATA RAID-0 Strip (Storage)
- SATA Hard drive problem (Storage)
Other Threads in the Storage Forum
- Previous Thread: Dead Hard
- Next Thread: SATA vs IDE DVD drive
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Tag cloud for Storage
acronis administration archivevault array atmail backup backupandrecoverystrategy blinkingcursor boot clone data databasededuplication datadeduplicationsoftware datarecovery datastorage deduping deduplicating deduplication deduplicationalgorithm deduplicationsoftware deduplicationsystems deduplicationtechnology disasterrecovery disasterrecoverydatabase disc-drive discdrives drive emailappliance emailarchive emailstorage failure filters gmail hard harddrive hitachi mail maxtor networking news nobelprize norton offsitestorage partition power raid recovery restoreserverdatabase serverdatarecovery serverdisasterrecovery serverrecoverysoftware storage terabyte undelete upper virtualization windowsserverrestore





