| | |
What does it take to get a webcam to go faster?
![]() |
I have a semi fast speed of 3.0 and a pretty fast computer. Is ther any way to make your webcam go a little faster instead of frame by frame. I have a pretty nice webcam.
Antec P180 special edition, Epox 9NPA+ Ultra, AMD 64 3700+ San Diego with Zalman 7000, 2GB Corsair PC3200, Gigabyte GV--NX66T128VP, Fortron Blue Storm 500 watt,Seagate Sata 250gb, Audigy 2 ZS Gamer, Altec Lansing ADA995 5.1 THX, Digital Doc 5+, Plextor 712A, BenQ LS DW1655, Canopus ADVC50 capture card,XP Pro SP2
•
•
Join Date: Dec 2004
Posts: 207
Reputation:
Solved Threads: 7
Possibilities:
1. A higher speed connection.
If you have standard dial-up, it's going to go frame-by-frame. The data can't go out fast enough to do anything except frame by frame.
A 640 X 480 24-bit color frame contains 7372800 bits. At 56Kbaud, it will take 164.5 seconds (2 minutes 41.5 seconds) to transmit one frame (including the modem synchronizing bits).
2. Lower resolution.
Leaving out every other pixel both vertically and horizontally divides the size of each frame by 4, making transmission of the 1843200 bits take only 1/4 of the time.
3. Monochrome.
Sending the picture in grayscale instead of color reduces the size to 2457600 bits, and the time to 1/3 of that taken with color.
4. Reduced color set.
Using 256 colors also reduces the size to 2457600 bits and the time to 1/3 of that taken with 24-bit color.
5. Intermittent capture.
Instead of capturing one frame every 164.5 seconds, capture a 20 second segment every so often, and transmit it over a longer period. The receiving person then can reconstitute it at the faster speed by downloading, then playing.
6. Data compression.
Using data compressing techniques (such as mpeg) allows the subsequent frames to send only the data needed for the changing parts of the picture.
1. A higher speed connection.
If you have standard dial-up, it's going to go frame-by-frame. The data can't go out fast enough to do anything except frame by frame.
A 640 X 480 24-bit color frame contains 7372800 bits. At 56Kbaud, it will take 164.5 seconds (2 minutes 41.5 seconds) to transmit one frame (including the modem synchronizing bits).
2. Lower resolution.
Leaving out every other pixel both vertically and horizontally divides the size of each frame by 4, making transmission of the 1843200 bits take only 1/4 of the time.
3. Monochrome.
Sending the picture in grayscale instead of color reduces the size to 2457600 bits, and the time to 1/3 of that taken with color.
4. Reduced color set.
Using 256 colors also reduces the size to 2457600 bits and the time to 1/3 of that taken with 24-bit color.
5. Intermittent capture.
Instead of capturing one frame every 164.5 seconds, capture a 20 second segment every so often, and transmit it over a longer period. The receiving person then can reconstitute it at the faster speed by downloading, then playing.
6. Data compression.
Using data compressing techniques (such as mpeg) allows the subsequent frames to send only the data needed for the changing parts of the picture.
I have 3008kbps which is pretty fast. I could probably do some of the other things but that takes some of the fun out of it.
Antec P180 special edition, Epox 9NPA+ Ultra, AMD 64 3700+ San Diego with Zalman 7000, 2GB Corsair PC3200, Gigabyte GV--NX66T128VP, Fortron Blue Storm 500 watt,Seagate Sata 250gb, Audigy 2 ZS Gamer, Altec Lansing ADA995 5.1 THX, Digital Doc 5+, Plextor 712A, BenQ LS DW1655, Canopus ADVC50 capture card,XP Pro SP2
Is 3mbps your downspeed? If so, what is your upspeed?
Furthermore, are you sure that your connection speed is the limiting factor? What about the people that are viewing your cam? What are their connection speeds?
Are you multicasting or do you have to run a connection for each viewer?
Furthermore, are you sure that your connection speed is the limiting factor? What about the people that are viewing your cam? What are their connection speeds?
Are you multicasting or do you have to run a connection for each viewer?
Did we help you? Did we miss the point entirely? Update your thread and let us know.
Don't like the answers you are getting?
Did you try searching?
Clean up and optimize Windows 2000/XP
Don't like the answers you are getting?
Did you try searching?
Clean up and optimize Windows 2000/XP
1500kbps down up? My up is around 512 kbps.
Antec P180 special edition, Epox 9NPA+ Ultra, AMD 64 3700+ San Diego with Zalman 7000, 2GB Corsair PC3200, Gigabyte GV--NX66T128VP, Fortron Blue Storm 500 watt,Seagate Sata 250gb, Audigy 2 ZS Gamer, Altec Lansing ADA995 5.1 THX, Digital Doc 5+, Plextor 712A, BenQ LS DW1655, Canopus ADVC50 capture card,XP Pro SP2
![]() |
Similar Threads
- Webcam stops transmitting image (USB Devices and other Peripherals)
- Webcam (USB Devices and other Peripherals)
- logitech webcam audio (USB Devices and other Peripherals)
Other Threads in the USB Devices and other Peripherals Forum
- Previous Thread: GE Wireless Keyboard & Mouse
- Next Thread: Looking for some opinions on photoprinters
| Thread Tools | Search this Thread |
Tag cloud for USB Devices and other Peripherals
acer advancedmicrodevices amd analogdevices apple at&t buffett cellphones chips chipstocks crm directtv dish dolcegmail firewire gadget gmail hacking handhelddevices hardware ieee intel logitech mice microchips microndevices mouse news obama openliven peripherals photoframe plug-in port printer removabledevices satellite security semiconductors semiconductorstocks specification stocks sugarcrm technology television texasinstruments text usb usb3.0 usbkey vista xeon





